RFC 4836
Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Medium Attachment Units (MAUs)
5. IANA-Maintained MAU TC Definitions
IANA-MAU-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-IDENTITY, mib-2 FROM SNMPv2-SMI TEXTUAL-CONVENTION FROM SNMPv2-TC ; ianaMauMIB MODULE-IDENTITY LAST-UPDATED "200704210000Z" -- April 21, 2007 ORGANIZATION "IANA" CONTACT-INFO " Internet Assigned Numbers Authority Postal: ICANN 4676 Admiralty Way, Suite 330 Marina del Rey, CA 90292 Tel: +1-310-823-9358 EMail: iana@iana.org" DESCRIPTION "This MIB module defines dot3MauType OBJECT-IDENTITIES and IANAifMauListBits, IANAifMauMediaAvailable, IANAifMauAutoNegCapBits, and IANAifJackType
TEXTUAL-CONVENTIONs, specifying enumerated values of the
ifMauTypeListBits, ifMauMediaAvailable / rpMauMediaAvailable,
ifMauAutoNegCapabilityBits / ifMauAutoNegCapAdvertisedBits /
ifMauAutoNegCapReceivedBits and ifJackType / rpJackType objects
respectively, defined in the MAU-MIB.
It is intended that each new MAU type, Media Availability
state, Auto Negotiation capability and/or Jack type defined by
the IEEE 802.3 working group and approved for publication in a
revision of IEEE Std 802.3 will be added to this MIB module,
provided that it is suitable for being managed by the base
objects in the MAU-MIB. An Expert Review, as defined in
RFC 2434 [RFC2434], is REQUIRED for such additions.
The following reference is used throughout this MIB module:
[IEEE802.3] refers to:
IEEE Std 802.3, 2005 Edition: 'IEEE Standard for
Information technology - Telecommunications and information
exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area
networks - Specific requirements -
Part 3: Carrier sense multiple access with collision
detection (CSMA/CD) access method and physical layer
specifications'.
This reference should be updated as appropriate when new
MAU types, Media Availability states, Auto Negotiation
capabilities, and/or Jack types are added to this MIB module.
Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007).
The initial version of this MIB module was published in
RFC 4836; for full legal notices see the RFC itself.
Supplementary information may be available at:
http://www.ietf.org/copyrights/ianamib.html"
REVISION "200704210000Z" -- April 21, 2007
DESCRIPTION "Initial version of this MIB as published in
RFC 4836."
::= { mib-2 154 }
-- Textual Conventions
IANAifMauTypeListBits ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This data type is used as the syntax of the ifMauTypeListBits
object in the (updated) definition of MAU-MIB's ifMauTable.
The most recent version of this textual convention is available
in the online version of this MIB module on the IANA web site.
Requests for new values should be made to IANA via email
(iana@iana.org).
Note that changes in this textual convention SHALL be
synchronized with relevant changes in the dot3MauType
OBJECT-IDENTITIES."
