Content for TR 38.835 Word version: 18.0.1
1…
4…
5…
6
A
B…
B.1.2
B.1.3
B.1.4
B.1.5
B.1.6
B.1.7
B.1.8
B.1.9
B.1.10
B.2…
B.2.2
B.2.3
B.2.4
B.2.5
B.2.6
B.2.7
B.2.8
B.2.9
B.2.10
B.2.11
B.2.12
B.2.13
B.2.14
B.2.15
B.2.16
B.2.17
B.2.18
C…
B.2.11 PDCCH skipping and interaction with HARQ retransmission p. 96
This clause captures evaluation results for PDCCH skipping and interaction with HARQ retransmission:
- Ericsson, vivo, MediaTek and ZTE evaluated the scheme that UE can resume PDCCH monitoring during the time when DRX retransmission timer is running if NACK is transmitted after PDCCH skipping has started.
| source | data row index | Tdoc source | Power saving scheme | CDRX cycle (ms) | ODT (ms) | IAT (ms) | Load H/L | #UE /cell | floor (Capacity) | % of DL satisfied UE | % of UL satisfied UE | % of DL + UL satisfied UE | Capacity gain (%) | Mean PSG of all UEs (%) | Mean PSG of satisfied UEs (%) | Additional Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ericsson | 35 | R1-2210922 | Always On | - | - | - | H | 8 | 8 | 90.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Note 1 | ||
| Ericsson | 36 | R1-2210922 | R15/16 DRX (Long DRX) | 10 | 8 | 4 | H | 8 | 8 | 86.9% | -3.6% | 2.6% | 2.7% | Note 1 | ||
| Ericsson | 37 | R1-2210922 | R15/16 DRX (Short DRX) | 4 | 2 | 4 | H | 8 | 8 | 80.2% | -11.0% | 6.1% | 6.1% | Note 1 | ||
| Ericsson | 38 | R1-2210922 | Matched CDRX | 16.6 | 10 | 4 | H | 8 | 8 | 85.5% | -5.1% | 7.2% | 7.1% | Note 1,2 | ||
| Ericsson | 39 | R1-2210922 | Matched CDRX | 17/17/16 | 10 | 4 | H | 8 | 8 | 86.4% | -4.1% | 7.6% | 7.5% | Note 1 | ||
| Ericsson | 40 | R1-2210922 | PDCCH skipping & matched CDRX | 16.6 | 10 | 4 | H | 8 | 8 | 84.7% | -6.0% | 7.6% | 7.6% | Note1,2 | ||
| MTK | 18 | R1-2212253 | AlwaysOn - baseline | - | - | - | H | 8 | 8 | 92.14% | 0.0% | 0.0% | ||||
| MTK | 19 | R1-2212253 | R17 PDCCH skipping | - | - | - | H | 8 | 8 | 62% | -32.7% | 3.96% | Note3 | |||
| MTK | 20 | R1-2212253 | R17 PDCCH skipping | - | - | - | H | 8 | 8 | 85.62% | -7.1% | 6.39% | Note4 | |||
| MTK | 21 | R1-2212253 | Enh: PDCCH skipping | - | - | - | H | 8 | 8 | 89.05% | -3.4% | 17.66% | Note5 | |||
|
NOTE 1:
the DL traffic has a second flow for audio with 30ms PDB
NOTE 2:
Matched CDRX has (drx_offset=3, traffic_time_offset=2 ms, drx-LongCycle=16 ms)
NOTE 3:
PDCCH skipping duration is 3ms
NOTE 4:
PDCCH skipping duration is 2ms
NOTE 5:
PDCCH skipping duration is 12ms, UE resumes PDCCH monitoring if UE transmits NACK
|
||||||||||||||||
Based on the evaluation results in Table B.2.11-1, the following observations can be made:
-
For FR1, DL + UL joint evaluation, DU, high load, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps with 10ms PDB and DL audio, it is observed from Ericsson that:
-
eCDRX as performance reference provides:
- mean power saving gain of 7.4% in the range of 7.2% to 7.6% for all UEs
- mean capacity gain of -4.60% in the range of -5.1% to -4.1%
-
PDCCH skipping enhancement with eCDRX provides:
- power saving gain of 7.6% for all UEs
- capacity gain of -6.0%
-
