RFC 2328
OSPF Version 2
Pages: 244
Internet Standard: 54
→ Errata
Obsoletes: 2178
Updated by: 5709 6549 6845 6860 7474 8042 9355 9454
Internet Standard: 54
→ Errata
Obsoletes: 2178
Updated by: 5709 6549 6845 6860 7474 8042 9355 9454
Part 1 of 8 – Pages 1 to 26
Network Working Group J. Moy Request for Comments: 2328 Ascend Communications, Inc. STD: 54 April 1998 Obsoletes: 2178 Category: Standards Track OSPF Version 2 Status of this Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved. Abstract This memo documents version 2 of the OSPF protocol. OSPF is a link-state routing protocol. It is designed to be run internal to a single Autonomous System. Each OSPF router maintains an identical database describing the Autonomous System's topology. From this database, a routing table is calculated by constructing a shortest- path tree. OSPF recalculates routes quickly in the face of topological changes, utilizing a minimum of routing protocol traffic. OSPF provides support for equal-cost multipath. An area routing capability is provided, enabling an additional level of routing protection and a reduction in routing protocol traffic. In addition, all OSPF routing protocol exchanges are authenticated. The differences between this memo and RFC 2178 are explained in Appendix G. All differences are backward-compatible in nature.
Implementations of this memo and of RFCs 2178, 1583, and 1247 will
interoperate.
Please send comments to ospf@gated.cornell.edu.
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ........................................... 6
1.1 Protocol Overview ...................................... 6
1.2 Definitions of commonly used terms ..................... 8
1.3 Brief history of link-state routing technology ........ 11
1.4 Organization of this document ......................... 12
1.5 Acknowledgments ....................................... 12
2 The link-state database: organization and calculations 13
2.1 Representation of routers and networks ................ 13
2.1.1 Representation of non-broadcast networks .............. 15
2.1.2 An example link-state database ........................ 18
2.2 The shortest-path tree ................................ 21
2.3 Use of external routing information ................... 23
2.4 Equal-cost multipath .................................. 26
3 Splitting the AS into Areas ........................... 26
3.1 The backbone of the Autonomous System ................. 27
3.2 Inter-area routing .................................... 27
3.3 Classification of routers ............................. 28
3.4 A sample area configuration ........................... 29
3.5 IP subnetting support ................................. 35
3.6 Supporting stub areas ................................. 37
3.7 Partitions of areas ................................... 38
4 Functional Summary .................................... 40
4.1 Inter-area routing .................................... 41
4.2 AS external routes .................................... 41
4.3 Routing protocol packets .............................. 42
4.4 Basic implementation requirements ..................... 43
4.5 Optional OSPF capabilities ............................ 46
5 Protocol data structures .............................. 47
6 The Area Data Structure ............................... 49
7 Bringing Up Adjacencies ............................... 52
7.1 The Hello Protocol .................................... 52
7.2 The Synchronization of Databases ...................... 53
7.3 The Designated Router ................................. 54
7.4 The Backup Designated Router .......................... 56
7.5 The graph of adjacencies .............................. 56
8 Protocol Packet Processing ............................ 58
8.1 Sending protocol packets .............................. 58
8.2 Receiving protocol packets ............................ 61
9 The Interface Data Structure .......................... 63
9.1 Interface states ...................................... 67
9.2 Events causing interface state changes ................ 70
9.3 The Interface state machine ........................... 72
9.4 Electing the Designated Router ........................ 75
9.5 Sending Hello packets ................................. 77
9.5.1 Sending Hello packets on NBMA networks ................ 79
10 The Neighbor Data Structure ........................... 80
10.1 Neighbor states ....................................... 83
10.2 Events causing neighbor state changes ................. 87
10.3 The Neighbor state machine ............................ 89
10.4 Whether to become adjacent ............................ 95
10.5 Receiving Hello Packets ............................... 96
10.6 Receiving Database Description Packets ................ 99
10.7 Receiving Link State Request Packets ................. 102
10.8 Sending Database Description Packets ................. 103
10.9 Sending Link State Request Packets ................... 104
10.10 An Example ........................................... 105
11 The Routing Table Structure .......................... 107
11.1 Routing table lookup ................................. 111
11.2 Sample routing table, without areas .................. 111
11.3 Sample routing table, with areas ..................... 112
12 Link State Advertisements (LSAs) ..................... 115
12.1 The LSA Header ....................................... 116
12.1.1 LS age ............................................... 116
12.1.2 Options .............................................. 117
12.1.3 LS type .............................................. 117
12.1.4 Link State ID ........................................ 117
12.1.5 Advertising Router ................................... 119
12.1.6 LS sequence number ................................... 120
12.1.7 LS checksum .......................................... 121
12.2 The link state database .............................. 121
12.3 Representation of TOS ................................ 122
12.4 Originating LSAs ..................................... 123
12.4.1 Router-LSAs .......................................... 126
12.4.1.1 Describing point-to-point interfaces ................. 130
12.4.1.2 Describing broadcast and NBMA interfaces ............. 130
12.4.1.3 Describing virtual links ............................. 131
12.4.1.4 Describing Point-to-MultiPoint interfaces ............ 131
12.4.1.5 Examples of router-LSAs .............................. 132
12.4.2 Network-LSAs ......................................... 133
12.4.2.1 Examples of network-LSAs ............................. 134
12.4.3 Summary-LSAs ......................................... 135
12.4.3.1 Originating summary-LSAs into stub areas ............. 137
