Procedures for interworking with EPS based on N26 interface (clause 4.11.1) and interworking without N26 interface (clause 4.11.2);
Handover procedures between EPS and 5GC-N3IWF (clause 4.11.3), handover procedures between EPS and 5GC-TNGF (clause 4.11.3a) and handover procedures between EPC/ePDG and 5GS (clause 4.11.4);
Impact to 5GC procedure due to interworking with EPC (clause 4.11.5);
Interworking for common network exposure (clause 4.11.6).
In clause 4.11, UEs are assumed to support both 5GC NAS and EPC NAS unless explicitly stated otherwise.
The procedures in clause 4.11 are not applicable for Disaster Roaming service (see clause 5.40 of TS 23.501).
Interworking between EPS and 5GS and between EPC/ePDG and 5GS is supported with IP address preservation by assuming SSC mode 1. Interworking between EPS and 5GS and between EPC/ePDG and 5GS is not supported for PDU Sessions with SSC mode 2 or SSC mode 3.
When interworking with 5GS is supported and a "SMF+PGW-C" is selected for a PDN connection, policy interactions between PDN GW and PCRF specified in TS 23.401 are replaced by equivalent interactions between SMF+PGW-C and PCF as follows:
IP-CAN Session Establishment procedure defined in TS 23.203 is replaced by SM Policy Association Establishment Procedure as described in clause 4.16.4. The SMF+PGW-C includes the information elements received in Create Session Request message into the Npcf_SMPolicyControl_Create Service as follows: the SUPI contains the IMSI, the DNN contains the APN, the PEI contains either the IMEISV or IMEI, the Session AMBR contains the APN-AMBR and the default QoS information that contains the default EPS bearer QoS, note that QCI values are mapped into 5QI values. The SMF+PGW-C may receive PCC Rules and PDU Session Policy Information, 5G QoS information in the PCC Rule and in PDU Session Policy Information are mapped into EPS QoS information as defined in clause 4.11.1.1 and Annex C.
(PCEF-initiated) IP-CAN Session Modification procedure defined in TS 23.203 is replaced by SM Policy Association Modification procedure as described in clause 4.16.5.1. The Policy Control Request Triggers are specified in clause 6.1.3.5 of TS 23.503.
The SMF+PGW-C includes the QoS related information elements received in Modify Bearer Request or Modify Bearer Command message into the Npcf_SMPolicyControl_Update Service with the following modifications, the subscribed Session AMBR includes the subscribed APN-AMBR and subscribed default QoS information includes the default EPS bearer QoS, note that QCI values are mapped into 5QI values. The SMF+PGW-C may receive PCC Rules and PDU Session Policy Information, 5G QoS information in the PCC Rule and in PDU Session Policy Information are mapped into EPS QoS information as defined in clause 4.11.1.1 and Annex C.
The SMF+PGW-C includes the location related information received in Modify Bearer Request (as specified in clause 5.9.2 of TS 23.401) into Npcf_SMPolicyControl_Update if the corresponding Policy Control Request Triggers (i.e. Location change, Change of UE presence in Presence Reporting Area) are provisioned.
The SMF+PGW-C includes the information elements received in Delete Bearer Command message into the Npcf_SMPolicyControl_Update Service.
(PCRF-initiated) IP-CAN Session Modification procedure defined in TS 23.203 is replaced by SM Policy Association Modification procedure as described in clause 4.16.5.2. The SMF+PGW-C may receive PCC Rules and PDU Session Policy Information, 5G QoS information in the PCC Rule and in PDU Session Policy Information are mapped into EPS QoS information as defined in clause 4.11.1.1 and Annex C.
IP-CAN Session Termination procedure defined in TS 23.203 is replaced by SM Policy Association Termination procedure as described in clause 4.16.6. The SMF+PGW-C includes the information elements received in Delete Session Request message by the SMF+PGW-C into the Npcf_SMPolicyControl_Delete Service.
URSP provisioning may be supported in EPS and the procedures are specified in clause 4.11.0a.2a.
This clause captures the enhancement to the interaction with PCC to support URSP delivery via EPS.
To Support URSP provisioning in EPS, the SMF+PGW-C receives the Indication of URSP Provisioning Support from the UE as defined in TS 23.501. If the SMF+PGW-C also supports URSP Provisioning Support in EPS and ePCO, it selects a PCF which also supports URSP Provisioning in EPS to establish the SM Policy Association based on the received Indication of URSP Provisioning Support in EPS PCO and local configuration. The SMF+PGW-C then provides the "Indication of URSP Provisioning Support in EPS" in the ePCO to the UE.