REFERENCE
"[IEEE802.3], Section 30.5.1.1.2"
SYNTAX BITS {
bOther(0), -- other or unknown
bAUI(1), -- AUI
b10base5(2), -- 10BASE-5
bFoirl(3), -- FOIRL
b10base2(4), -- 10BASE-2
b10baseT(5), -- 10BASE-T duplex mode unknown
b10baseFP(6), -- 10BASE-FP
b10baseFB(7), -- 10BASE-FB
b10baseFL(8), -- 10BASE-FL duplex mode unknown
b10broad36(9), -- 10BROAD36
b10baseTHD(10), -- 10BASE-T half duplex mode
b10baseTFD(11), -- 10BASE-T full duplex mode
b10baseFLHD(12), -- 10BASE-FL half duplex mode
b10baseFLFD(13), -- 10BASE-FL full duplex mode
b100baseT4(14), -- 100BASE-T4
b100baseTXHD(15), -- 100BASE-TX half duplex mode
b100baseTXFD(16), -- 100BASE-TX full duplex mode
b100baseFXHD(17), -- 100BASE-FX half duplex mode
b100baseFXFD(18), -- 100BASE-FX full duplex mode
b100baseT2HD(19), -- 100BASE-T2 half duplex mode
b100baseT2FD(20), -- 100BASE-T2 full duplex mode
b1000baseXHD(21), -- 1000BASE-X half duplex mode
b1000baseXFD(22), -- 1000BASE-X full duplex mode
b1000baseLXHD(23), -- 1000BASE-LX half duplex mode
b1000baseLXFD(24), -- 1000BASE-LX full duplex mode
b1000baseSXHD(25), -- 1000BASE-SX half duplex mode
b1000baseSXFD(26), -- 1000BASE-SX full duplex mode
b1000baseCXHD(27), -- 1000BASE-CX half duplex mode
b1000baseCXFD(28), -- 1000BASE-CX full duplex mode
b1000baseTHD(29), -- 1000BASE-T half duplex mode
b1000baseTFD(30), -- 1000BASE-T full duplex mode
b10GbaseX(31), -- 10GBASE-X
b10GbaseLX4(32), -- 10GBASE-LX4
b10GbaseR(33), -- 10GBASE-R
b10GbaseER(34), -- 10GBASE-ER
b10GbaseLR(35), -- 10GBASE-LR
b10GbaseSR(36), -- 10GBASE-SR
b10GbaseW(37), -- 10GBASE-W
b10GbaseEW(38), -- 10GBASE-EW
b10GbaseLW(39), -- 10GBASE-LW
b10GbaseSW(40), -- 10GBASE-SW
-- new since RFC 3636
b10GbaseCX4(41), -- 10GBASE-CX4
b2BaseTL(42), -- 2BASE-TL
b10PassTS(43), -- 10PASS-TS
b100BaseBX10D(44), -- 100BASE-BX10D
b100BaseBX10U(45), -- 100BASE-BX10U
b100BaseLX10(46), -- 100BASE-LX10
b1000BaseBX10D(47), -- 1000BASE-BX10D
b1000BaseBX10U(48), -- 1000BASE-BX10U
b1000BaseLX10(49), -- 1000BASE-LX10
b1000BasePX10D(50), -- 1000BASE-PX10D
b1000BasePX10U(51), -- 1000BASE-PX10U
b1000BasePX20D(52), -- 1000BASE-PX20D
b1000BasePX20U(53) -- 1000BASE-PX20U
}
IANAifMauMediaAvailable ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This data type is used as the syntax of the
ifMauMediaAvailable and rpMauMediaAvailable objects in the
(updated) definition of MAU-MIB's ifMauTable and rpMauTable
respectively.
Possible values are:
other(1) - undefined (not listed below)
unknown(2) - MAU's true state is unknown; e.g.,
during initialization
available(3) - link, light, or loopback is normal
notAvailable(4) - link loss, low light, or no loopback
remoteFault(5) - a fault has been detected at the
remote end of the link. This value
applies to 10BASE-FB, 100BASE-T4 Far
End Fault Indication and non-specified
remote faults from a system running
auto-negotiation
invalidSignal(6) - invalid signal has been received from
the other end of the link, 10BASE-FB
only
remoteJabber(7) - remote fault, due to jabber
remoteLinkLoss(8) - remote fault, due to link loss
remoteTest(9) - remote fault, due to test
offline(10) - offline, Clause 37 Auto-Negotiation
only
autoNegError(11) - Auto-Negotiation Error, Clause 37
Auto-Negotiation only
pmdLinkFault(12) - PMA/PMD receive link fault. In case
of PAF (2BASE-TL / 10PASS-TS PHYs),
all PMEs in the aggregation group have
detected a link fault
wisFrameLoss(13) - WIS loss of frame, 10GBASE-W only
wisSignalLoss(14) - WIS loss of signal, 10GBASE-W only
pcsLinkFault(15) - PCS receive link fault
excessiveBER(16) - PCS Bit Error Ratio monitor
reporting excessive error ratio
dxsLinkFault(17) - DTE XGXS receive link fault, XAUI only
pxsLinkFault(18) - PHY XGXS receive link fault, XAUI only
availableReduced(19) - link normal, reduced bandwidth,
2BASE-TL / 10PASS-TS only
ready(20) - at least one PME in the aggregation
group is detecting handshake tones,
2BASE-TL / 10PASS-TS only
If the MAU is a 10M b/s link or fiber type (FOIRL, 10BASE-T,
10BASE-F), then this is equivalent to the link test fail
state/low light function. For an AUI, 10BASE2, 10BASE5, or
10BROAD36 MAU, this indicates whether loopback is detected on
the DI circuit. The value of this attribute persists between
packets for MAU types AUI, 10BASE5, 10BASE2, 10BROAD36, and
10BASEFP.