12.4.3.2 Examples of summary-LSAs ............................. 138
12.4.4 AS-external-LSAs ..................................... 139
12.4.4.1 Examples of AS-external-LSAs ......................... 140
13 The Flooding Procedure ............................... 143
13.1 Determining which LSA is newer ....................... 146
13.2 Installing LSAs in the database ...................... 147
13.3 Next step in the flooding procedure .................. 148
13.4 Receiving self-originated LSAs ....................... 151
13.5 Sending Link State Acknowledgment packets ............ 152
13.6 Retransmitting LSAs .................................. 154
13.7 Receiving link state acknowledgments ................. 155
14 Aging The Link State Database ........................ 156
14.1 Premature aging of LSAs .............................. 157
15 Virtual Links ........................................ 158
16 Calculation of the routing table ..................... 160
16.1 Calculating the shortest-path tree for an area ....... 161
16.1.1 The next hop calculation ............................. 167
16.2 Calculating the inter-area routes .................... 178
16.3 Examining transit areas' summary-LSAs ................ 170
16.4 Calculating AS external routes ....................... 173
16.4.1 External path preferences ............................ 175
16.5 Incremental updates -- summary-LSAs .................. 175
16.6 Incremental updates -- AS-external-LSAs .............. 177
16.7 Events generated as a result of routing table changes 177
16.8 Equal-cost multipath ................................. 178
Footnotes ............................................ 179
References ........................................... 183
A. OSPF data formats .................................... 185
A.1 Encapsulation of OSPF packets ........................ 185
A.2 The Options field .................................... 187
A.3 OSPF Packet Formats .................................. 189
A.3.1 The OSPF packet header ............................... 190
A.3.2 The Hello packet ..................................... 193
A.3.3 The Database Description packet ...................... 195
A.3.4 The Link State Request packet ........................ 197
A.3.5 The Link State Update packet ......................... 199
A.3.6 The Link State Acknowledgment packet ................. 201
A.4 LSA formats .......................................... 203
A.4.1 The LSA header ....................................... 204
A.4.2 Router-LSAs .......................................... 206
A.4.3 Network-LSAs ......................................... 210
A.4.4 Summary-LSAs ......................................... 212
A.4.5 AS-external-LSAs ..................................... 214
B. Architectural Constants .............................. 217
C. Configurable Constants ............................... 219
C.1 Global parameters .................................... 219
C.2 Area parameters ...................................... 220
C.3 Router interface parameters .......................... 221
C.4 Virtual link parameters .............................. 224
C.5 NBMA network parameters .............................. 224
C.6 Point-to-MultiPoint network parameters ............... 225
C.7 Host route parameters ................................ 226
D. Authentication ....................................... 227
D.1 Null authentication .................................. 227
D.2 Simple password authentication ....................... 228
D.3 Cryptographic authentication ......................... 228
D.4 Message generation ................................... 231
D.4.1 Generating Null authentication ....................... 231
D.4.2 Generating Simple password authentication ............ 232
D.4.3 Generating Cryptographic authentication .............. 232
D.5 Message verification ................................. 234
D.5.1 Verifying Null authentication ........................ 234
D.5.2 Verifying Simple password authentication ............. 234
D.5.3 Verifying Cryptographic authentication ............... 235
E. An algorithm for assigning Link State IDs ............ 236
F. Multiple interfaces to the same network/subnet ....... 239
G. Differences from RFC 2178 ............................ 240
G.1 Flooding modifications ............................... 240
G.2 Changes to external path preferences ................. 241
G.3 Incomplete resolution of virtual next hops ........... 241
G.4 Routing table lookup ................................. 241
Security Considerations .............................. 243
Author's Address ..................................... 243
Full Copyright Statement ............................. 244
1. Introduction This document is a specification of the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) TCP/IP internet routing protocol. OSPF is classified as an Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP). This means that it distributes routing information between routers belonging to a single Autonomous System. The OSPF protocol is based on link-state or SPF technology. This is a departure from the Bellman-Ford base used by traditional TCP/IP internet routing protocols. The OSPF protocol was developed by the OSPF working group of the Internet Engineering Task Force. It has been designed expressly for the TCP/IP internet environment, including explicit support for CIDR and the tagging of externally-derived routing information. OSPF also provides for the authentication of routing updates, and utilizes IP multicast when sending/receiving the updates. In addition, much work has been done to produce a protocol that responds quickly to topology changes, yet involves small amounts of routing protocol traffic. 1.1. Protocol overview OSPF routes IP packets based solely on the destination IP address found in the IP packet header. IP packets are routed "as is" -- they are not encapsulated in any further protocol headers as they transit the Autonomous System. OSPF is a dynamic routing protocol. It quickly detects topological changes in the AS (such as router interface failures) and calculates new loop-free routes after a period of convergence. This period of convergence is short and involves a minimum of routing traffic. In a link-state routing protocol, each router maintains a database describing the Autonomous System's topology. This database is referred to as the link-state database. Each participating router has an identical database. Each individual piece of this database is a particular router's local state (e.g., the router's usable interfaces and reachable neighbors). The router distributes its local state throughout the Autonomous System by flooding.