eCDRX as performance reference provides:
-
For FR1, DL + UL joint evaluation, DU, high load, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps with 10ms PDB, it is observed from MediaTek that:
-
R17 PDCCH skipping performance reference provides:
- mean power saving gain of 5.18% in the range of 3.96% to 6.39% for all UEs
- mean capacity gain of -19.90% in the range of -32.7% to -7.1%
-
enhanced PDCCH skipping provides:
- power saving gain of 17.66%
- capacity gain of -3.4%
-
R17 PDCCH skipping performance reference provides:
| source | data row index | Tdoc source | Power saving scheme | CDRX cycle (ms) | ODT (ms) | IAT (ms) | Load H/L | #UE /cell | floor (Capacity) | % of satisfied UE | Capacity gain (%) | Mean PSG of all UEs (%) | Mean PSG of satisfied UEs (%) | Additional Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTK | 1 | R1-2209517 | Always On | - | - | - | H | 12 | 12 | 92.54% | 0.0% | 0% | ||
| MTK | 2 | R1-2209517 | Rel-17 PDCCH skipping 5ms | - | - | - | H | 12 | 12 | 62.94% | -32.0% | 14.11% | Note 1 | |
| MTK | 3 | R1-2209517 | Rel-17 PDCCH skipping | - | - | - | H | 12 | 12 | 83.10% | -10.2% | 11.13% | Note 2 | |
| MTK | 4 | R1-2209517 | Rel-17 PDCCH skipping | - | - | - | H | 12 | 12 | 87.78% | -5.1% | 8.64% | Note 3 | |
| MTK | 5 | R1-2209517 | PDCCH skipping enhancement | - | - | - | H | 12 | 12 | 84.37% | -8.8% | 29.60% | Note 4 | |
| MTK | 5 | R1-2209517 | PDCCH skipping enhancement | - | - | - | H | 12 | 12 | 84.37% | -8.8% | 20.78% | Note 4, 5 | |
|
NOTE 1:
PDCCH skipping duration is 5ms
NOTE 2:
PDCCH skipping duration is 4ms
NOTE 3:
PDCCH skipping duration is 3ms
NOTE 4:
PDCCH skipping duration is 12ms, UE resumes PDCCH monitoring if UE transmits NACK
NOTE 5:
PSG is calculated w.r.t. Rel-17 PDCCH skipping with duration equal to 3ms
|
||||||||||||||
Based on the evaluation results in Table B.2.11-2, the following observations can be made:
-
For FR1, DL + UL joint evaluation, DU, high load, CG 30Mbps traffic at 60fps with 15ms PDB, it is observed from MediaTek that:
-
Rel-17 PDCCH skipping performance reference provides:
- mean power saving gain of 11.29% in the range of 8.64% to 14.11% for all UEs
- mean capacity gain of -15.77% in the range of -32.0% to -5.1%
-
enhanced PDCCH skipping provides:
- mean power saving gain of 25.19% in the range of 20.78% to 29.60% for all UEs
- capacity gain of -8.8%
-
Rel-17 PDCCH skipping performance reference provides:
| source | data row index | Tdoc source | Power saving scheme | CDRX cycle (ms) | ODT (ms) | IAT (ms) | Load H/L | #UE /cell | floor (Capacity) | % of satisfied UE | Capacity gain (%) | Mean PSG of all UEs (%) | Mean PSG of satisfied UEs (%) | Additional Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTK | 6 | R1-2209517 | Always On | - | - | - | H | 8 | 8 | 97.02% | 0.0% | 0% | - | |
| MTK | 7 | R1-2209517 | Rel-17 PDCCH skipping 5ms | - | - | - | H | 8 | 8 | 72.38% | -25.4% | 8.62% | - | Note 1 |
| MTK | 8 | R1-2209517 | Rel-17 PDCCH skipping | - | - | - | H | 8 | 8 | 93.10% | -4.0% | 5.27% | - | Note 2 |