At power-up or following a reset, the Media Available state
will be unknown(2) for AUI, 10BASE5, 10BASE2, 10BROAD36, and
10BASE-FP MAUs. For these MAUs loopback will be tested on each
transmission during which no collision is detected.
If DI is receiving input when DO returns to IDL after a
transmission and there has been no collision during the
transmission, then loopback will be detected. The Media
Available state will only change during noncollided
transmissions for AUI, 10BASE2, 10BASE5, 10BROAD36, and
10BASE-FP MAUs.
For 100BASE-T2, 100BASE-T4, 100BASE-TX, 100BASE-FX,
100BASE-LX10, and 100BASE-BX10 PHYs the enumerations match the
states within the link integrity state diagram.
Any MAU that implements management of [IEEE802.3] Clause
28 Auto-Negotiation, will map remote fault indication to
remoteFault(5).
Any MAU that implements management of Clause 37
Auto-Negotiation, will map the received RF1 and RF2 bits as
follows: Offline maps to offline(10), Link_Failure maps to
remoteFault(5), and Auto-Negotiation Error maps to
autoNegError(11).
The value remoteFault(5) applies to 10BASE-FB remote
fault indication, the 100BASE-X far-end fault indication, and
nonspecified remote faults from a system running Clause 28
Auto-Negotiation.
The value remoteJabber(7), remoteLink loss(8), or remoteTest(9)
SHOULD be used instead of remoteFault(5) where the reason for
remote fault is identified in the remote signaling protocol.
Where a Clause 22 MII or Clause 35 GMII is present, a logic
one in the remote fault bit maps to the value remoteFault(5),
a logic zero in the link status bit maps to the enumeration
notAvailable(4). The value notAvailable(4) takes precedence
over remoteFault(5).
For 2BASE-TL and 10PASS-TS PHYs, the value unknown(2) maps to
the condition where the PHY (PCS with connected PMEs) is
initializing, the value ready(20) maps to the condition where
the interface is down and at least one PME in the aggregation
group is ready for handshake, the value available(3) maps to
the condition where all the PMEs in the aggregation group are
up, the value notAvailable(4) maps to the condition where all
the PMEs in the aggregation group are down and no handshake
tones are detected, the value availableReduced(19) maps to the
condition where the interface is up, a link fault is detected
at the receive direction by one or more PMEs in the
aggregation group, but at least one PME is up and the
enumeration pmdLinkFault(12) maps to the condition where a link
fault is detected at the receive direction by all of the PMEs
in the aggregation group.
For 10 Gb/s the enumerations map to value of the link_fault
variable within the Link Fault Signaling state diagram
as follows: the value OK maps to the value available(3),
the value Local Fault maps to the value notAvailable(4),
and the value Remote Fault maps to the value remoteFault(5).
The value pmdLinkFault(12), wisFrameLoss(13),
wisSignalLoss(14), pcsLinkFault(15), excessiveBER(16), or
dxsLinkFault(17) SHOULD be used instead of the value
notAvailable(4), where the reason for the Local Fault state can
be identified through the use of the Clause 45 MDIO Interface.
Where multiple reasons for the Local Fault state can be
identified, only the highest precedence error SHOULD be
reported. This precedence in descending order is as follows:
pxsLinkFault
pmdLinkFault
wisFrameLoss
wisSignalLoss
pcsLinkFault
excessiveBER
dxsLinkFault.