When the SMF+PGW-C receives the UE Policy Container ePCO in Bearer Resource Command during UE requested bearer resource modification procedure, it forwards transparently the UE Policy Container to PCF for the PDU Session in the Npcf_SMPolicyControl_Update Request including indication that "UE Policy Container received" PCRT was met. When the PCF for Session Management receives UE Policy Container from PCF for the UE, it forwards the UE Policy Container to SMF+PGW-C in Npcf_SMPolicyControl_UpdateNotify Request. The PCF for the PDU Session retrieves the PCRTs for UE Policy from PCF for the UE and subscribe to the applicable PCRTs in EPC to SMF+PGW-C.
During initial attach or PDN connection establishment procedure, if SMF+PGW-C supports URSP provisioning in EPS, PCF for the UE and PCF for the PDU session may be discovered as indicated in clause 5.2.7.3.2 by indicating the URSP delivery in EPS capability to NRF.
During initial registration in 5GS, if 5GS supports URSP provisioning in EPS, PCF for the UE and PCF for the PDU session may be discovered as indicated in clause 5.2.7.3.2 by indicating the URSP delivery in EPS capability to NRF. During 5GS to EPS mobility, PCF for the PDU session discovers PCF for the UE is in BSF.
When URSP Provisioning is supported in EPS, the PCF for the PDU Session may establish the UE Policy Association with PCF for the UE:
When the first UE Policy Container is received from the UE for an SM Policy association.
During 5GS to EPS mobility with N26 when the SMF+PGW-C notifies the PCF for the PDU Session about a RAT-Type change via Npcf_SMPolicyControl_Update.
The PCF for the UE triggers the re-evaluation of applicable URSPs in the cases as described in clause 6.1.2.2.3 of TS 23.503 and determines whether an update of URSP is needed for the UE. The PCF for the UE generates the URSP and sends it to the PCF for the PDU Session in the UE Policy Container via Npcf_UEPolicyControl_UpdateNotify Request.
The procedures for the UE Policy association defined in clauses 4.16.11, 4.16.12 and 4.16.13 apply in EPS with the main differences below:
AMF is replaced by the PCF for the PDU Session.
Delivery of UE Policy Containers from the PCF for the UE to the PCF for the PDU Session is done via Npcf_UEPolicyControl service instead of via UE Configuration Update procedure.
Delivery of UE Policy Containers from the SMF+PGW-C to the UE is done via PDN GW initiated bearer modification without QoS update procedure as specified in clause 4.11.0a.2a.10.
URSP delivery via EPS is also supported in roaming scenarios, both for a PDN connection established in Home Routed and for a PDN connection established in LBO.
The following additions are applicable to clause 4.16.4 (SM Policy Association Establishment procedure):
In addition to step 4 the PCF determines whether the PDN connection supports the provisioning of URSP rules in EPS by checking URSP delivery in EPS support indication provided by the SMF+PGW-C. The SMF+PGW-C provides that indication based on local capabilities and operator policies. The PCF may receive the URSP delivery in EPS support indication provided by the SMF+PGW-C and store the indication for the following use (for example, URSP rule provision to UE during 5GS to EPS mobility).
The following enhancement is applicable to clause 4.11.0a.2 which refers to clause 4.16.4 (SM Policy Association Establishment):
Step 1 of clause 4.16.4: If the SMF+PGW-C receives URSP Provisioning Support indication, the SMF+PGW-C selects the PCF based on the URSP delivery in EPS capability of the PCF, as defined in clause 6.3.7.1 of TS 23.501.
When SMF+PGW-C receives the UE Policy Container in the UE requested bearer resource modification procedure, the SMF+PGW-C provides the UE Policy Container to the PCF.
The SM Policy Association Modification procedure in clause 4.16.5.1 applies with the following enhancements is executed with the following differences, applicable between step 4 and step 5:
If the PCF receives both the indication that the PCRT "UE Policy Container received" was met and the UE Policy Container, steps 4a to 4c below are executed.
Step 4a: The PCF for the PDU Session discovers the PCF for the UE by querying the BSF, using Nbsf_Management_Discovery for the SUPI. If no result is obtained from the BSF the PCF for the PDU Session selects the PCF for the UE by querying NRF, using the URSP delivery in EPS capability of the PCF, as defined in clause 6.3.7.1 of TS 23.501.
Step 4b: The PCF for the PDU Session establishes a UE Policy Association towards the PCF for the UE as described in clause 4.11.0a.2a.5.
Step 4c: If the PCF for the UE provides any Policy Control Request Trigger parameters in the Npcf_UEPolicyControl Create Response the PCF for the PDU Session takes them into account for the generation of Policy Control Request Triggers to the SMF+PGW-C.
During 5GS to EPS mobility procedure, the PCF for the PDU Session establishes a UE Policy Association towards the PCF for the UE if it exists otherwise, it performs PCF discovery and selection then establishes a UE Policy Association. During EPS to 5GS mobility procedure the PCF for the PDU Session terminates the UE Policy Association, if established during 5GS to EPS mobility.
