Since the EAS may have service area restriction, once the UE is moving out of the current edge coverage, to keep service continuity, the application client needs to communicate with the CAS. The ACR can also be triggered in case of an overload situation or maintenance aspects in the S-EAS or EDN if no suitable target EAS is found as described in
clause 8.8.1.1 depending on the scenario. Service continuity between CAS and EAS is supported with CES, corresponding to the architecture options described in
clause 6.2d.
CAS(s) are registered in the CES via CLOUD-1 reference point which enables the CES to provide appropriate CAS to S-EAS or S-EES.
DNS can be used for CAS discovery by the UE.
The EES of the source EDN may interact with the CES via ECI-4 reference point and application context is transferred from source EAS to the CAS. Later, if the UE is moving to an area with edge coverage, the CES may interact with the EES in the target EDN via ECI-4 reference point and application context is transferred from the CAS to target EAS.
The following clauses describe ACR scenarios from edge to cloud.
The scenario described in
clause 8.8.2A.2 applies with the following differences:
-
After step 7, the S-EES relocates context to the CES. The relocation procedure re-uses the procedure described in clause 8.9.2.3 where T-EES is replaced by CES.
-
During post-ACR clean up, the CAS triggers ACR status update towards the CES in order to finish ACR.
The scenario described in
clause 8.8.2A.3 applies with the following differences:
-
After step 4, the S-EES relocates context to the CES. The relocation procedure re-uses the procedure described in clause 8.9.2.3 where T-EES is replaced by CES.
-
During post-ACR clean up, the CAS triggers ACR status update towards the CES in order to finish ACR.
The scenario described in
clause 8.8.2.4 applies with the following differences:
-
The CES replaces the T-EES and the CAS replaces the T-EAS.
The scenario described in
clause 8.8.2.5 applies with the following differences:
-
The CES replaces the T-EES and the CAS replaces the T-EAS.
The following clauses describe ACR scenarios from cloud to edge.
The scenario described in
clause 8.8.2.2 applies with the following differences:
-
The CES replaces the S-EES and the CAS replaces the S-EAS.
-
The EEC subscribes to ECS with service provisioning subscription for ACR detection and service provisioning in step 3 is skipped.
The scenario described in
clause 8.8.2.3 applies with the following differences:
-
The CES replaces the S-EES and the CAS replaces the S-EAS.
-
The EEC subscribes to ECS with service provisioning subscription for ACR detection and service provisioning in step 3 is skipped.
The scenario described in
clause 8.8.2.4 applies with the following differences:
-
The CES replaces the S-EES and the CAS replaces the S-EAS.
-
The CAS subscribes to CES with ACR management events with "ACR monitoring" for ACR detection and step 3 T-EAS discovery is skipped.
The scenario described in
clause 8.8.2.5 applies with the following differences:
-
The CES replaces the S-EES and the CAS replaces the S-EAS.
-
The ACR is only detected by the CES. The CAS subscribes to CES with ACR management events with "ACR facilitation" for ACR detection and step 5a T-EAS discovery is skipped.