Where a Clause 45 MDIO interface is present a logic zero in
the PMA/PMD Receive link status bit ([IEEE802.3]
Section 45.2.1.2.2) maps to the value pmdLinkFault(12),
logic one in the LOF status bit (Section 45.2.2.10.4) maps
to the value wisFrameLoss(13), a logic one in the LOS
status bit (Section 45.2.2.10.5) maps to the value
wisSignalLoss, a logic zero in the PCS Receive
link status bit (Section 45.2.3.2.2) maps to the value
pcsLinkFault(15), a logic one in the 10GBASE-R PCS Latched
high BER status bit (Section 45.2.3.12.2) maps to the value
excessiveBER, a logic zero in the DTE XS receive link status
bit (Section 45.2.5.2.2) maps to the value dxsLinkFault(17)
and a logic zero in the PHY XS transmit link status bit
(Section 45.2.4.2.2) maps to the value pxsLinkFault(18).
The most recent version of this textual convention is available
in the online version of this MIB module on the IANA web site.
Requests for new values should be made to IANA via email
(iana@iana.org)."
REFERENCE
"[IEEE802.3], Section 30.5.1.1.4"
SYNTAX INTEGER {
other(1),
unknown(2),
available(3),
notAvailable(4),
remoteFault(5),
invalidSignal(6),
remoteJabber(7),
remoteLinkLoss(8),
remoteTest(9),
offline(10),
autoNegError(11),
pmdLinkFault(12),
wisFrameLoss(13),
wisSignalLoss(14),
pcsLinkFault(15),
excessiveBER(16),
dxsLinkFault(17),
pxsLinkFault(18),
availableReduced(19),
ready(20)
}
IANAifMauAutoNegCapBits ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This data type is used as the syntax of the
ifMauAutoNegCapabilityBits, ifMauAutoNegCapAdvertisedBits, and
ifMauAutoNegCapReceivedBits objects in the (updated) definition
of MAU-MIB's ifMauAutoNegTable.
The most recent version of this textual convention is available
in the online version of this MIB module on the IANA web site.
Requests for new values should be made to IANA via email
(iana@iana.org)."
REFERENCE
"[IEEE802.3], Section 30.6.1.1.5"
SYNTAX BITS {
bOther(0), -- other or unknown
b10baseT(1), -- 10BASE-T half duplex mode
b10baseTFD(2), -- 10BASE-T full duplex mode
b100baseT4(3), -- 100BASE-T4
b100baseTX(4), -- 100BASE-TX half duplex mode
b100baseTXFD(5), -- 100BASE-TX full duplex mode
b100baseT2(6), -- 100BASE-T2 half duplex mode
b100baseT2FD(7), -- 100BASE-T2 full duplex mode
bFdxPause(8), -- PAUSE for full-duplex links
bFdxAPause(9), -- Asymmetric PAUSE for full-duplex
-- links
bFdxSPause(10), -- Symmetric PAUSE for full-duplex
-- links
bFdxBPause(11), -- Asymmetric and Symmetric PAUSE for
-- full-duplex links
b1000baseX(12), -- 1000BASE-X, -LX, -SX, -CX half
-- duplex mode
b1000baseXFD(13), -- 1000BASE-X, -LX, -SX, -CX full
-- duplex mode
b1000baseT(14), -- 1000BASE-T half duplex mode
b1000baseTFD(15) -- 1000BASE-T full duplex mode
}
IANAifJackType ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Common enumeration values for repeater and interface MAU
jack types. This data type is used as the syntax of the
ifJackType and rpJackType objects in the (updated) definition
of MAU-MIB's ifJackTable and rpJackTable respectively.
Possible values are:
other(1) - undefined or unknown
rj45(2) - RJ45
rj45S(3) - RJ45 shielded
db9(4) - DB9
bnc(5) - BNC
fAUI(6) - AUI female
mAUI(7) - AUI male
fiberSC(8) - SC fiber
fiberMIC(9) - MIC fiber
fiberST(10) - ST fiber
telco(11) - Telco
mtrj(12) - MT-RJ fiber
hssdc(13) - fiber channel style-2
fiberLC(14) - LC fiber
cx4(15) - IB4X for 10GBASE-CX4
The most recent version of this textual convention is available
in the online version of this MIB module on the IANA web site.
Requests for new values should be made to IANA via email
(iana@iana.org)."
SYNTAX INTEGER {
other(1),
rj45(2),
rj45S(3),
db9(4),
bnc(5),
fAUI(6),
mAUI(7),
fiberSC(8),
fiberMIC(9),
fiberST(10),
telco(11),
mtrj(12),
hssdc(13),
fiberLC(14),
-- new since RFC 3636
cx4(15)
}
-- OBJECT IDENTITIES for MAU types
-- (see rpMauType and ifMauType of MAU-MIB for usage)
-- The following definitions has been moved from RFC 3636 and
-- no longer appear in its revision.
dot3MauType OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { mib-2 snmpDot3MauMgt(26) 4 }
dot3MauTypeAUI OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "no internal MAU, view from AUI"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 7"
::= { dot3MauType 1 }
dot3MauType10Base5 OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "thick coax MAU"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 7"
::= { dot3MauType 2 }
dot3MauTypeFoirl OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "FOIRL MAU"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 9.9"
::= { dot3MauType 3 }
dot3MauType10Base2 OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "thin coax MAU"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 10"
::= { dot3MauType 4 }
dot3MauType10BaseT OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "UTP MAU.
Note that it is strongly recommended that
agents return either dot3MauType10BaseTHD or
dot3MauType10BaseTFD if the duplex mode is
known. However, management applications should
be prepared to receive this MAU type value from
older agent implementations."
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 14"
::= { dot3MauType 5 }
dot3MauType10BaseFP OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "passive fiber MAU"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 16"
::= { dot3MauType 6 }
dot3MauType10BaseFB OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "sync fiber MAU"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 17"
::= { dot3MauType 7 }
dot3MauType10BaseFL OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "async fiber MAU.
Note that it is strongly recommended that
agents return either dot3MauType10BaseFLHD or
dot3MauType10BaseFLFD if the duplex mode is
known. However, management applications should
be prepared to receive this MAU type value from
older agent implementations."
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 18"
::= { dot3MauType 8 }
dot3MauType10Broad36 OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "broadband DTE MAU.
Note that 10BROAD36 MAUs can be attached to
interfaces but not to repeaters."
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 11"
::= { dot3MauType 9 }
------ new since RFC 1515:
dot3MauType10BaseTHD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "UTP MAU, half duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 14"
::= { dot3MauType 10 }
dot3MauType10BaseTFD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "UTP MAU, full duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 14"
::= { dot3MauType 11 }
dot3MauType10BaseFLHD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "async fiber MAU, half duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 18"
::= { dot3MauType 12 }
dot3MauType10BaseFLFD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "async fiber MAU, full duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 18"
::= { dot3MauType 13 }
dot3MauType100BaseT4 OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "4 pair category 3 UTP"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 23"
::= { dot3MauType 14 }
dot3MauType100BaseTXHD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "2 pair category 5 UTP, half duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 25"
::= { dot3MauType 15 }
dot3MauType100BaseTXFD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "2 pair category 5 UTP, full duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 25"
::= { dot3MauType 16 }
dot3MauType100BaseFXHD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "X fiber over PMT, half duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 26"
::= { dot3MauType 17 }
dot3MauType100BaseFXFD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "X fiber over PMT, full duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 26"
::= { dot3MauType 18 }
dot3MauType100BaseT2HD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "2 pair category 3 UTP, half duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 32"
::= { dot3MauType 19 }
dot3MauType100BaseT2FD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "2 pair category 3 UTP, full duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 32"
::= { dot3MauType 20 }
------ new since RFC 2239:
dot3MauType1000BaseXHD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "PCS/PMA, unknown PMD, half duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 36"
::= { dot3MauType 21 }
dot3MauType1000BaseXFD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "PCS/PMA, unknown PMD, full duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 36"
::= { dot3MauType 22 }
dot3MauType1000BaseLXHD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Fiber over long-wavelength laser, half duplex
mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 38"
::= { dot3MauType 23 }
dot3MauType1000BaseLXFD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Fiber over long-wavelength laser, full duplex
mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 38"
::= { dot3MauType 24 }