All routers run the exact same algorithm, in parallel. From the
link-state database, each router constructs a tree of shortest
paths with itself as root. This shortest-path tree gives the
route to each destination in the Autonomous System. Externally
derived routing information appears on the tree as leaves.
When several equal-cost routes to a destination exist, traffic
is distributed equally among them. The cost of a route is
described by a single dimensionless metric.
OSPF allows sets of networks to be grouped together. Such a
grouping is called an area. The topology of an area is hidden
from the rest of the Autonomous System. This information hiding
enables a significant reduction in routing traffic. Also,
routing within the area is determined only by the area's own
topology, lending the area protection from bad routing data. An
area is a generalization of an IP subnetted network.
OSPF enables the flexible configuration of IP subnets. Each
route distributed by OSPF has a destination and mask. Two
different subnets of the same IP network number may have
different sizes (i.e., different masks). This is commonly
referred to as variable length subnetting. A packet is routed
to the best (i.e., longest or most specific) match. Host routes
are considered to be subnets whose masks are "all ones"
(0xffffffff).
All OSPF protocol exchanges are authenticated. This means that
only trusted routers can participate in the Autonomous System's
routing. A variety of authentication schemes can be used; in
fact, separate authentication schemes can be configured for each
IP subnet.
Externally derived routing data (e.g., routes learned from an
Exterior Gateway Protocol such as BGP; see [Ref23]) is
advertised throughout the Autonomous System. This externally
derived data is kept separate from the OSPF protocol's link
state data. Each external route can also be tagged by the
advertising router, enabling the passing of additional
information between routers on the boundary of the Autonomous
System.
1.2. Definitions of commonly used terms This section provides definitions for terms that have a specific meaning to the OSPF protocol and that are used throughout the text. The reader unfamiliar with the Internet Protocol Suite is referred to [Ref13] for an introduction to IP. Router A level three Internet Protocol packet switch. Formerly called a gateway in much of the IP literature. Autonomous System A group of routers exchanging routing information via a common routing protocol. Abbreviated as AS. Interior Gateway Protocol The routing protocol spoken by the routers belonging to an Autonomous system. Abbreviated as IGP. Each Autonomous System has a single IGP. Separate Autonomous Systems may be running different IGPs. Router ID A 32-bit number assigned to each router running the OSPF protocol. This number uniquely identifies the router within an Autonomous System. Network In this memo, an IP network/subnet/supernet. It is possible for one physical network to be assigned multiple IP network/subnet numbers. We consider these to be separate networks. Point-to-point physical networks are an exception - they are considered a single network no matter how many (if any at all) IP network/subnet numbers are assigned to them. Network mask A 32-bit number indicating the range of IP addresses residing on a single IP network/subnet/supernet. This specification displays network masks as hexadecimal numbers.
For example, the network mask for a class C IP network is
displayed as 0xffffff00. Such a mask is often displayed
elsewhere in the literature as 255.255.255.0.
Point-to-point networks
A network that joins a single pair of routers. A 56Kb
serial line is an example of a point-to-point network.
Broadcast networks
Networks supporting many (more than two) attached routers,
together with the capability to address a single physical
message to all of the attached routers (broadcast).