| MTK | 9 | R1-2209517 | PDCCH skipping enhancement | - | - | - | H | 8 | 8 | 96.08% | -1.0% | 31.77% | - | Note 3 |
| MTK | 9 | R1-2209517 | PDCCH skipping enhancement | - | - | - | H | 8 | 8 | 96.08% | -1.0% | 27.97% | - | Note 3, 4 |
| MTK | 14 | R1-2209517 | CDRX baseline | 16 | 10 | 5 | H | 8 | 8 | 33.10% | -65.9% | 0.0% | - | |
| MTK | 15 | R1-2209517 | Rel-17 PDCCH skipping | 16 | 10 | 5 | H | 8 | 8 | 16.50% | -83.0% | 6.04% | - | Note 1 |
| MTK | 16 | R1-2209517 | Rel-17 PDCCH skipping | 16 | 10 | 5 | H | 8 | 8 | 3.30% | -96.6% | 9.41% | - | Note 2 |
| MTK | 17 | R1-2209517 | PDCCH skipping enhancement | 16 | 10 | 5 | H | 8 | 8 | 21.70% | -77.6% | 23.27% | - | Note 3 |
| Ericsson | 1 | R1-2210922 | Always On | - | - | - | H | 8 | 8 | 91.7% | 0.0% | 0% | 0% | |
| Ericsson | 2 | R1-2210922 | R15/16 DRX (Long DRX) | 10 | 8 | 4 | H | 8 | 8 | 86.9% | -5.2% | 4.3% | 4.9% | |
| Ericsson | 3 | R1-2210922 | R15/16 DRX (Short DRX) | 4 | 2 | 4 | H | 8 | 8 | 78.2% | -14.7% | 10.4% | 11.0% | |
| Ericsson | 4 | R1-2210922 | Matched CDRX | 16.6 | 10 | 4 | H | 8 | 8 | 87.2% | -4.9% | 10.5% | 11.4% | Note 5 |
| Ericsson | 5 | R1-2210922 | Matched CDRX | 17/17/16 | 10 | 4 | H | 8 | 8 | 87.0% | -5.1% | 10.1% | 10.5% | |
| Ericsson | 6 | R1-2210922 | PDCCH skipping & matched CDRX | 16.6 | 10 | 4 | H | 8 | 8 | 87.3% | -4.8% | 15.8% | 16.0% | Note 5 |
| Ericsson | 1 | R1-2210922 | Always On | - | - | - | L | 2 | 8 | 100% | 0.0% | 0% | 0% | |
| Ericsson | 2 | R1-2210922 | R15/16 DRX (Long DRX) | 10 | 8 | 4 | L | 2 | 8 | 100% | 0.0% | 4.8% | 4.8% | |
| Ericsson | 3 | R1-2210922 | R15/16 DRX (Short DRX) | 4 | 2 | 4 | L | 2 | 8 | 100% | 0.0% | 12.4% | 12.4% | |
| Ericsson | 4 | R1-2210922 | Matched CDRX | 16.6 | 10 | 4 | L | 2 | 8 | 100% | 0.0% | 12.8% | 12.8% | Note 5 |
| Ericsson | 5 | R1-2210922 | Matched CDRX | 17/17/16 | 10 | 4 | L | 2 | 8 | 100% | 0.0% | 12.5% | 12.5% | |
| Ericsson | 6 | R1-2210922 | PDCCH skipping & matched CDRX | 16.6 | 10 | 4 | L | 2 | 8 | 100% | 0.0% | 22.5% | 22.5% | Note 5 |
|
NOTE 1:
PDCCH skipping duration is 3ms
NOTE 2:
PDCCH skipping duration is 2ms
NOTE 3:
PDCCH skipping duration is 12ms, UE resumes PDCCH monitoring if UE transmits NACK
NOTE 4:
PSG is calculated w.r.t. Rel-17 PDCCH skipping with duration equal to 2ms
NOTE 5:
Matched CDRX has (drx_offset=3, traffic_time_offset=2 ms, drx-LongCycle=16 ms)
|
||||||||||||||
Based on the evaluation results in Table B.2.11-3, the following observations can be made:
-
For FR1, DL only evaluation, DU, high load, DRX not configured, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps with 10ms PDB, it is observed from MediaTek that:
-
R17 PDCCH skipping as performance reference provides:
- mean power saving gain of 6.95% in the range of 5.27% to 8.62% for all UEs
- mean capacity gain of -14.70% in the range of -25.4% to -4.0%
-
enhanced PDCCH skipping provides:
- mean power saving gain of 29.87% in the range of 27.97% to 31.77% for all UEs
- capacity gain of -1.0%
-
R17 PDCCH skipping as performance reference provides:
-