dot3MauType1000BaseSXHD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Fiber over short-wavelength laser, half
duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 38"
::= { dot3MauType 25 }
dot3MauType1000BaseSXFD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Fiber over short-wavelength laser, full
duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 38"
::= { dot3MauType 26 }
dot3MauType1000BaseCXHD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Copper over 150-Ohm balanced cable, half
duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 39"
::= { dot3MauType 27 }
dot3MauType1000BaseCXFD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Copper over 150-Ohm balanced cable, full
duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 39"
::= { dot3MauType 28 }
dot3MauType1000BaseTHD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Four-pair Category 5 UTP, half duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 40"
::= { dot3MauType 29 }
dot3MauType1000BaseTFD OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Four-pair Category 5 UTP, full duplex mode"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 40"
::= { dot3MauType 30 }
------ new since RFC 2668:
dot3MauType10GigBaseX OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "X PCS/PMA, unknown PMD."
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 48"
::= { dot3MauType 31 }
dot3MauType10GigBaseLX4 OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "X fiber over WWDM optics"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 53"
::= { dot3MauType 32 }
dot3MauType10GigBaseR OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "R PCS/PMA, unknown PMD."
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 49"
::= { dot3MauType 33 }
dot3MauType10GigBaseER OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "R fiber over 1550 nm optics"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 52"
::= { dot3MauType 34 }
dot3MauType10GigBaseLR OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "R fiber over 1310 nm optics"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 52"
::= { dot3MauType 35 }
dot3MauType10GigBaseSR OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "R fiber over 850 nm optics"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 52"
::= { dot3MauType 36 }
dot3MauType10GigBaseW OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "W PCS/PMA, unknown PMD."
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 49 and 50"
::= { dot3MauType 37 }
dot3MauType10GigBaseEW OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "W fiber over 1550 nm optics"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 52"
::= { dot3MauType 38 }
dot3MauType10GigBaseLW OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "W fiber over 1310 nm optics"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 52"
::= { dot3MauType 39 }
dot3MauType10GigBaseSW OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "W fiber over 850 nm optics"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 52"
::= { dot3MauType 40 }
------ new since RFC 3636:
dot3MauType10GigBaseCX4 OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "X copper over 8 pair 100-Ohm balanced cable"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 54"
::= { dot3MauType 41 }
dot3MauType2BaseTL OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Voice grade UTP copper, up to 2700m, optional PAF"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Sections 61 and 63"
::= { dot3MauType 42 }
dot3MauType10PassTS OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Voice grade UTP copper, up to 750m, optional PAF"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Sections 61 and 62"
::= { dot3MauType 43 }
dot3MauType100BaseBX10D OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "One single-mode fiber OLT, long wavelength, 10km"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 58"
::= { dot3MauType 44 }
dot3MauType100BaseBX10U OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "One single-mode fiber ONU, long wavelength, 10km"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 58"
::= { dot3MauType 45 }
dot3MauType100BaseLX10 OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Two single-mode fibers, long wavelength, 10km"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 58"
::= { dot3MauType 46 }
dot3MauType1000BaseBX10D OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "One single-mode fiber OLT, long wavelength, 10km"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 59"
::= { dot3MauType 47 }
dot3MauType1000BaseBX10U OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "One single-mode fiber ONU, long wavelength, 10km"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 59"
::= { dot3MauType 48 }
dot3MauType1000BaseLX10 OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "Two sigle-mode fiber, long wavelength, 10km"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 59"
::= { dot3MauType 49 }
dot3MauType1000BasePX10D OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "One single-mode fiber EPON OLT, 10km"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 60"
::= { dot3MauType 50 }
dot3MauType1000BasePX10U OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "One single-mode fiber EPON ONU, 10km"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 60"
::= { dot3MauType 51 }
dot3MauType1000BasePX20D OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "One single-mode fiber EPON OLT, 20km"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 60"
::= { dot3MauType 52 }
dot3MauType1000BasePX20U OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION "One single-mode fiber EPON ONU, 20km"
REFERENCE "[IEEE802.3], Section 60"
::= { dot3MauType 53 }
END
6. Security Considerations
The IANA-MAU-MIB does not define any management objects. Instead, it
defines a set of textual conventions which are used by the MAU-MIB
and may be used by other MIB modules to define management objects.