Neighboring routers are discovered dynamically on these nets
using OSPF's Hello Protocol. The Hello Protocol itself
takes advantage of the broadcast capability. The OSPF
protocol makes further use of multicast capabilities, if
they exist. Each pair of routers on a broadcast network is
assumed to be able to communicate directly. An ethernet is
an example of a broadcast network.
Non-broadcast networks
Networks supporting many (more than two) routers, but having
no broadcast capability. Neighboring routers are maintained
on these nets using OSPF's Hello Protocol. However, due to
the lack of broadcast capability, some configuration
information may be necessary to aid in the discovery of
neighbors. On non-broadcast networks, OSPF protocol packets
that are normally multicast need to be sent to each
neighboring router, in turn. An X.25 Public Data Network
(PDN) is an example of a non-broadcast network.
OSPF runs in one of two modes over non-broadcast networks.
The first mode, called non-broadcast multi-access or NBMA,
simulates the operation of OSPF on a broadcast network. The
second mode, called Point-to-MultiPoint, treats the non-
broadcast network as a collection of point-to-point links.
Non-broadcast networks are referred to as NBMA networks or
Point-to-MultiPoint networks, depending on OSPF's mode of
operation over the network.
Interface
The connection between a router and one of its attached
networks. An interface has state information associated
with it, which is obtained from the underlying lower level
protocols and the routing protocol itself. An interface to
a network has associated with it a single IP address and
mask (unless the network is an unnumbered point-to-point
network). An interface is sometimes also referred to as a
link.
Neighboring routers
Two routers that have interfaces to a common network.
Neighbor relationships are maintained by, and usually
dynamically discovered by, OSPF's Hello Protocol.
Adjacency
A relationship formed between selected neighboring routers
for the purpose of exchanging routing information. Not
every pair of neighboring routers become adjacent.
Link state advertisement
Unit of data describing the local state of a router or
network. For a router, this includes the state of the
router's interfaces and adjacencies. Each link state
advertisement is flooded throughout the routing domain. The
collected link state advertisements of all routers and
networks forms the protocol's link state database.
Throughout this memo, link state advertisement is
abbreviated as LSA.
Hello Protocol
The part of the OSPF protocol used to establish and maintain
neighbor relationships. On broadcast networks the Hello
Protocol can also dynamically discover neighboring routers.
Flooding
The part of the OSPF protocol that distributes and
synchronizes the link-state database between OSPF routers.
Designated Router
Each broadcast and NBMA network that has at least two
attached routers has a Designated Router. The Designated
Router generates an LSA for the network and has other
special responsibilities in the running of the protocol.
The Designated Router is elected by the Hello Protocol.
The Designated Router concept enables a reduction in the
number of adjacencies required on a broadcast or NBMA
network. This in turn reduces the amount of routing
protocol traffic and the size of the link-state database.
Lower-level protocols
The underlying network access protocols that provide
services to the Internet Protocol and in turn the OSPF
protocol. Examples of these are the X.25 packet and frame
levels for X.25 PDNs, and the ethernet data link layer for
ethernets.
1.3. Brief history of link-state routing technology
OSPF is a link state routing protocol. Such protocols are also
referred to in the literature as SPF-based or distributed-
database protocols. This section gives a brief description of
the developments in link-state technology that have influenced
the OSPF protocol.
The first link-state routing protocol was developed for use in
the ARPANET packet switching network. This protocol is
described in [Ref3]. It has formed the starting point for all
other link-state protocols. The homogeneous ARPANET
environment, i.e., single-vendor packet switches connected by
synchronous serial lines, simplified the design and
implementation of the original protocol.
Modifications to this protocol were proposed in [Ref4]. These
modifications dealt with increasing the fault tolerance of the
routing protocol through, among other things, adding a checksum
to the LSAs (thereby detecting database corruption). The paper
also included means for reducing the routing traffic overhead in
a link-state protocol. This was accomplished by introducing
mechanisms which enabled the interval between LSA originations
to be increased by an order of magnitude.
A link-state algorithm has also been proposed for use as an ISO
IS-IS routing protocol. This protocol is described in [Ref2].
The protocol includes methods for data and routing traffic
reduction when operating over broadcast networks. This is
accomplished by election of a Designated Router for each
broadcast network, which then originates an LSA for the network.
The OSPF Working Group of the IETF has extended this work in
developing the OSPF protocol. The Designated Router concept has
been greatly enhanced to further reduce the amount of routing
traffic required. Multicast capabilities are utilized for
additional routing bandwidth reduction. An area routing scheme
has been developed enabling information
hiding/protection/reduction. Finally, the algorithms have been
tailored for efficient operation in TCP/IP internets.
1.4. Organization of this document
The first three sections of this specification give a general
overview of the protocol's capabilities and functions. Sections
4-16 explain the protocol's mechanisms in detail. Packet
formats, protocol constants and configuration items are
specified in the appendices.
Labels such as HelloInterval encountered in the text refer to
protocol constants. They may or may not be configurable.
Architectural constants are summarized in Appendix B.
Configurable constants are summarized in Appendix C.
The detailed specification of the protocol is presented in terms
of data structures. This is done in order to make the
explanation more precise. Implementations of the protocol are
required to support the functionality described, but need not
use the precise data structures that appear in this memo.
1.5. Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Ran Atkinson, Fred Baker, Jeffrey
Burgan, Rob Coltun, Dino Farinacci, Vince Fuller, Phanindra
Jujjavarapu, Milo Medin, Tom Pusateri, Kannan Varadhan, Zhaohui
Zhang and the rest of the OSPF Working Group for the ideas and
support they have given to this project.
The OSPF Point-to-MultiPoint interface is based on work done by
Fred Baker.
The OSPF Cryptographic Authentication option was developed by
Fred Baker and Ran Atkinson.
2. The Link-state Database: organization and calculations
The following subsections describe the organization of OSPF's link-
state database, and the routing calculations that are performed on
the database in order to produce a router's routing table.
2.1. Representation of routers and networks
The Autonomous System's link-state database describes a directed
graph. The vertices of the graph consist of routers and
networks. A graph edge connects two routers when they are
attached via a physical point-to-point network. An edge
connecting a router to a network indicates that the router has
an interface on the network. Networks can be either transit or
stub networks. Transit networks are those capable of carrying
data traffic that is neither locally originated nor locally
destined. A transit network is represented by a graph vertex
having both incoming and outgoing edges. A stub network's vertex
has only incoming edges.
The neighborhood of each network node in the graph depends on
the network's type (point-to-point, broadcast, NBMA or Point-
to-MultiPoint) and the number of routers having an interface to
the network. Three cases are depicted in Figure 1a. Rectangles
indicate routers. Circles and oblongs indicate networks.
Router names are prefixed with the letters RT and network names
with the letter N. Router interface names are prefixed by the
letter I. Lines between routers indicate point-to-point
networks. The left side of the figure shows networks with their
connected routers, with the resulting graphs shown on the right.
**FROM** * |RT1|RT2| +---+Ia +---+ * ------------ |RT1|------|RT2| T RT1| | X | +---+ Ib+---+ O RT2| X | | * Ia| | X | * Ib| X | | Physical point-to-point networks **FROM** +---+ * |RT7| * |RT7| N3| +---+ T ------------ | O RT7| | | +----------------------+ * N3| X | | N3 * Stub networks **FROM** +---+ +---+ |RT3| |RT4| |RT3|RT4|RT5|RT6|N2 | +---+ +---+ * ------------------------ | N2 | * RT3| | | | | X | +----------------------+ T RT4| | | | | X | | | O RT5| | | | | X | +---+ +---+ * RT6| | | | | X | |RT5| |RT6| * N2| X | X | X | X | | +---+ +---+ Broadcast or NBMA networks Figure 1a: Network map components
Networks and routers are represented by vertices.
An edge connects Vertex A to Vertex B iff the
intersection of Column A and Row B is marked with
an X.
The top of Figure 1a shows two routers connected by a point-to-
point link. In the resulting link-state database graph, the two
router vertices are directly connected by a pair of edges, one
in each direction. Interfaces to point-to-point networks need
not be assigned IP addresses. When interface addresses are
assigned, they are modelled as stub links, with each router
advertising a stub connection to the other router's interface
address. Optionally, an IP subnet can be assigned to the point-
to-point network. In this case, both routers advertise a stub
link to the IP subnet, instead of advertising each others' IP
interface addresses.
The middle of Figure 1a shows a network with only one attached
router (i.e., a stub network). In this case, the network appears
on the end of a stub connection in the link-state database's
graph.
When multiple routers are attached to a broadcast network, the
link-state database graph shows all routers bidirectionally
connected to the network vertex. This is pictured at the bottom
of Figure 1a.
Each network (stub or transit) in the graph has an IP address
and associated network mask. The mask indicates the number of
nodes on the network. Hosts attached directly to routers
(referred to as host routes) appear on the graph as stub
networks. The network mask for a host route is always
0xffffffff, which indicates the presence of a single node.
2.1.1. Representation of non-broadcast networks
As mentioned previously, OSPF can run over non-broadcast
networks in one of two modes: NBMA or Point-to-MultiPoint.
The choice of mode determines the way that the Hello
protocol and flooding work over the non-broadcast network,
and the way that the network is represented in the link-
state database.
In NBMA mode, OSPF emulates operation over a broadcast
network: a Designated Router is elected for the NBMA
network, and the Designated Router originates an LSA for the
network. The graph representation for broadcast networks and
NBMA networks is identical. This representation is pictured
in the middle of Figure 1a.
NBMA mode is the most efficient way to run OSPF over non-
broadcast networks, both in terms of link-state database
size and in terms of the amount of routing protocol traffic.
However, it has one significant restriction: it requires all
routers attached to the NBMA network to be able to
communicate directly. This restriction may be met on some
non-broadcast networks, such as an ATM subnet utilizing
SVCs. But it is often not met on other non-broadcast
networks, such as PVC-only Frame Relay networks. On non-
broadcast networks where not all routers can communicate
directly you can break the non-broadcast network into
logical subnets, with the routers on each subnet being able
to communicate directly, and then run each separate subnet
as an NBMA network (see [Ref15]). This however requires
quite a bit of administrative overhead, and is prone to
misconfiguration. It is probably better to run such a non-
broadcast network in Point-to-Multipoint mode.
In Point-to-MultiPoint mode, OSPF treats all router-to-
router connections over the non-broadcast network as if they
were point-to-point links. No Designated Router is elected
for the network, nor is there an LSA generated for the
network. In fact, a vertex for the Point-to-MultiPoint
network does not appear in the graph of the link-state
database.
Figure 1b illustrates the link-state database representation
of a Point-to-MultiPoint network. On the left side of the
figure, a Point-to-MultiPoint network is pictured. It is
assumed that all routers can communicate directly, except
for routers RT4 and RT5. I3 though I6 indicate the routers'
IP interface addresses on the Point-to-MultiPoint network.
In the graphical representation of the link-state database,
routers that can communicate directly over the Point-to-
MultiPoint network are joined by bidirectional edges, and
each router also has a stub connection to its own IP
interface address (which is in contrast to the
representation of real point-to-point links; see Figure 1a).
On some non-broadcast networks, use of Point-to-MultiPoint
mode and data-link protocols such as Inverse ARP (see
[Ref14]) will allow autodiscovery of OSPF neighbors even
though broadcast support is not available.
**FROM**
+---+ +---+
|RT3| |RT4| |RT3|RT4|RT5|RT6|
+---+ +---+ * --------------------
I3| N2 |I4 * RT3| | X | X | X |
+----------------------+ T RT4| X | | | X |
I5| |I6 O RT5| X | | | X |
+---+ +---+ * RT6| X | X | X | |
|RT5| |RT6| * I3| X | | | |
+---+ +---+ I4| | X | | |
I5| | | X | |
I6| | | | X |
Figure 1b: Network map components
Point-to-MultiPoint networks
All routers can communicate directly over N2, except
routers RT4 and RT5. I3 through I6 indicate IP
interface addresses
2.1.2. An example link-state database Figure 2 shows a sample map of an Autonomous System. The rectangle labelled H1 indicates a host, which has a SLIP connection to Router RT12. Router RT12 is therefore advertising a host route. Lines between routers indicate physical point-to-point networks. The only point-to-point network that has been assigned interface addresses is the one joining Routers RT6 and RT10. Routers RT5 and RT7 have BGP connections to other Autonomous Systems. A set of BGP- learned routes have been displayed for both of these routers. A cost is associated with the output side of each router interface. This cost is configurable by the system administrator. The lower the cost, the more likely the interface is to be used to forward data traffic. Costs are also associated with the externally derived routing data (e.g., the BGP-learned routes). The directed graph resulting from the map in Figure 2 is depicted in Figure 3. Arcs are labelled with the cost of the corresponding router output interface. Arcs having no labelled cost have a cost of 0. Note that arcs leading from networks to routers always have cost 0; they are significant nonetheless. Note also that the externally derived routing data appears on the graph as stubs. The link-state database is pieced together from LSAs generated by the routers. In the associated graphical representation, the neighborhood of each router or transit network is represented in a single, separate LSA. Figure 4 shows these LSAs graphically. Router RT12 has an interface to two broadcast networks and a SLIP line to a host. Network N6 is a broadcast network with three attached routers. The cost of all links from Network N6 to its attached routers is 0. Note that the LSA for Network N6 is actually generated by one of the network's attached routers: the router that has been elected Designated Router for the network.
+
| 3+---+ N12 N14
N1|--|RT1|\ 1 \ N13 /
| +---+ \ 8\ |8/8
+ \ ____ \|/
/ \ 1+---+8 8+---+6
* N3 *---|RT4|------|RT5|--------+
\____/ +---+ +---+ |
+ / | |7 |
| 3+---+ / | | |
N2|--|RT2|/1 |1 |6 |
| +---+ +---+8 6+---+ |
+ |RT3|--------------|RT6| |
+---+ +---+ |
|2 Ia|7 |
| | |
+---------+ | |
N4 | |
| |
| |
N11 | |
+---------+ | |
| | | N12
|3 | |6 2/
+---+ | +---+/
|RT9| | |RT7|---N15
+---+ | +---+ 9
|1 + | |1
_|__ | Ib|5 __|_
/ \ 1+----+2 | 3+----+1 / \
* N9 *------|RT11|----|---|RT10|---* N6 *
\____/ +----+ | +----+ \____/
| | |
|1 + |1
+--+ 10+----+ N8 +---+
|H1|-----|RT12| |RT8|
+--+SLIP +----+ +---+
|2 |4
| |
+---------+ +--------+
N10 N7
Figure 2: A sample Autonomous System
**FROM**
|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|
|1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10|11|12|N3|N6|N8|N9|
----- ---------------------------------------------
RT1| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | |
RT2| | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | | |
RT3| | | | | |6 | | | | | | |0 | | | |
RT4| | | | |8 | | | | | | | |0 | | | |
RT5| | | |8 | |6 |6 | | | | | | | | | |
RT6| | |8 | |7 | | | | |5 | | | | | | |
RT7| | | | |6 | | | | | | | | |0 | | |
* RT8| | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 | | |
* RT9| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 |
T RT10| | | | | |7 | | | | | | | |0 |0 | |
O RT11| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 |0 |
* RT12| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |0 |
* N1|3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
N2| |3 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
N3|1 |1 |1 |1 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
N4| | |2 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
N6| | | | | | |1 |1 | |1 | | | | | | |
N7| | | | | | | |4 | | | | | | | | |
N8| | | | | | | | | |3 |2 | | | | | |
N9| | | | | | | | |1 | |1 |1 | | | | |
N10| | | | | | | | | | | |2 | | | | |
N11| | | | | | | | |3 | | | | | | | |
N12| | | | |8 | |2 | | | | | | | | | |
N13| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | |
N14| | | | |8 | | | | | | | | | | | |
N15| | | | | | |9 | | | | | | | | | |
H1| | | | | | | | | | | |10| | | | |
Figure 3: The resulting directed graph
Networks and routers are represented by vertices.
An edge of cost X connects Vertex A to Vertex B iff
the intersection of Column A and Row B is marked
with an X.
**FROM** **FROM** |RT12|N9|N10|H1| |RT9|RT11|RT12|N9| * -------------------- * ---------------------- * RT12| | | | | * RT9| | | |0 | T N9|1 | | | | T RT11| | | |0 | O N10|2 | | | | O RT12| | | |0 | * H1|10 | | | | * N9| | | | | * * RT12's router-LSA N9's network-LSA Figure 4: Individual link state components Networks and routers are represented by vertices. An edge of cost X connects Vertex A to Vertex B iff the intersection of Column A and Row B is marked with an X. 2.2. The shortest-path tree When no OSPF areas are configured, each router in the Autonomous System has an identical link-state database, leading to an identical graphical representation. A router generates its routing table from this graph by calculating a tree of shortest paths with the router itself as root. Obviously, the shortest- path tree depends on the router doing the calculation. The shortest-path tree for Router RT6 in our example is depicted in Figure 5. The tree gives the entire path to any destination network or host. However, only the next hop to the destination is used in the forwarding process. Note also that the best route to any router has also been calculated. For the processing of external data, we note the next hop and distance to any router advertising external routes. The resulting routing table for Router RT6 is pictured in Table 2. Note that there is a separate route for each end of a numbered point-to-point network (in this case, the serial line between Routers RT6 and RT10). Routes to networks belonging to other AS'es (such as N12) appear as dashed lines on the shortest path tree in Figure 5. Use of
RT6(origin) RT5 o------------o-----------o Ib /|\ 6 |\ 7 8/8|8\ | \ / | \ 6| \ o | o | \7 N12 o N14 | \ N13 2 | \ N4 o-----o RT3 \ / \ 5 1/ RT10 o-------o Ia / |\ RT4 o-----o N3 3| \1 /| | \ N6 RT7 / | N8 o o---------o / | | | /| RT2 o o RT1 | | 2/ |9 / | | |RT8 / | /3 |3 RT11 o o o o / | | | N12 N15 N2 o o N1 1| |4 | | N9 o o N7 /| / | N11 RT9 / |RT12 o--------o-------o o--------o H1 3 | 10 |2 | o N10 Figure 5: The SPF tree for Router RT6 Edges that are not marked with a cost have a cost of of zero (these are network-to-router links). Routes to networks N12-N15 are external information that is considered in Section 2.3
Destination Next Hop Distance
__________________________________
N1 RT3 10
N2 RT3 10
N3 RT3 7
N4 RT3 8
Ib * 7
Ia RT10 12
N6 RT10 8
N7 RT10 12
N8 RT10 10
N9 RT10 11
N10 RT10 13
N11 RT10 14
H1 RT10 21
__________________________________
RT5 RT5 6
RT7 RT10 8
Table 2: The portion of Router RT6's routing table listing local
destinations.
this externally derived routing information is considered in the
next section.
