UE needs to support the asymmetric bandwidth combinations where UL CBW is SmallerCBW and DL CBW is WiderCBW. The asymmetric UL and DL channel bandwidth combination set should be specified in the specification
TS 38.101-1.
gNB has to support the irregular channel BW. It is up to the network implementation how it can be implemented, e.g. through a new channel bandwidth, or through RF combining of 2 existing regular channel bandwidths.
From network perspective:
For gNB, no new filter for RF channel is needed. The CA implementation can be reused. The only update is to allow the configuration that the two carriers can be partially overlapped by adjusting the channel spacing. The network can prevent collisions between the two component carriers.
For UE, there is no impact and fully backwards compatible.
From UE perspective:
For gNB, the two RF carriers aggregated by the UE would need to be time-aligned by the gNB to at least the same level required for existing intra-band contiguous CA (
TS 38.104 Timing Adjustment Error) to allow UE reception. It is FFS as to whether finer timing alignment would be required.
For UE, it is optional support in DL only. For the UE supports DL intra-band non-contiguous CA with corresponding channel bandwidth(s), overlapping CA can be considered by support the configuration with partially overlapping carriers. And in the case no new channel filter for UE is needed.
For overlapping CA solution, the legacy channel bandwidth should be supported, hence the minimum guardband should not be less than the minimum guardband of lower UE channel bandwidth than operator licensed bandwidth. To support legacy UEs, channel raster should be applied for each UE channels. And in order to simplify the resource schedule and make the use of single SSB (for irregular bandwidths larger than 10MHz) for CA operation, RB alignment is required.
Table 6.3.4-1 shows the channel spacing and spectrum utilization for the example channel bandwidths assuming symmetric CA channel bandwidth.