Meaningful security considerations can only be written for MIB
modules that define management objects.
There are a number of management objects defined in the MAU-MIB that
have a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write. Setting these objects can
have a serious effect on the operation of the network, including:
o enabling or disabling a MAU
o changing a MAU's default type
o enabling, disabling, or restarting autonegotiation
o modifying the capabilities that a MAU advertizes during
autonegotiation.
Such objects may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some
network environments. The support for SET operations in a non-secure
environment without proper protection can have a negative effect on
network operations.
Some of the readable objects in the MAU-MIB module (i.e., objects
with a MAX-ACCESS other than not-accessible) may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. In some
environments, it may be undesirable to allow unauthorized parties to
access statistics or status information about individual links in a
network. It is thus important to control even GET and/or NOTIFY
access to these objects and possibly to even encrypt the values of
these objects when sending them over the network via SNMP.
SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security. Even if the network itself is secure (for example by using IPsec), even then, there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in the MAU-MIB module. It is RECOMMENDED that the implementors consider the security features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework (see [RFC3410], section 8), including full support for the SNMPv3 cryptographic mechanisms (for authentication and privacy). Furthermore, deployment of SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 is NOT RECOMMENDED. Instead, it is RECOMMENDED to deploy SNMPv3 and to enable cryptographic security. It is then a customer/operator responsibility to ensure that the SNMP entity giving access to an instance of the MAU-MIB module is properly configured to give access to the objects only to those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET (change/create/delete) them.7. IANA Considerations
This document defines first version of the IANA-maintained IANA-MAU- MIB module. It is intended that each new MAU type, Media Available state, Auto Negotiation capability, and/or Jack type defined by the IEEE 802.3 working group and approved for publication in a revision of IEEE Std 802.3 will be added to the IANA-maintaned MIB module, provided that it is suitable for being managed by the base objects in the MAU-MIB module. For each new MAU type added, a short description of the MAU technology and, wherever possible, a reference to a publicly available specification SHOULD be specified. An Expert Review, as defined in RFC 2434 [RFC2434], is REQUIRED, for each modification.8. Acknowledgments
This document was produced by the IETF Ethernet Interfaces and Hub MIB Working Group, whose efforts were greatly advanced by the contributions of the following people: Mike Heard John Flick Dan Romascanu This document is based on the Proposed Standard MAU MIB, RFC 3636 [RFC3636], edited by John Flick of Hewlett-Packard, and produced by
the Ethernet Interfaces and Hub MIB Working Group. It extends that document by moving the object identities and textual conventions for MAU types into a IANA-maintained MIB module. In addition, support is provided for the EFM and 10GBASE-CX4 MAUs as defined in [IEEE802.3ah] and [IEEE802.3ak] respectively. RFC 3636, in turn, was based on the Proposed Standard MAU MIB, RFC 2668 [RFC2668], edited by John Flick of Hewlett-Packard and Andrew Smith, then of Extreme Networks, and produced by the Ethernet Interfaces and Hub MIB Working Group. It extends that document by providing support for 10 Gb/s MAUs as defined in [IEEE802.3ae]. RFC 2668, in turn, was based on the Proposed Standard MAU MIB, RFC 2239 [RFC2239], edited by Kathryn de Graaf, then of 3Com, and Dan Romascanu, then of Madge Networks, and produced by the Ethernet Interfaces and Hub MIB Working Group. It extended that document by providing support for 1000 Mb/sec MAUs, PAUSE negotiation and remote fault status as defined in [IEEE802.3]. RFC 2239, in turn, was based on the Proposed Standard MAU MIB, RFC 1515 [RFC1515], edited by Donna McMaster, then of SynOptics Communications, Keith McCloghrie, then of Hughes LAN Systems, and Sam Roberts, then of Farallon Computing, and produced by the Hub MIB Working Group. It extends that document by providing support for 100 Mb/sec MAUs, full duplex MAUs, auto-negotiation, and jack management as defined in [IEEE802.3].9. References
9.1. Normative References
[IEEE802.3] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific requirements - Part 3: Carrier sense multiple access with collision detection (CSMA/CD) access method and physical layer specifications", IEEE Std 802.3-2005, December 2005. [IEEE802.3ae] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific requirements - Part 3: Carrier sense multiple access with collision detection (CSMA/CD) access method and physical layer specifications - Media Access Control (MAC) Parameters, Physical Layer and Management Parameters for 10 Gb/s Operation", IEEE Std 802.3ae-2002, August 2002.
[IEEE802.3ah] IEEE, "Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific requirements - Part 3: Carrier sense multiple access with collision detection (CSMA/CD) access method and physical layer specifications - Media Access Control Parameters, Physical Layers and Management Parameters for Subscriber Access Networks", IEEE Std 802.3ah-2004, September 2004. [IEEE802.3ak] IEEE, "IEEE Standard for Information technology - Telecommunications and information exchange between systems - Local and metropolitan area networks - Specific requirements - Part 3: Carrier sense multiple access with collision detection (CSMA/CD) access method and physical layer specifications - Physical Layer and Management Parameters for 10Gb/s Operation, Type 10GBASE-CX4", IEEE Std 802.3ak-2004, March 2004. [RFC2108] de Graaf, K., Romascanu, D., McMaster, D., and K. McCloghrie, "Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Repeater Devices using SMIv2", RFC 2108, February 1997. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2434] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434, October 1998. [RFC2578] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Structure of Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999. [RFC2579] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J. Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999. [RFC2580] McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., and J. Schoenwaelder, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999. [RFC2863] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "The Interfaces Group MIB", RFC 2863, June 2000.
[RFC3635] Flick, J., "Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet-like Interface Types", RFC 3635, September 2003.9.2. Informative References
[RFC1515] McMaster, D., McCloghrie, K., and S. Roberts, "Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Medium Attachment Units (MAUs)", RFC 1515, September 1993. [RFC2239] de Graaf, K., Romascanu, D., McMaster, D., McCloghrie, K., and S. Roberts, "Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Medium Attachment Units (MAUs) using SMIv2", RFC 2239, November 1997. [RFC2668] Smith, A., Flick, J., de Graaf, K., Romascanu, D., McMaster, D., McCloghrie, K., and S. Roberts, "Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Medium Attachment Units (MAUs)", RFC 2668, August 1999. [RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart, "Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410, December 2002. [RFC3418] Presuhn, R., "Management Information Base (MIB) for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3418, December 2002. [RFC3636] Flick, J., "Definitions of Managed Objects for IEEE 802.3 Medium Attachment Units (MAUs)", RFC 3636, September 2003. [RFC3637] Heard, C., "Definitions of Managed Objects for the Ethernet WAN Interface Sublayer", RFC 3637, September 2003.Author's Address
Edward Beili Actelis Networks Bazel 25 Petach-Tikva Israel Phone: +972-3-924-3491 EMail: edward.beili@actelis.com
Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The IETF Trust (2007). This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors retain all their rights. This document and the information contained herein are provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY, THE IETF TRUST AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Intellectual Property The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be found in BCP 78 and BCP 79. Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at http://www.ietf.org/ipr. The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-ipr@ietf.org. Acknowledgement Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the Internet Society.