For FR1, DL only evaluation, DU, high load, DRX configured, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps with 10ms PDB, it is observed from MediaTek that:
-
R17 PDCCH skipping as performance reference provides:
- mean power saving gain of 7.73% in the range of 6.04% to 9.41% for all UEs
- mean capacity gain of -89.80% in the range of -96.6% to -83.0%
-
enhanced PDCCH skipping provides:
- power saving gain of 23.27%
- capacity gain of -77.6%
-
R17 PDCCH skipping as performance reference provides:
-
For FR1, DL only evaluation, DU, high load, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps with 10ms PDB, it is observed from Ericsson that:
-
eCDRX as performance reference provides:
- mean power saving gain of 10.3% in the range of 10.1% to 10.5% for all UEs
- mean capacity gain of -5.0% in the range of -5.1% to -4.9%
-
PDCCH skipping enhancement with eCDRX provides:
- power saving gain of 15.8% for all UEs
- capacity gain of -4.8%
-
eCDRX as performance reference provides:
-
For FR1, DL only evaluation, DU, low load, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps with 10ms PDB, it is observed from Ericsson that:
-
eCDRX as performance reference provides:
- mean power saving gain of 12.65% in the range of 12.5% to 12.8% for all UEs
- capacity gain of 0%
-
PDCCH skipping enhancement with eCDRX provides:
- power saving gain of 22.5% for all UEs
- capacity gain of 0%
-
eCDRX as performance reference provides:
| source | data row index | Tdoc source | Power saving scheme | CDRX cycle (ms) | ODT (ms) | IAT (ms) | Load H/L | #UE /cell | floor (Capacity) | % of satisfied UE | Capacity gain (%) | Mean PSG of all UEs (%) | Mean PSG of satisfied UEs (%) | Additional Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZTE | 46 | R1-2211905 | Always on | - | - | - | H | 7 | 7 | 90% | 0.00% | 0% | - | Note1 |
| ZTE | 47 | R1-2211905 | Aligned CDRX | Aligned every 50ms | 14 | 5 | H | 7 | 7 | 85% | -5.56% | 4.50% | - | Note1 |
| ZTE | 49 | R1-2211905 | PDCCH Skipping (duration = 2ms,4ms) | Aligned every 50ms | 14 | 5 | H | 7 | 7 | 74% | -17.78% | 9.6% | - | Note1 |
| ZTE | 50 | R1-2211905 | PDCCH skipping with dummy grant (duration = 4ms,8ms) | Aligned every 50ms | 14 | 5 | H | 7 | 7 | 80% | -11.11% | 12% | - | Note1 |
| ZTE | 51 | R1-2211905 | PDCCH Skipping with retransmission (duration = 3ms,7ms) | Aligned every 50ms | 14 | 5 | H | 7 | 7 | 84% | -6.67% | 16% | - | Note1 |
| MTK | 10 | R1-2209517 | Always On | - | - | - | H | 4 | 4 | 95.71% | 0.0% | 0% | - | |
| MTK | 11 | R1-2209517 | Rel-17 PDCCH skipping | - | - | - | H | 4 | 4 | 67.38% | -29.6% | 7.97% | - | Note2 |
| MTK | 12 | R1-2209517 | Rel-17 PDCCH skipping | - | - | - | H | 4 | 4 | 89.52% | -6.5% | 4.90% | - | Note3 |
| MTK | 13 | R1-2209517 | PDCCH skipping enhancement | - | - | - | H | 4 | 4 | 93.10% | -2.7% | 29.31% | - | Note4 |
| MTK | 13 | R1-2209517 | PDCCH skipping enhancement | - | - | - | H | 4 | 4 | 93.10% | -2.7% | 25.68% | - | Note4,5 |
|
NOTE 1:
Jitter range = [-8,8]ms, STD = 5ms
NOTE 2:
PDCCH skipping duration is 3ms