The following enhancements are applicable to clause 4.16.5.1 (SMF initiated SM Policy Association Modification procedure):
In addition to step 4 in clause 4.16.5.1, the PCF determines that 5GS to EPS or EPS to 5GS mobility applies by checking a change in RAT and Access-Type.
If 5GS to EPS mobility applies, in non-roaming and Home Routed roaming the (H-)PCF for the PDU Session determines whether the UE supports provisioning of URSP Rules in EPS by checking indication of support of URSP delivery in EPS in UDR and in LBO roaming the V-PCF for the PDU Session determine whether the UE supports provisioning of URSP rules in EPS based on local configuration, e.g. using the PEI, given that the V-PCF has no access to UDR at the HPLMN. The (H-)PCF or the V-PCF determines if the SMF+PGW-C supports delivery of URSP Rules in EPS as reported by the SMF+PGW-C. If the PCF determines that the UE and the SMF+PGW-C support provisioning of URSP Rules in EPS, the PCF for the PDU Session finds the PCF for the UE using Nbsf_Management_Discovery for the SUPI and then performs UE Policy Association Establishment procedure as specified in clause 4.11.0a.2a.5. If no result is obtained from the BSF, the PCF for the PDU Session selects the PCF for the UE by querying NRF, using the URSP delivery in EPS capability of the PCF, as defined in clause 6.3.7.1 of TS 23.501.
If EPS to 5GS mobility applies, the PCF for the PDU Session requests the termination of the UE Policy association as described in clause 4.11.0a.2a.8.
When the UE reports the result of URSP rule update, the following enhancements are applicable to clause 4.16.5.1 (SM Policy Association Modification procedure):
In addition to step 4 in clause 4.16.5.1 if the PCF for the PDU Session receives the "UE Policy" Policy Control Request Trigger and associated UE Policy Container, steps 4a to 4b below are executed:
Step 4a: The PCF for the PDU Session determines that a UE Policy association has been already established towards the PCF for the UE for the SM Policy Association as described in clause 4.11.0a.2a.7.
Step 4b: The PCF for the PDU Session forwards the UE Policy Container to the PCF for the UE in Npcf_UEPolicyControl_Update Request.
For the purpose of URSP delivery in EPS, PCF initiated SM Policy Association Modification procedure is triggered by an interaction from the PCF for the UE.
The following enhancements are applicable to clause 4.16.5.2 (PCF initiated SM Policy Association Modification procedure):
Step 4: The PCF for the PDU Session may receive a UE Policy Container from the PCF for the UE and/or an update in the Policy Control Request Triggers applicable to the UE as described in clause 4.11.0a.2a.6:
If a UE Policy Container is received from the PCF for the UE, the PCF for the PDU Session selects one of the ongoing PDU Sessions for this UE that supports URSP Rule delivery in EPS according to clause 4.11.0a.2a.1 and includes that UE Policy Container in Npcf_SMPolicyControl_UpdateNotify request.
If an update in the Policy Control Request Triggers applicable to the UE is received, the PCF for the PDU Session determines whether an update on the current Policy Control Request Triggers needs to be sent to the SMF+PGW-C in Npcf_SMPolicyControl_UpdateNotify request.
To support the delivery of URSP rule in EPS as described in clause 6.1.2.2.3 of TS 23.503, the PCF for the PDU Session may establish a UE Policy Association towards the PCF for the UE.
This procedure may be triggered by the following procedures:
UE requested bearer resource modification.
5GS to EPS handover or 5GS to EPS Idle Mode mobility.
In the non-roaming case, the V-PCF for the UE is not involved, and the PCF for the PDU Session interacts with the PCF for the UE. For the Home Routed roaming scenario, the V-PCF for the UE is not involved and the H-PCF for the PDU Session interacts with the H-PCF for the UE. For the LBO roaming scenario, the V-PCF for the PDU Session interacts with the V-PCF for the UE and the V-PCF for the UE interacts with the H-PCF for the UE.
The procedure is based on clause 4.16.11.1 for a UE in 5GC with the following differences:
The PCF for the PDU Session determines the need of establishment of a UE Policy Association when:
A UE Policy Container is received from the UE during SM Policy Association Update at UE requested bearer resource modification as described in clause 4.11.0a.2a.2.1; or
Same as step 2 in clause 4.16.11, with the following exceptions:
The PCF for the PDU Session includes the UE Policy Container in case of SM Policy Association update at UE requested bearer resource modification or 5GS to EPS Mobility indication in case of SM Policy Association update at 5GS to EPS mobility.
For LBO roaming the V-PCF for the PDU Session discovers and selects an instance of the V-PCF for the UE based on the available PCF instances obtained from the NRF or locally configured information in the V-PCF, depending on operator's policies, as described in clause 6.3.7.1 of TS 23.501. The V-PCF for the PDU Session contacts the V-PCF for the UE and steps 3 and 4 are executed.
For non-roaming or Home Routed roaming the (H-)PCF for the PDU Session contacts the (H-)PCF for the UE and step5 follows.
Same as step 3 in clause 4.16.11.1, with the following exceptions:
The UE Policy Container is received at SM Policy Association instead of initial registration. When the UE Policy Association is being established due to 5GS to EPS mobility as described in clause 4.11.0a.2a.2.2, the V-PCF for the UE in the VPLMN needs to discover and select the same H-PCF for the UE that is serving the UE in the H-PLMN for 5GS by querying the BSF in the HPLMN. This is to be able to recover the information about the list of PSIs in the UE and the subscribed PCRTs from former UE Policy Association for the UE in 5GS as described in step 6. Therefore, the V-PCF for the UE in the VPLMN needs first to discover the BSF in the HPLMN.
Same as in clause 4.16.11.1 step 5, with the following exceptions:
The subscription to notification of N1 message delivery of policy information to the UE using Namf_Communication_N1N2MessageSubscribe service is not applicable.
The Same as step 6 in clause 4.16.11.1, with the following difference:
If "5GS to EPS Mobility" indication was received in Npcf_UEPolicyControl_Create in step 2 instead, the (H-)PCF recovers the information about the list of PSIs for the UE, the subscribed PCRTs in 5GS from former UE Policy Association for the UE and the indication about the support of provisioning of URSP rules in EPS. If the UE does not support the provisioning of URSPs in EPS, the H-PCF rejects the establishment of the UE Policy Association.
The (H-)PCF provides the UE Policy Container in the Npcf_UEPolicyControl_UpdateNotify Request.
The V-PCF for the UE forwards the UE Policy Container to the V-PCF for the PDU Session by invoking Npcf_UEPolicyControl_UpdateNotify Request. The V-PCF for the UE checks the size limit as described in clause 6.1.2.2.2 of TS 23.503.
If the UE provides a UE Policy Container with the result of the URSP update to the PCF for the PDU Session as described in clause 4.11.0a.2a.2.3 the PCF for the PDU Session forwards the UE Policy Container to the (V-) PCF for the UE invoking Npcf_UEPolicyControl_Update Request.
The following impacts are applicable to clause 4.16.12.2 (UE Policy Association Modification initiated by the PCF procedure):
In the non-roaming case, the V-PCF is not involved, the AMF is replaced by the PCF for the PDU Session, and the role of the H-PCF is performed by the PCF for the UE.
For the Home Routed roaming scenarios, the V-PCF is not involved, the AMF is replaced by the H-PCF for the PDU Session, and the role of the H-PCF is performed by the H-PCF for the UE.
For the LBO roaming scenarios, the AMF is replaced by the V-PCF for the PDU Session, the role of the V-PCF is performed by the V-PCF for the UE and the role of the H-PCF is performed by the H-PCF for the UE.
Steps 1a, 1c, 2a, 2c and 2d: These steps are not applicable for Home Routed roaming, since the V-PCF is not involved.
Step 3: The (H-)PCF may create the UE policy container including UE policy information as defined in clause 6.1.2.2.2 of TS 23.503. The (H-) PCF checks whether the UE Policy Association for the UE is established for a UE in EPS by checking the RAT-Type of the UE Policy Association and in this case the (H-)PCF may send the UE Policy Container in the Npcf_UEPolicyControl_UpdateNotify Request. The (H-)PCF may provide updated PCRTs over the UE policy association.
For Home Routed roaming, the V-PCF for the UE is not involved, therefore the Service Parameters provided by the AF from the VPLMN are not used by the H-PCF as input for the generation of the URSP rules.
Step 5: In case the UE Policy Association is for a UE in EPS, the (V-) PCF for the UE provides the UE Policy Container and/or policy control triggers to the (V-) PCF for the PDU Session.
Step 6: The (V-) PCF for the PDU session sends a response to the (V-) PCF for the UE.
Steps 7, 8 and 9 are replaced by steps 10-13 of procedure UE Policy Association Establishment in EPS from clause 4.11.0a.2a.5.
This procedure addresses the scenario where a Policy Control Request Trigger condition is met by the PCF for the PDU Session.
The procedure is based on the one defined in clause 4.16.12.1.1 with the following differences:
In the non-roaming case, the V-PCF is not involved, the AMF is replaced by the PCF for the PDU Session, and the role of the H-PCF is performed by the PCF for the UE.
For the Home Routed roaming scenarios, the V-PCF is not involved, the AMF is replaced by the H-PCF for the PDU Session, and the role of the H-PCF is performed by the H-PCF for the UE.
For the LBO roaming scenarios, the AMF is replaced by the V-PCF for the PDU Session, the role of the V-PCF is performed by the V-PCF for the UE and the role of the H-PCF is performed by the H-PCF for the UE.
Step 1: Same as in clause 4.16.12.1.1 step 1, with the following exceptions:
In LBO roaming the V-PCF for the PDU Session contacts the V-PCF for the UE and steps 2 and 3 are executed. The V-PCF for the UE contacts with the H-PCF for the UE discovered during the establishment of the UE Policy association as described in clause 4.11.0a.2a.5.
For non-roaming or Home Routed roaming the (H-)PCF for the PDU Session contacts the (H-)PCF for the UE and step 4 follows.
Step 5: The (H-)PCF may create the UE policy container including UE policy information as defined in clause 6.6 of TS 23.503. The (H-) PCF checks whether the UE Policy Association for the UE is established for a UE in EPS by checking the RAT-Type of the UE Policy Association and in this case the (H-)PCF may send the UE Policy Container in the Npcf_UEPolicyControl_UpdateNotify Request.
This procedure applies for non-roaming scenarios, LBO roaming scenarios and Home Routed roaming scenario.
In the non-roaming case, the V-PCF for the UE is not involved, the role of the V-PCF for the PDU session is performed by the PCF for the PDU session and the role of the H-PCF for the UE is performed by the PCF for the UE. For the LBO roaming scenarios, the V-PCF for the PDU session interacts with the V-PCF for the UE and the V-PCF for the UE interacts with the H-PCF for the UE.
In the Home Routed roaming scenario, the V-PCF for the UE is not involved, the role of the V-PCF for the PDU session is performed by the PCF for the PDU session in HPLMN and the role of the H-PCF for the UE is performed by the PCF for the UE in HPLMN.
The (V-)PCF for the PDU session terminates a UE Policy Association with the (V-)PCF for the UE when:
The SMF+P-GW-C notifies the changing of RAT type from EPS to 5GS; or
The last PDN connection for UE which supports URSP delivery in EPS according to clause 4.11.0a.2a.1 is released, either due to UE detached from EPS or other reason.
The procedure is based on the one defined in clause 4.16.13.2 (UE Policy Association Termination initiated by the PCF procedure) with the following differences:
In the non-roaming case, the V-PCF is not involved, the AMF is replaced by the PCF for the PDU Session, and the role of the H-PCF is performed by the PCF for the UE.
For the LBO roaming scenarios, the AMF is replaced by the V-PCF for the PDU Session, the role of the V-PCF is performed by the V-PCF for the UE.
In the Home Routed roaming scenario, the V-PCF is not involved. The AMF is replaced by the PCF for PDU Session in HPLMN, and the role of the H-PCF for the UE is performed by the PCF for the UE in HPLMN.
When the UE is in EPS, the UE Policy Association has been established by the (V-) PCF for PDU Session as described in clause 4.11.0a.2a.5.
Step 4: Change the AMF to the PCF for PDU Session. The PCF for UE may notify the PCF for PDU Session of the removal of the UE Policy Association via Npcf_UEPolicyControl_UpdateNotify service operation.
Step 5: Change the AMF to the PCF for PDU Session.
Step 6: Change AMF to the PCF for PDU Session and refer to the step 2 to step 5 in clause 4.11.0a.2a.8.
This procedure is initiated when the PCF for the UE decides to update URSP and to provide to the UE via EPS. Based on UE Policy Association Modification initiated by the PCF for the UE in 4.11.0a.2a.6 and PCF initiated SM Policy Association Modification in clause 4.11.0a.2a.3, the updated URSP Rule included UE Policy Container is received by SMF+PGW-C. The SMF+PGW-C transfers the received UE Policy Container via ePCO to the UE by initiating the bearer modification without QoS update procedure as described in clause 5.4.3 of TS 23.401.
The PCF for the UE creates the UE Policy Container including UE policy information, selects one of the ongoing UE Policy Associations for the UE in EPS in case more than one exists and sends the UE Policy Container in the Npcf_UEPolicyControl_UpdateNotify Request over the selected UE Policy Association as described in step 3 of clause 4.11.0a.2a.6. If the PCF for the UE has not subscribed to be notified by the PCF for the PDU Session, the PCF for the UE subscribes to the PCF for the PDU Session to be notified about the UE response to an update of UE policy information by including "Result of UE Policy Container delivery via EPS" PCRT in this message. If the AF requested to PCF for the UE to report on the outcome of the UE Policies delivery as specified in clause 4.15.6.7, "Result of UE Policy Container delivery via EPS" PCRT shall be included in this message.
The PCF for the PDU Session initiates SM Policy Association Modification procedure as described in step 4 of clause 4.11.0a.2a.3. The PCF for the PDU Session transfers the UE Policy Container by Npcf_SMPolicyControl_UpdateNotify Request for the selected PDN connection for the related UE in EPC. If the PCF for the PDU Session received "Result of UE Policy Container delivery via EPS" PCRT in step 1, the PCF for the PDU Session subscribes to the SMF+PGW-C with "Result of UE Policy Container delivery via EPS" PCRT.
The SMF+PGW-C initiates the bearer modification without bearer QoS update procedure, as described in clause 5.4.3 of TS 23.401. The UE includes the result of UE Policy delivery in response via ePCO.
The SMF+PGW-C transparently forwards the response of the UE to the PCF for the PDU Session by using Npcf_SMPolicyControl_Update Request. The message includes the indication that "Result of UE Policy Container delivery via EPS" PCRT was met.
If the SMF+PGW-C received rejection (e.g. due to paging failure) from Update Bearer Request message in step 5, then the SMF+PGW-C sends the delivery failure result with an appropriate reason (e.g. such that UE is temporarily not reachable) and the indication of "Result of UE Policy Container delivery via EPS" PCRT was met to the PCF for the PDU Session.
The PCF for the PDU Session transparently forwards the response from the UE, or the delivery failure result provided by SMF+PGW-C to the PCF for the UE by using Npcf_UEPolicyControl_Update Request. The message includes the indication of "Result of UE Policy Container delivery via EPS" PCRT was met.
If the AF requested to PCF for the UE to report on the outcome of the UE Policies delivery as specified in clause 4.15.6.7, the PCF for the UE reports the outcome of the UE Policies delivery to the AF with the received result from the PCF for the PDU Session.
The UE's subscription may include access restriction for NR in 5GS and restriction for Core Network Type (5GC). If so, the HSS provides these restrictions to the MME. The MME includes these restrictions in the Handover Restriction List to the E-UTRAN. The MME and E-UTRAN use these restrictions to determine if mobility of the UE to 5GS or NR connected to 5GS should be permitted.
When the UE requests to establish a non-emergency PDN connection to an APN, the MME may use the UE's support for 5GC NAS indication included in the UE Network Capability and/or UE's subscription from HSS that includes UE's mobility restriction parameters related to 5GS and/or indication of support for interworking with 5GS for this APN to determine if SMF+PGW-C or a standalone PGW-C should be selected. If both PGW-C and SMF+PGW-C is available, then MME may select SMF+PGW-C when UE's subscription from HSS indicate support for interworking with 5GS for the APN.
When the UE performs emergency attach or requests to establish an emergency PDN connection, the MME may use the UE's support for 5GC NAS indication included in the UE Network Capability and/or local configuration to determine if an emergency SMF+PGW-C or a standalone emergency PGW-C should be selected. An emergency SMF+PGW-C needs to be configured in Emergency Configuration Data in the MME if it is to be selected.
To enable a differentiation of the emergency gateway based on UE's support of 5GC NAS, the Emergency Configuration Data in the MME defined in TS 23.401 is extended with the IE listed in Table 4.11.0a.4-1.
The statically configured identity of a combined PDN GW-C/SMF used for emergency APN. The PDN GW-C/SMF identity may be either an FQDN or an IP address. (NOTE)
During establishment of non-emergency PDN connection in the EPC, the UE and the SMF+PGW-C exchange information via PCO as described in clause 5.15.7 of TS 23.501. For UE with 5GC NAS capability disabled (i.e. N1 mode is disabled), the UE may also allocate a PDU Session ID and send it to the SMF+PGW-C via PCO. If the SMF+PGW-C supports more than one S-NSSAI and the APN is valid for more than one S-NSSAI, before the SMF+PGW-C provides an S-NSSAI to the UE, the SMF+PGW-C should check such that the selected S-NSSAI is among the UE's subscribed S-NSSAIs which supports interworking with EPC and that the S-NSSAI is not subject to Network Slice-Specific Authentication and Authorization, by retrieving the Subscribed S-NSSAI from UDM using the Nudm_SDM_Get service operation (the SMF+PGW-C discovers and selects a UDM as described in clause 6.3.8 of TS 23.501). If the SMF+PGW-C is in a VPLMN, the SMF+PGW-C uses the Nnssf_NSSelection_Get service operation to retrieve a mapping of the Subscribed S-NSSAIs to Serving PLMN S-NSSAI values. If the S-NSSAIs supported by the SMF+PGW-C are all subject to NSSAA, then the SMF+PGW-C should reject the PDN connection establishment. If the selected S-NSSAI is subject to NSAC and EPS counting is required for the S-NSSAI, the SMF+PGW-C uses the Nnsacf_NSAC_NumberOfUEsUpdate services operation and/or the Nnsacf_NSAC_NumberOfPDUsUpdate services operation to check if the selected S-NSSAI is available as described in clause 4.11.5.9. The SMF+PGW-C uses the Nudm_SDM_Subscribe service operation to subscribe the change of the Session Management Subscription data. If the SMF+PGW-C is notified from UDM with subscription data change, the SMF+ PGW-C takes actions for the PDN connection as described in clause 5.17.2.1 of TS 23.501.
As described in TS 23.548, during establishment of a PDN connection, a UE that hosts EEC(s) may indicate to the SMF+PGW-C, in the PCO, that it supports the ability to receive ECS address(es) via NAS and to transfer the ECS Address(es) to the EEC(s). If the UE indicated in the PCO that it supports the ability to receive ECS address(es) via NAS, the SMF+PGW-C may provide the ECS Address Configuration Information (as described in clause 6.5.2 of TS 23.548) to the UE in the PCO. The SMF+PGW-C may derive the Edge Configuration Server Information based on local configuration, the UE's location and/or UE subscription information.
The SMF+PGW-C may use the bearer modification procedure without bearer QoS update to send the UE a PCO with updated ECS Address Configuration Information as defined in clause 6.5.2 of TS 23.548 to the UE.
During establishment of non-emergency PDN connection in the EPC, if PGW-C+SMF is selected for a UE that has 5GS subscription, the SMF may be configured to obtain the subscribed IP index from UDM as part of subscription data using the Nudm_SDM_Get service operation (the PGW-C+SMF discovers and selects a UDM as described in clause 6.3.8 of TS 23.501).
During establishment of non-emergency PDN connection in EPC, if PGW-C+SMF is selected for a UE that has 5GS subscription, the SMF may be configured to obtain the subscribed User Plane Security Policy from UDM as part of subscription data using the Nudm_SDM_Get service operation (the PGW-C+SMF discovers and selects a UDM as described in clause 6.3.8 of TS 23.501). The SMF uses the subscribed User Plane Security Policy as described in clause 5.10.3 of TS 23.501.
During establishment of non-emergency PDN connection in the EPC, if SMF+PGW-C is selected for a UE that has 5GS subscription but does not support 5GC NAS and is accessing via EPC/E-UTRAN and if the SMF+PGW-C supports more than one S-NSSAI and the APN is valid for more than one S-NSSAI, the SMF+PGW-C+PGW-C may proceed as specified in first paragraph of this clause or select any S-NSSAI associated with the APN of the PDN connection. The SMF+PGW-C shall not provide any 5GS related parameters to the UE.
During establishment of emergency PDN connection:
The SMF+PGW-C is to be derived from the emergency APN or to be statically configured in the Emergency Configuration Data in MME.
5GC interworking support with N26 or without N26 is determined based on UE's 5G NAS capability and local configuration (in the Emergency Configuration Data in MME).
The S-NSSAI configured for the emergency APN in SMF+PGW-C is not sent to the UE by the SMF+PGW-C. One S-NSSAI is configured for the emergency APN.
During establishment of non-emergency PDN connection and emergency PDN connection, if SMF+PGW-C is selected for a UE that does not support 5GC NAS, the SMF+PGW-C creates unique PDU Session ID for each PDN connection of the UE.
The unique PDU Session ID can be created based on the EPS Bearer IDs assigned by the MME for the PDN Connections associated with the UE and not be in the range of PDU Session ID values that can be created by a 5GC NAS capable UE.
If handover between EPS and EPC/ePDG (as specified in clause 8.6 of TS 23.402) is required, the SMF+PGW-C, based on operator configuration, may perform the following to ensure the uniqueness of PDU Session ID:
the SMF+PGW-C queries the UDM for any PDU Session ID(s) that are already registered in the UDM for the UE by invoking Nudm_UECM_Get service operation.
the SMF+PGW-C creates a PDU session ID that does not collide with the received PDU session ID(s).
When the SMF+PGW-C establishes the PDN connection successfully, the SMF+PGW-C performs UDM registration using the Nudm_UECM_Registration service operation.
When the SMF+PGW-C establishes the PDN connection successfully, the SMF+PGW-C provides the ID of the PCF ID selected for the PDN connection in the UDM using the Nudm_UECM_Registration service operation.
A SMF+PGW-C may support L2TP as described in clause 4.3.2.4. In this case step 1 and step 7 of Figure 4.3.2.4-1 correspond to a PDN Connection establishment and a SMF+PGW-C replaces the SMF in that Figure.
To support User Plane Integrity Protection with EPS and policies that Require User Plane integrity protection to be used, at PDN connection establishment, the MME shall indicate to the SMF+PGW-C (via the Serving GW) whether the UE, the current eNB and the MME support User Plane Integrity Protection in EPS. If the MME and the UE support User Plane Integrity Protection, then the SMF+PGW-C informs the MME of the User Plane integrity protection policy (Required, Preferred, Not Needed) applicable to the PDN connection on a per-EPS bearer basis. In turn, the MME informs the eNB.
To support URSP Provisioning in EPS, during Initial Attach with default PDN connection establishment procedure in EPS, the UE provides the "Indication of URSP Provisioning Support in EPS" in the PCO or in the ePCO in the PDN connectivity request as described in clause 5.17.8 of TS 23.501. If the SMF+PGW-C supports URSP Provisioning in EPS and the ePCO capability, it provides the "Indication of URSP Provisioning Support in EPS" in the ePCO in the Create Session Response. If the UE receives the "Indication of URSP Provisioning Support in EPS" in the ePCO from SMF+PGW-C provided in the PDN Connectivity Accept message, the UE initiates the UE requested bearer resource modification procedure and includes the UE Policy Container in the ePCO in the Request Bearer Resource Modification message, see clause 4.11.0a.10. If the default PDN connection is not established during Initial Attach procedure, the aforementioned procedure happens during the first request for PDN connectivity. If the negotiation of the support of URSP provisioning in EPS fails for the first PDN connection the UE may retry the aforementioned procedure successively for the next PDN connectivity requests until it succeeds for one of them as specified in clause 5.17.8 of TS 23.501 When the UE receives an indication of URSP provisioning support in EPS in the PDN Connectivity Accept message or in PDU Session Establishment Accept (as described in clause 4.11.5.3) and this PDN connection or the corresponding transferred PDN connection after 5GS to EPS handover is not released, then for any subsequent PDN connectivity requests the UE does not include an indication of URSP Provisioning Support in EPS.
To avoid the need for identifier coordination between MMEs, AMFs and SGSNs, the MME provides to the eNB its served GUMMEIs by separating the values between native MME GUMMEI values, values mapped from AMF and values mapped from SGSN.
EAP-based secondary authentication and authorization at PDU Session establishment is supported as defined in clause 4.3.2.3. EAP-based secondary authentication and authorization at PDN connection establishment is supported as defined in Annex H.
This clause 4.11.0a.7 defines the support of secondary authorization over EPS without EAP-based authentication when one of the UE, the 5GC and the DN does not support (or is configured not to use) the mechanisms defined in Annex H.
If secondary authentication and authorization has been performed for the PDU Session while the UE was in 5GS and the UE has moved to EPS, the following applies:
DN-AAA re-authorization (without re-authentication signalling) can be performed even when the UE is in EPS, e.g. to provide new parameters from the DN-AAA Server to SMF+PGW-C.
Re-authentication cannot be performed while the UE is in EPS because there is no support of the related signalling in EPS. In case the SMF+PGW-C receives a re-authentication request from the DN-AAA, the SMF+PGW-C informs the DN-AAA Server that the UE is not available for re-authentication at the moment. The SMF+PGW-C should not initiate PDN connection release at this point: the DN-AAA decides the actions to take, based on the reply from SMF+PGW-C and local policy which may also trigger a DN-AAA Server request to release the PDU Session/PDN connection of the UE.
When 5G NAS (i.e. N1 mode) capability is (re-)enabled, the UE triggers Tracking Area Update procedure as specified in clause 5.3.3.0 of TS 23.401.
If the MME determines that interworking with 5GS is changed to Supported and if the MME has selected a standalone PGW, the MME may initiate PDN disconnection with reactivation required as specified in clause 5.10.3 of TS 23.401 at the end of the tracking area update procedure.
If a UE disables its support of N1 mode and moves from 5GS to EPS, the UE and the SMF+PGW-C maintain the mapped 5GS parameters for PDU session(s) that are transferred to EPS.
If the SMF+PGW-C has registered with the UDM, the SMF+PGW-C shall deregister with UDM (using Nudm_UECM_Deregistration) during the PDN Connection Release procedure.
To support URSP Provisioning in EPS, the following enhancement to clause 5.4.5 of TS 23.401 applies:
Steps 1, if the UE received the Indication of URSP Provisioning Support in EPS in ePCO from SMF+PGW-C in the PDN Connectivity Accept message (as described in clause 4.11.0a.5), the UE includes the UE Policy Container ePCO in the Request Bearer Resource Modification message.
Step 4 (replaced by SM Policy Association Modification procedure as described in clause 4.11.0a.2a.2.1), SMF+PGW-C forwards the UE Policy Container received from the UE to the PCF for the PDU Session, which triggers UE Policy Association establishment as specified in clause 4.11.0a.2a.5.
To support URSP Provisioning in EPS, the following enhancement to clause 5.4.3 of TS 23.401 applies:
Step 1 The PCF provides UE Policy Container, which is received from the PCF for the UE as specified in clause 4.11.0a.2a.6, to the SMF+PGW-C in (PCF-initiated) IP-CAN Session Modification procedure as specified in clause 4.11.0a.3.
Steps 2~5 The UE Policy Container in ePCO is sent by the SMF+PGW-C to the UE via SGW and MME
Steps 6~9 The UE sends UE Policy delivery result to the SMF+PGW-C via MME and SGW.
Steps 10 The SMF+PGW-C reports the UE Policy delivery result to the PCF as specified in clause 4.11.0a.2a.2.3.