2.3. Use of external routing information
After the tree is created the external routing information is
examined. This external routing information may originate from
another routing protocol such as BGP, or be statically
configured (static routes). Default routes can also be included
as part of the Autonomous System's external routing information.
External routing information is flooded unaltered throughout the
AS. In our example, all the routers in the Autonomous System
know that Router RT7 has two external routes, with metrics 2 and
9.
OSPF supports two types of external metrics. Type 1 external
metrics are expressed in the same units as OSPF interface cost
(i.e., in terms of the link state metric). Type 2 external
metrics are an order of magnitude larger; any Type 2 metric is
considered greater than the cost of any path internal to the AS.
Use of Type 2 external metrics assumes that routing between
AS'es is the major cost of routing a packet, and eliminates the
need for conversion of external costs to internal link state
metrics.
As an example of Type 1 external metric processing, suppose that
the Routers RT7 and RT5 in Figure 2 are advertising Type 1
external metrics. For each advertised external route, the total
cost from Router RT6 is calculated as the sum of the external
route's advertised cost and the distance from Router RT6 to the
advertising router. When two routers are advertising the same
external destination, RT6 picks the advertising router providing
the minimum total cost. RT6 then sets the next hop to the
external destination equal to the next hop that would be used
when routing packets to the chosen advertising router.
In Figure 2, both Router RT5 and RT7 are advertising an external
route to destination Network N12. Router RT7 is preferred since
it is advertising N12 at a distance of 10 (8+2) to Router RT6,
which is better than Router RT5's 14 (6+8). Table 3 shows the
entries that are added to the routing table when external routes
are examined:
Destination Next Hop Distance
__________________________________
N12 RT10 10
N13 RT5 14
N14 RT5 14
N15 RT10 17
Table 3: The portion of Router RT6's routing table
listing external destinations.
Processing of Type 2 external metrics is simpler. The AS
boundary router advertising the smallest external metric is
chosen, regardless of the internal distance to the AS boundary
router. Suppose in our example both Router RT5 and Router RT7
were advertising Type 2 external routes. Then all traffic
destined for Network N12 would be forwarded to Router RT7, since
2 < 8. When several equal-cost Type 2 routes exist, the
internal distance to the advertising routers is used to break
the tie.
Both Type 1 and Type 2 external metrics can be present in the AS
at the same time. In that event, Type 1 external metrics always
take precedence.
This section has assumed that packets destined for external
destinations are always routed through the advertising AS
boundary router. This is not always desirable. For example,
suppose in Figure 2 there is an additional router attached to
Network N6, called Router RTX. Suppose further that RTX does
not participate in OSPF routing, but does exchange BGP
information with the AS boundary router RT7. Then, Router RT7
would end up advertising OSPF external routes for all
destinations that should be routed to RTX. An extra hop will
sometimes be introduced if packets for these destinations need
always be routed first to Router RT7 (the advertising router).
To deal with this situation, the OSPF protocol allows an AS
boundary router to specify a "forwarding address" in its AS-
external-LSAs. In the above example, Router RT7 would specify
RTX's IP address as the "forwarding address" for all those
destinations whose packets should be routed directly to RTX.
The "forwarding address" has one other application. It enables
routers in the Autonomous System's interior to function as
"route servers". For example, in Figure 2 the router RT6 could
become a route server, gaining external routing information
through a combination of static configuration and external
routing protocols. RT6 would then start advertising itself as
an AS boundary router, and would originate a collection of OSPF
AS-external-LSAs. In each AS-external-LSA, Router RT6 would
specify the correct Autonomous System exit point to use for the
destination through appropriate setting of the LSA's "forwarding
address" field.
2.4. Equal-cost multipath The above discussion has been simplified by considering only a single route to any destination. In reality, if multiple equal-cost routes to a destination exist, they are all discovered and used. This requires no conceptual changes to the algorithm, and its discussion is postponed until we consider the tree-building process in more detail. With equal cost multipath, a router potentially has several available next hops towards any given destination.
(page 26 continued on part 2)