NOTE 3:
PDCCH skipping duration is 2ms
NOTE 4:
PDCCH skipping duration is 12ms, UE resumes PDCCH monitoring 5ms if UE transmits NACK
NOTE 5:
PSG is calculated w.r.t. Rel-17 PDCCH skipping with duration equal to 2ms
|
||||||||||||||
Based on the evaluation results in Table B.2.11-4, the following observations can be made:
-
For FR1, DL only evaluation, DU, high load, VR 45Mbps traffic at 60fps with 10ms PDB, it is observed from ZTE that:
-
R17 PDCCH skipping + eCDRX as performance reference provides:
- mean power saving gain of 10.80% in the range of 9.6% to 12% for all UEs
- mean capacity gain of -14.45% in the range of -17.78% to -11.11%
-
PDCCH skipping with retransmission enhancement + eCDRX provides:
- power saving gain of 16% for all UEs with
- capacity gain of -6.67%
-
R17 PDCCH skipping + eCDRX as performance reference provides:
-
For FR1, DL only evaluation, DU, high load, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps with 10ms PDB, it is observed from MediaTek:
-
R17 PDCCH skipping as performance reference provides:
- mean power saving gain of 6.44% in the range of 4.90% to 7.97% for all UEs
- mean capacity gain of -18.05% in the range of -29.6% to -6.5%
-
enhanced PDCCH skipping without DRX provides:
- mean power saving gain of 27.50% in the range of 25.68% to 29.31% for all UEs
- capacity gain of -2.70%
-
R17 PDCCH skipping as performance reference provides:
| source | data row index | Tdoc source | Power saving scheme | CDRX cycle (ms) | ODT (ms) | IAT (ms) | Load H/L | #UE /cell | floor (Capacity) | % of satisfied UE | Capacity gain (%) | Mean PSG of all UEs (%) | Mean PSG of satisfied UEs (%) | Additional Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZTE | 39 | R1-2211905 | Always on | - | - | - | H | 7 | 7 | 90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | - | Note1 |
| ZTE | 41 | R1-2211905 | Aligned CDRX | Aligned every 50ms | 14 | 5 | H | 7 | 7 | 88.10% | -2.11% | 4.60% | - | Note1 |
| ZTE | 40 | R1-2211905 | Aligned CDRX | Aligned every 50ms | 12 | 5 | H | 7 | 7 | 80% | -11.11% | 9.46% | - | Note1 |
| ZTE | 44 | R1-2211905 | PDCCH Skipping (duration = 2ms,4ms) | Aligned every 50ms | 14 | 5 | H | 7 | 7 | 72.62% | -19.31% | 10.84% | - | Note1 |
| ZTE | 43 | R1-2211905 | PDCCH skipping with dummy grant (duration = 4ms,8ms) | Aligned every 50ms | 14 | 5 | H | 7 | 7 | 80.95% | -10.06% | 13.03% | - | Note1 |
| ZTE | 45 | R1-2211905 | PDCCH Skipping with retransmission (duration = 3ms,7ms) | Aligned every 50ms | 14 | 5 | H | 7 | 7 | 84.52% | -6.1% | 16.31% | - | Note1 |
|
NOTE 1:
Jitter range = [-8,8]ms, STD = 5ms
|
||||||||||||||
Based on the evaluation results in Table B.2.11-5, the following observations can be made:
-
For FR1, DL only evaluation, InH, high load, VR 45Mbps traffic at 60fps with 10ms PDB, it is observed from ZTE that:
-
R17 PDCCH skipping + eCDRX performance reference provides:
- mean power saving gain of 11.94% in the range of 10.84% to 13.03% for all UEs
- mean capacity gain of -14.69% in the range of -19.31% to -10.06%.
-
PDCCH skipping with retransmission enhancement + eCDRX provides:
- power saving gain of 16.31% for all UEs
- capacity gain of -6.1%.
-
R17 PDCCH skipping + eCDRX performance reference provides:
| source | data row index | Tdoc source | Power saving scheme | CDRX cycle (ms) | ODT (ms) | IAT (ms) | Load H/L | #UE /cell | floor (Capacity) | % of satisfied UE | Capacity gain (%) | Mean PSG of all UEs (%) | Mean PSG of satisfied UEs (%) | Additional Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Always On | - | - | - | L | 5 | 10 | 100% | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | Note1 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Always On | - | - | - | L | 5 | 10 | 100% | 0.0% | 0.0% | - | Note2 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | R17 PDCCH monitoring adaptation | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | L | 5 | 10 | 100% | 0.0% | 23.36% | - | Note1, 4,5, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | R17 PDCCH monitoring adaptation | 16.67 | 16 | 4 | L | 5 | 10 | 100% | 0.0% | 15.79% | - | Note2, 4,5, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Enhanced PDCCH skipping with HARQ interaction | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | L | 5 | 10 | 100% | 0.0% | 37.13% | - | Note1, 3,5, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Enhanced PDCCH skipping with HARQ interaction | 16.67 | 16 | 4 | L | 5 | 10 | 100% | 0.0% | 27.77% | - | Note2, 3,5, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | LP-WUS scheme and enhanced PDCCH skipping with HARQ interaction | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | L | 5 | 10 | 100% | 0.0% | 43.84% | - | Note1, 3,8, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | LP-WUS scheme and enhanced PDCCH skipping with HARQ interaction | 16.67 | 16 | 4 | L | 5 | 10 | 100% | 0.0% | 41.90% | - | Note2, 3,8, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Always On | - | - | - | H | 10 | 10 | 92.50% | 0.0% | - | - | Note1 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | R17 PDCCH monitoring adaptation | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 1.11% | -98.80% | 35.21% | - | Note1,3,5, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | R17 PDCCH monitoring adaptation | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 92.22% | -0.30% | 19.28% | - | Note1,4,5, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Enhanced PDCCH skipping with HARQ interaction | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 92.22% | -0.30% | 32.18% | - | Note1, 3,5, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | LP-WUS scheme and enhanced PDCCH skipping with HARQ interaction | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 92.22% | -0.30% | 38.47% | - | Note1, 3,8, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Always On | - | - | - | H | 10 | 10 | 97.45% | 0.0% | - | - | Note1,7 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | R17 PDCCH monitoring adaptation | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 2.22% | -97.72% | 35.21% | - | Note1,3,5,7, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | R17 PDCCH monitoring adaptation | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 97.45% | 0% | 19.28% | - | Note1,4,5,7, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Enhanced PDCCH skipping with HARQ interaction | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 97.45% | 0% | 32.18% | - | Note1, 3,5,7, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Always On | - | - | - | H | 10 | 10 | 93.12% | 0.0% | - | - | Note1,6 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | R17 PDCCH monitoring adaptation | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 2.08% | -97.77% | 32.77% | - | Note1,3,5,6, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | R17 PDCCH monitoring adaptation | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 92.78% | -0.37% | 19.48% | - | Note1,4,5,6, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Enhanced PDCCH skipping with HARQ interaction | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 92.78% | -0.37% | 32.49% | - | Note1, 3,5,6, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Always On | - | - | - | H | 10 | 10 | 97.45% | 0.0% | - | - | Note1,6,7 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | R17 PDCCH monitoring adaptation | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 94.91% | -2.61% | 32.77% | - | Note1,3,5,6,7, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | R17 PDCCH monitoring adaptation | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 97.45% | 0% | 19.48% | - | Note1,4,5,6,7, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Enhanced PDCCH skipping with HARQ interaction | 16.67 | 8 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 97.45% | 0% | 32.49% | - | Note1, 3,5,6,7, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Always On | - | - | - | H | 10 | 10 | 91.83% | 0.0% | - | - | Note2 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | R17 PDCCH monitoring adaptation | 16.67 | 16 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 91.05% | -0.90% | 12.26% | - | Note2,4,5, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | Enhanced PDCCH skipping with HARQ interaction | 16.67 | 16 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 91.20% | -0.69% | 23.67% | - | Note2, 3,5, 9 | |
| vivo | R1-2211024 | LP-WUS scheme and enhanced PDCCH skipping with HARQ interaction | 16.67 | 16 | 4 | H | 10 | 10 | 91.20% | -0.69% | 37.20% | - | Note2, 3,8, 9 | |
|
NOTE 1:
jitter range = [-4, +4]ms, STD = 2ms
NOTE 2:
jitter range = [-8, +8]ms, STD = 5ms
NOTE 3:
the network indicates PDCCH skipping in the DCI that schedules the initial PDSCH transmission of the last DL packet of an XR traffic burst
NOTE 4:
PDCCH skipping is indicated in the DCI that schedules a dummy PDSCH after all the HARQ-ACK processes of transmissions have been completed
NOTE 5:
applying R17 sparse SSSG with PDCCH monitoring every 2 slots when DRX Onduration starts and switch to dense SSSG with PDCCH monitoring every 1 slot after detecting DCI scheduling XR traffic burst
NOTE 6:
initial BLER is reduced from 10% to 1%
NOTE 7:
satisfaction metric as 95% packet successful rate
NOTE 8:
the total relative power (including the power of both LP-WUR and main radio) for LP-WUS monitoring is 45 with no wake-up latency. The resource overhead for LP WUS is not considered.
NOTE 9:
PDCCH skipping durations include 10 ms, 16 ms
|
||||||||||||||
Based on the evaluation results in Table B.2.11-6, the following observations can be made:
-
For FR1, DL only evaluation, InH, low load, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps with 10ms PDB, it is observed from vivo that:
-
R17 PDCCH skipping + eCDRX performance reference provides:
- mean power saving gain of 19.58% in the range of 15.79% to 23.36% for all UEs
- capacity gain of 0%
-
Enhanced PDCCH skipping + eCDRX provides:
- mean power saving gain of 32.45% in the range of 27.77% to 37.13% for all UEs
- capacity gain of 0%
-
When LP-WUS is adopted, enhanced PDCCH skipping + eCDRX + LP-WUS provides:
- mean power saving gain of 42.87% in the range of 41.90% to 43.84% for all UEs
- capacity gain of 0%
-
R17 PDCCH skipping + eCDRX performance reference provides:
-
For FR1, DL only evaluation, InH, high load, VR 30Mbps traffic at 60fps with 10ms PDB, it is observed from vivo that:
-
R17 PDCCH skipping + eCDRX performance reference provides:
- mean power saving gain of 25.08% in the range of 12.26% to 35.21% for all UEs
- mean capacity gain of -33.16% in the range of -98.80% to 0.0%.
-
Enhanced PDCCH skipping + eCDRX provides:
- mean power saving gain of 30.60% in the range of 23.67% to 32.49% for all UEs
- mean capacity gain of -0.05% in the range of -0.37% to 0.0%.
-
When LP-WUS is adopted, enhanced PDCCH skipping + eCDRX provides:
- mean power saving gain of 37.84% in the range of 37.20% to 38.47% for all UEs
- mean capacity gain of -0.50% in the range of -0.69% to -0.30%.
-
R17 PDCCH skipping + eCDRX performance reference provides:
