RFC 8907
The Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) Protocol
Pages: ~41
IETF/ops/opsawg/draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-18
Informational
T. Dahm
A. Ota
Google Inc.
D.C. Medway Gash
Cisco Systems, Inc.
D. Carrel
IPsec Research
L. Grant
–
September 2020
The Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) Protocol
Abstract
This document describes the Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) protocol, which is widely deployed today to provide Device Administration for routers, network access servers, and other networked computing devices via one or more centralized servers.
Status of This Memo
This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents approved by the IESG are candidates for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8907 .
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2020 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info ) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
This document may contain material from IETF Documents or IETF Contributions published or made publicly available before November 10, 2008. The person(s) controlling the copyright in some of this material may not have granted the IETF Trust the right to allow modifications of such material outside the IETF Standards Process. Without obtaining an adequate license from the person(s) controlling the copyright in such materials, this document may not be modified outside the IETF Standards Process, and derivative works of it may not be created outside the IETF Standards Process, except to format it for publication as an RFC or to translate it into languages other than English.
Table of Contents
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Conventions
- 3. Technical Definitions
- 4. TACACS+ Packets and Sessions
- 5. Authentication
- 6. Authorization
- 7. Accounting
- 8. Argument-Value Pairs
- 9. Privilege Levels
- 10. Security Considerations
- 11. IANA Considerations
- 12. References
- Acknowledgements
- Authors' Addresses
1. Introduction
This document describes the Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) protocol. It was conceived initially as a general Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting (AAA) protocol. It is widely deployed today but is mainly confined for a specific subset of AAA called Device Administration, which includes authenticating access to network devices, providing central authorization of operations, and auditing of those operations.
A wide range of TACACS+ clients and servers is already deployed in the field. The TACACS+ protocol they are based on is defined in a document that was originally intended for IETF publication, but was never standardized. The document is known as "The Draft" [THE-DRAFT].
This Draft was a product of its time and did not address all of the key security concerns that are considered when designing modern standards. Therefore, deployment must be executed with care. These concerns are addressed in Section 10.
The primary intent of this informational document is to clarify the subset of "The Draft", which is common to implementations supporting Device Administration. It is intended that all implementations that conform to this document will conform to "The Draft". However, it is not intended that all implementations that conform to "The Draft" will conform to this document. The following features from "The Draft" have been removed:
- This document officially removes SENDPASS for security reasons.
- The normative description of legacy features such as the Apple Remote Access Protocol (ARAP) and outbound authentication has been removed.
- The Support for forwarding to an alternative daemon (TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FOLLOW) has been deprecated.
3. Technical Definitions
This section provides a few basic definitions that are applicable to this document.
3.1. Client
The client is any device that initiates TACACS+ protocol requests to mediate access, mainly for the Device Administration use case.
3.2. Server
The server receives TACACS+ protocol requests and replies according to its business model in accordance with the flows defined in this document.
3.3. Packet
All uses of the word packet in this document refer to TACACS+ protocol data units unless explicitly noted otherwise. The informal term "packet" has become an established part of the definition.
3.4. Connection
TACACS+ uses TCP for its transport. TCP Server port 49 is allocated by IANA for TACACS+ traffic.
3.5. Session
The concept of a session is used throughout this document. A TACACS+ session is a single authentication sequence, a single authorization exchange, or a single accounting exchange.
An accounting and authorization session will consist of a single pair of packets (the request and its reply). An authentication session may involve an arbitrary number of packets being exchanged. The session is an operational concept that is maintained between the TACACS+ client and server. It does not necessarily correspond to a given user or user action.
3.6. Treatment of Enumerated Protocol Values
This document describes various enumerated values in the packet header and the headers for specific packet types. For example, in the authentication start packet type, this document defines the action field with three values: TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_LOGIN, TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_CHPASS, and TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SENDAUTH.
If the server does not implement one of the defined options in a packet that it receives, or it encounters an option that is not listed in this document for a header field, then it should respond with an ERROR and terminate the session. This will allow the client to try a different option.
If an error occurs but the type of the incoming packet cannot be determined, a packet with the identical cleartext header but with a sequence number incremented by one and the length set to zero MUST be returned to indicate an error.
3.7. Treatment of Text Strings
The TACACS+ protocol makes extensive use of text strings. "The Draft" intended that these strings would be treated as byte arrays where each byte would represent a US-ASCII character.
More recently, server implementations have been extended to interwork with external identity services, and so a more nuanced approach is needed. Usernames MUST be encoded and handled using the UsernameCasePreserved Profile specified in [RFC 8265]. The security considerations in Section 8 of RFC 8265 apply.
Where specifically mentioned, data fields contain arrays of arbitrary bytes as required for protocol processing. These are not intended to be made visible through user interface to users.
All other text fields in TACACS+ MUST be treated as printable byte arrays of US-ASCII as defined by [RFC 0020]. The term "printable" used here means the fields MUST exclude the "Control Characters" defined in Section 5.2 of RFC 0020.
4. TACACS+ Packets and Sessions
4.1. The TACACS+ Packet Header
All TACACS+ packets begin with the following 12-byte header. The header describes the remainder of the packet:
The following general rules apply to all TACACS+ packet types:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
|major | minor | | | |
|version| version| type | seq_no | flags |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| |
| session_id |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| |
| length |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
- To signal that any variable-length data fields are unused, the corresponding length values are set to zero. Such fields MUST be ignored, and treated as if not present.
- The lengths of data and message fields in a packet are specified by their corresponding length field (and are not null terminated).
- All length values are unsigned and in network byte order.
- This is the major TACACS+ version number.
- TAC_PLUS_MAJOR_VER := 0xc
- This is the minor TACACS+ version number.
- TAC_PLUS_MINOR_VER_DEFAULT := 0x0
- TAC_PLUS_MINOR_VER_ONE := 0x1
- This is the packet type.
- Options are:
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN := 0x01 (Authentication)
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR := 0x02 (Authorization)
- TAC_PLUS_ACCT := 0x03 (Accounting)
- This is the sequence number of the current packet. The first packet in a session MUST have the sequence number 1, and each subsequent packet will increment the sequence number by one. TACACS+ clients only send packets containing odd sequence numbers, and TACACS+ servers only send packets containing even sequence numbers.
- The sequence number must never wrap, i.e., if the sequence number 28-1 is ever reached, that session must terminate and be restarted with a sequence number of 1.
- This field contains various bitmapped flags.
- The flag bit:
- TAC_PLUS_UNENCRYPTED_FLAG := 0x01
- This flag indicates that the sender did not obfuscate the body of the packet. This option MUST NOT be used in production. The application of this flag will be covered in "Security Considerations" (Section 10).
- This flag SHOULD be clear in all deployments. Modern network traffic tools support encrypted traffic when configured with the shared secret (see "Shared Secrets" (Section 10.5.1)), so obfuscated mode can and SHOULD be used even during test.
- The single-connection flag:
- TAC_PLUS_SINGLE_CONNECT_FLAG := 0x04
- This flag is used to allow a client and server to negotiate "Single Connection Mode" (Section 4.3).
- All other bits MUST be ignored when reading, and SHOULD be set to zero when writing.
- The Id for this TACACS+ session. This field does not change for the duration of the TACACS+ session. This number MUST be generated by a cryptographically strong random number generation method. Failure to do so will compromise security of the session. For more details, refer to [RFC 4086].
- The total length of the packet body (not including the header). Implementations MUST allow control over maximum packet sizes accepted by TACACS+ Servers. The recommended maximum packet size is 216.
4.2. The TACACS+ Packet Body
The TACACS+ body types are defined in the packet header. The next sections of this document will address the contents of the different TACACS+ bodies.
4.3. Single Connection Mode
Single Connection Mode is intended to improve performance where there is a lot of traffic between a client and a server by allowing the client to multiplex multiple sessions on a single TCP connection.
The packet header contains the TAC_PLUS_SINGLE_CONNECT_FLAG used by the client and server to negotiate the use of Single Connection Mode.
The client sets this flag to indicate that it supports multiplexing TACACS+ sessions over a single TCP connection. The client MUST NOT send a second packet on a connection until single-connect status has been established.
To indicate it will support Single Connection Mode, the server sets this flag in the first reply packet in response to the first request from a client. The server may set this flag even if the client does not set it, but the client may ignore the flag and close the connection after the session completes.
The flag is only relevant for the first two packets on a connection, to allow the client and server to establish Single Connection Mode. No provision is made for changing Single Connection Mode after the first two packets; the client and server MUST ignore the flag after the second packet on a connection.
If Single Connection Mode has not been established in the first two packets of a TCP connection, then both the client and the server close the connection at the end of the first session.
The client negotiates Single Connection Mode to improve efficiency. The server may refuse to allow Single Connection Mode for the client. For example, it may not be appropriate to allocate a long-lasting TCP connection to a specific client in some deployments. Even if the server is configured to permit Single Connection Mode for a specific client, the server may close the connection. For example, a server MUST be configured to time out a Single Connection Mode TCP connection after a specific period of inactivity to preserve its resources. The client MUST accommodate such closures on a TCP session even after Single Connection Mode has been established.
The TCP connection underlying the Single Connection Mode will close eventually either because of the timeout from the server or from an intermediate link. If a session is in progress when the client detects disconnect, then the client should handle it as described in "Session Completion" (Section 4.4). If a session is not in progress, then the client will need to detect this and restart the Single Connection Mode when it initiates the next session.
4.4. Session Completion
The REPLY packets defined for the packet types in the sections below (Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting) contain a status field. The complete set of options for this field depend upon the packet type, but all three REPLY packet types define values representing PASS, ERROR, and FAIL, which indicate the last packet of a regular session (one that is not aborted).
The server responds with a PASS or a FAIL to indicate that the processing of the request completed and that the client can apply the result (PASS or FAIL) to control the execution of the action that prompted the request to be sent to the server.
The server responds with an ERROR to indicate that the processing of the request did not complete. The client cannot apply the result, and it MUST behave as if the server could not be connected to. For example, the client tries alternative methods, if they are available, such as sending the request to a backup server or using local configuration to determine whether the action that prompted the request should be executed.
Refer to "Aborting an Authentication Session" (Section 5.4.3) for details on handling additional status options.
When the session is complete, the TCP connection should be handled as follows, according to whether Single Connection Mode was negotiated:
- If Single Connection Mode was not negotiated, then the connection should be closed.
- If Single Connection Mode was enabled, then the connection SHOULD be left open (see "Single Connection Mode" (Section 4.3)) but may still be closed after a timeout period to preserve deployment resources.
- If Single Connection Mode was enabled, but an ERROR occurred due to connection issues (such as an incorrect secret (see Section 4.5)), then any further new sessions MUST NOT be accepted on the connection. If there are any sessions that have already been established, then they MAY be completed. Once all active sessions are completed, then the connection MUST be closed.
4.5. Data Obfuscation
The body of packets may be obfuscated. The following sections describe the obfuscation method that is supported in the protocol. In "The Draft", this process was actually referred to as Encryption, but the algorithm would not meet modern standards and so will not be termed as encryption in this document.
The obfuscation mechanism relies on a secret key, a shared secret value that is known to both the client and the server. The secret keys MUST remain secret.
Server implementations MUST allow a unique secret key to be associated with each client. It is a site-dependent decision as to whether or not the use of separate keys is appropriate.
The flag field MUST be configured with TAC_PLUS_UNENCRYPTED_FLAG set to 0 so that the packet body is obfuscated by XORing it bytewise with a pseudo-random pad:
- ENCRYPTED {data} = data pseudo_pad
- data = ENCRYPTED {data} pseudo_pad
- pseudo_pad = {MD5_1 [,MD5_2 [ ... ,MD5_n]]} truncated to len(data)
- MD5_1 = MD5{session_id, key, version, seq_no} MD5_2 = MD5{session_id, key, version, seq_no, MD5_1} .... MD5_n = MD5{session_id, key, version, seq_no, MD5_n-1}
- TAC_PLUS_UNENCRYPTED_FLAG == 0x1
5. Authentication
Authentication is the action of determining who a user (or entity) is. Authentication can take many forms. Traditional authentication employs a name and a fixed password. However, fixed passwords are vulnerable security, so many modern authentication mechanisms utilize "one-time" passwords or a challenge-response query. TACACS+ is designed to support all of these and be flexible enough to handle any future mechanisms. Authentication generally takes place when the user first logs in to a machine or requests a service of it.
Authentication is not mandatory; it is a site-configured option. Some sites do not require it. Others require it only for certain services (see "Authorization" (Section 6)). Authentication may also take place when a user attempts to gain extra privileges and must identify himself or herself as someone who possesses the required information (passwords, etc.) for those privileges.
5.1. The Authentication START Packet Body
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| action | priv_lvl | authen_type | authen_service |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| user_len | port_len | rem_addr_len | data_len |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| user ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| port ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| rem_addr ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| data...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
- This indicates the authentication action. Valid values are:
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_LOGIN := 0x01
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_CHPASS := 0x02
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SENDAUTH := 0x04
- This indicates the privilege level that the user is authenticating as. Please refer to "Privilege Levels" (Section 9).
- The type of authentication. Please see "Common Authentication Flows" (Section 5.4.2).
- Valid values are:
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_ASCII := 0x01
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_PAP := 0x02
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_CHAP := 0x03
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_MSCHAP := 0x05
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_MSCHAPV2 := 0x06
- This is the service that is requesting the authentication.
- Valid values are:
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_NONE := 0x00
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_LOGIN := 0x01
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_ENABLE := 0x02
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_PPP := 0x03
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_PT := 0x05
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_RCMD := 0x06
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_X25 := 0x07
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_NASI := 0x08
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_FWPROXY := 0x09
- The TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_NONE option is intended for the authorization application of this field that indicates that no authentication was performed by the device. The TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_LOGIN option indicates regular login (as opposed to ENABLE) to a client device.
- The TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_ENABLE option identifies the ENABLE authen_service, which refers to a service requesting authentication in order to grant the user different privileges. This is comparable to the Unix "su(1)" command, which substitutes the current user's identity with another. An authen_service value of NONE is only to be used when none of the other authen_service values are appropriate. ENABLE may be requested independently; no requirements for previous authentications or authorizations are imposed by the protocol.
- Other options are included for legacy/backwards compatibility.
- The username is optional in this packet, depending upon the class of authentication. If it is absent, the client MUST set user_len to 0. If included, the user_len indicates the length of the user field, in bytes.
- The name of the client port on which the authentication is taking place. The value of this field is free-format text and is client specific. Examples of this argument include "tty10" to denote the tenth tty line, and "async10" to denote the tenth async interface. The client documentation SHOULD define the values and their meanings for this field. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7). The port_len indicates the length of the port field, in bytes.
- A string indicating the remote location from which the user has connected to the client. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7).
- When TACACS+ was used for dial-up services, this value contained the caller ID.
- When TACACS+ is used for Device Administration, the user is normally connected via a network, and in this case, the value is intended to hold a network address, IPv4 or IPv6. For IPv6 address text representation defined, please see [RFC 5952].
- This field is optional (since the information may not be available). The rem_addr_len indicates the length of the user field, in bytes.
- The data field is used to send data appropriate for the action and authen_type. It is described in more detail in "Common Authentication Flows" (Section 5.4.2). The data_len field indicates the length of the data field, in bytes.
5.2. The Authentication REPLY Packet Body
The TACACS+ server sends only one type of authentication packet (a REPLY packet) to the client.
status
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| status | flags | server_msg_len |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| data_len | server_msg ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| data ...
+----------------+----------------+
- The current status of the authentication.
- Valid values are:
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_PASS := 0x01
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FAIL := 0x02
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_GETDATA := 0x03
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_GETUSER := 0x04
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_GETPASS := 0x05
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_RESTART := 0x06
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_ERROR := 0x07
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FOLLOW := 0x21
- Bitmapped flags that modify the action to be taken.
- The following values are defined:
- TAC_PLUS_REPLY_FLAG_NOECHO := 0x01
- A message to be displayed to the user. This field is optional. The server_msg_len indicates the length of the server_msg field, in bytes. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7).
- A field that holds data that is a part of the authentication exchange and is intended for client processing, not the user. It is not a printable text encoding. Examples of its use are shown in "Common Authentication Flows" (Section 5.4.2). The data_len indicates the length of the data field, in bytes.
5.3. The Authentication CONTINUE Packet Body
This packet is sent from the client to the server following the receipt of a REPLY packet.
user_msg, user_msg_len
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| user_msg len | data_len |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| flags | user_msg ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| data ...
+----------------+
- A field that is the string that the user entered, or the client provided on behalf of the user, in response to the server_msg from a REPLY packet. The user_len indicates the length of the user field, in bytes.
- This field carries information that is specific to the action and the authen_type for this session. Valid uses of this field are described below. It is not a printable text encoding. The data_len indicates the length of the data field, in bytes.
- This holds the bitmapped flags that modify the action to be taken.
- The following values are defined:
- TAC_PLUS_CONTINUE_FLAG_ABORT := 0x01
5.4. Description of Authentication Process
The action, authen_type, and authen_service fields (described above) combine to indicate what kind of authentication is to be performed. Every authentication START, REPLY, and CONTINUE packet includes a data field. The use of this field is dependent upon the kind of authentication.
This document defines a core set of authentication flows to be supported by TACACS+. Each authentication flow consists of a START packet. The server responds either with a request for more information (GETDATA, GETUSER, or GETPASS) or a termination PASS, FAIL, ERROR, or RESTART. The actions and meanings when the server sends a RESTART or ERROR are common and are described further below.
When the REPLY status equals TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_GETDATA, TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_GETUSER, or TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_GETPASS, authentication continues and the server SHOULD provide server_msg content for the client to prompt the user for more information. The client MUST then return a CONTINUE packet containing the requested information in the user_msg field.
The client should interpret TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_GETUSER as a request for a username and TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_GETPASS as a request for a password. The TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_GETDATA is the generic request for more information to flexibly support future requirements.
If the information being requested by the server from the client is sensitive, then the server should set the TAC_PLUS_REPLY_FLAG_NOECHO flag. When the client queries the user for the information, the response MUST NOT be reflected in the user interface as it is entered.
The data field is only used in the REPLY where explicitly defined below.
5.4.1. Version Behavior
The TACACS+ protocol is versioned to allow revisions while maintaining backwards compatibility. The version number is in every packet header. The changes between minor_version 0 and 1 apply only to the authentication process, and all deal with the way that Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP) and Password Authentication Protocol (PAP) authentications are handled. minor_version 1 may only be used for authentication kinds that explicitly call for it in the table below:
Table 1: TACACS+ Protocol Versioning
The '-' symbol represents that the option is not valid.
All authorization and accounting and ASCII authentication use minor_version 0.
PAP, CHAP, and MS-CHAP login use minor_version 1. The normal exchange is a single START packet from the client and a single REPLY from the server.
The removal of SENDPASS was prompted by security concerns and is no longer considered part of the TACACS+ protocol.
| LOGIN | CHPASS | SENDAUTH | |
| ASCII | v0 | v0 | - |
| PAP | v1 | - | v1 |
| CHAP | v1 | - | v1 |
| MS-CHAPv1/2 | v1 | - | v1 |
5.4.2. Common Authentication Flows
This section describes common authentication flows. If the server does not implement an option, it MUST respond with TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FAIL.
5.4.2.1. ASCII Login
action = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_LOGIN
authen_type = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_ASCII
minor_version = 0x0
5.4.2.2. PAP Login
action = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_LOGIN
authen_type = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_PAP
minor_version = 0x1
5.4.2.3. CHAP Login
action = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_LOGIN
authen_type = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_CHAP
minor_version = 0x1
5.4.2.4. MS-CHAP v1 Login
action = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_LOGIN
authen_type = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_MSCHAP
minor_version = 0x1
5.4.2.5. MS-CHAP v2 Login
action = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_LOGIN
authen_type = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_MSCHAPV2
minor_version = 0x1
5.4.2.6. Enable Requests
action = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_LOGIN
priv_lvl = implementation dependent
authen_type = not used
service = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SVC_ENABLE
5.4.2.7. ASCII Change Password Request
action = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_CHPASS authen_type = TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_ASCII
5.4.3. Aborting an Authentication Session
The client may prematurely terminate a session by setting the TAC_PLUS_CONTINUE_FLAG_ABORT flag in the CONTINUE message. If this flag is set, the data portion of the message may contain a text explaining the reason for the abort. This text will be handled by the server according to the requirements of the deployment. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7). For more details about session termination, refer to "Session Completion" (Section 4.4).
In cases of PASS, FAIL, or ERROR, the server can insert a message into server_msg to be displayed to the user.
"The Draft" [THE-DRAFT] defined a mechanism to direct authentication requests to an alternative server. This mechanism is regarded as insecure, is deprecated, and is not covered here. The client should treat TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FOLLOW as TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FAIL.
If the status equals TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_ERROR, then the host is indicating that it is experiencing an unrecoverable error and the authentication will proceed as if that host could not be contacted. The data field may contain a message to be printed on an administrative console or log.
If the status equals TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_RESTART, then the authentication sequence is restarted with a new START packet from the client, with a new session Id and seq_no set to 1. This REPLY packet indicates that the current authen_type value (as specified in the START packet) is not acceptable for this session. The client may try an alternative authen_type.
If a client does not implement the TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_RESTART option, then it MUST process the response as if the status was TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FAIL.
6. Authorization
In the TACACS+ protocol, authorization is the action of determining what a user is allowed to do. Generally, authentication precedes authorization, though it is not mandatory that a client use the same service for authentication that it will use for authorization. An authorization request may indicate that the user is not authenticated (we don't know who they are). In this case, it is up to the server to determine, according to its configuration, if an unauthenticated user is allowed the services in question.
Authorization does not merely provide yes or no answers, but it may also customize the service for the particular user. A common use of authorization is to provision a shell session when a user first logs into a device to administer it. The TACACS+ server might respond to the request by allowing the service, but placing a time restriction on the login shell. For a list of common arguments used in authorization, see "Authorization Arguments" (Section 8.2).
In the TACACS+ protocol, an authorization is always a single pair of messages: a REQUEST from the client followed by a REPLY from the server.
The authorization REQUEST message contains a fixed set of fields that indicate how the user was authenticated and a variable set of arguments that describe the services and options for which authorization is requested.
The REPLY contains a variable set of response arguments (argument-value pairs) that can restrict or modify the client's actions.
6.1. The Authorization REQUEST Packet Body
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| authen_method | priv_lvl | authen_type | authen_service |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| user_len | port_len | rem_addr_len | arg_cnt |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| arg_1_len | arg_2_len | ... | arg_N_len |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| user ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| port ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| rem_addr ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| arg_1 ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| arg_2 ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| arg_N ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
- This field allows the client to indicate the authentication method used to acquire user information.
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_NOT_SET := 0x00
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_NONE := 0x01
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_KRB5 := 0x02
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_LINE := 0x03
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_ENABLE := 0x04
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_LOCAL := 0x05
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_TACACSPLUS := 0x06
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_GUEST := 0x08
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_RADIUS := 0x10
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_KRB4 := 0x11
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_RCMD := 0x20
- As this information is not always subject to verification, it MUST NOT be used in policy evaluation. LINE refers to a fixed password associated with the terminal line used to gain access. LOCAL is a client local user database. ENABLE is a command that authenticates in order to grant new privileges. TACACSPLUS is, of course, TACACS+. GUEST is an unqualified guest authentication. RADIUS is the RADIUS authentication protocol. RCMD refers to authentication provided via the R-command protocols from Berkeley Unix. KRB5 [RFC 4120] and KRB4 [KRB4] are Kerberos versions 5 and 4.
- As mentioned above, this field is used by the client to indicate how it performed the authentication. One of the options (TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_TACACSPLUS := 0x06) is TACACS+ itself, and so the detail of how the client performed this option is given in "Authentication" (Section 5). For all other options, such as KRB and RADIUS, the TACACS+ protocol did not play any part in the authentication phase; as those interactions were not conducted using the TACACS+ protocol, they will not be documented here. For implementers of clients who need details of the other protocols, please refer to the respective Kerberos [RFC 4120] and RADIUS [RFC 3579] RFCs.
- This field is used in the same way as the priv_lvl field in authentication request and is described in "Privilege Levels" (Section 9). It indicates the user's current privilege level.
- This field corresponds to the authen_type field in "Authentication" (Section 5). It indicates the type of authentication that was performed. If this information is not available, then the client will set authen_type to TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_NOT_SET := 0x00. This value is valid only in authorization and accounting requests.
- This field is the same as the authen_service field in "Authentication" (Section 5). It indicates the service through which the user authenticated.
- This field contains the user's account name. The user_len MUST indicate the length of the user field, in bytes.
- This field matches the port field in "Authentication" (Section 5). The port_len indicates the length of the port field, in bytes.
- This field matches the rem_addr field in "Authentication" (Section 5). The rem_addr_len indicates the length of the port field, in bytes.
- This represents the number of authorization arguments to follow.
- These arguments are the primary elements of the authorization interaction. In the request packet, they describe the specifics of the authorization that is being requested. Each argument is encoded in the packet as a single arg field (arg_1... arg_N) with a corresponding length field (which indicates the length of each argument in bytes).
- The authorization arguments in both the REQUEST and the REPLY are argument-value pairs. The argument and the value are in a single string and are separated by either a "=" (0X3D) or a "*" (0X2A). The equals sign indicates a mandatory argument. The asterisk indicates an optional one. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7).
- An argument name MUST NOT contain either of the separators. An argument value MAY contain the separators. This means that the arguments must be parsed until the first separator is encountered; all characters in the argument, after this separator, are interpreted as the argument value.
- Optional arguments are ones that may be disregarded by either client or server. Mandatory arguments require that the receiving side can handle the argument, that is, its implementation and configuration includes the details of how to act on it. If the client receives a mandatory argument that it cannot handle, it MUST consider the authorization to have failed. The value part of an argument-value pair may be empty, that is, the length of the value may be zero.
- Argument-value strings are not NULL terminated; rather, their length value indicates their end. The maximum length of an argument-value string is 255 characters. The minimum is two characters (one name-value character and the separator).
- Though the arguments allow extensibility, a common core set of authorization arguments SHOULD be supported by clients and servers; these are listed in "Authorization Arguments" (Section 8.2).
6.2. The Authorization REPLY Packet Body
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| status | arg_cnt | server_msg len |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
+ data_len | arg_1_len | arg_2_len |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| ... | arg_N_len | server_msg ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| data ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| arg_1 ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| arg_2 ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| arg_N ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
- This field indicates the authorization status.
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_PASS_ADD := 0x01 If the status equals TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_PASS_ADD, then the arguments specified in the request are authorized and the arguments in the response MUST be applied according to the rules described above. To approve the authorization with no modifications, the server sets the status to TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_PASS_ADD and the arg_cnt to 0.
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_PASS_REPL := 0x02 If the status equals TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_PASS_REPL, then the client MUST use the authorization argument-value pairs (if any) in the response instead of the authorization argument-value pairs from the request.
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_FAIL := 0x10 If the status equals TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_FAIL, then the requested authorization MUST be denied.
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_ERROR := 0x11 A status of TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_ERROR indicates an error occurred on the server. For the differences between ERROR and FAIL, refer to "Session Completion" (Section 4.4). None of the arg values have any relevance if an ERROR is set and must be ignored.
- TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_FOLLOW := 0x21 When the status equals TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_FOLLOW, the arg_cnt MUST be 0. In that case, the actions to be taken and the contents of the data field are identical to the TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FOLLOW status for authentication.
- This is a string that may be presented to the user. The server_msg_len indicates the length of the server_msg field, in bytes. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7).
- This is a string that may be presented on an administrative display, console, or log. The decision to present this message is client specific. The data_len indicates the length of the data field, in bytes. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7).
- This represents the number of authorization arguments to follow.
- The arguments describe the specifics of the authorization that is being requested. For details of the content of the args, refer to "Authorization Arguments" (Section 8.2). Each argument is encoded in the packet as a single arg field (arg_1... arg_N) with a corresponding length field (which indicates the length of each argument in bytes).
7. Accounting
Accounting is typically the third action after authentication and authorization. But again, neither authentication nor authorization is required. Accounting is the action of recording what a user is doing and/or has done. Accounting in TACACS+ can serve two purposes: it may be used as an auditing tool for security services, and it may also be used to account for services used such as in a billing environment. To this end, TACACS+ supports three types of accounting records: Start records indicate that a service is about to begin, Stop records indicate that a service has just terminated, and Update records are intermediate notices that indicate that a service is still being performed. TACACS+ accounting records contain all the information used in the authorization records and also contain accounting-specific information such as start and stop times (when appropriate) and resource usage information. A list of accounting arguments is defined in "Accounting Arguments" (Section 8.3).
7.1. The Account REQUEST Packet Body
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| flags | authen_method | priv_lvl | authen_type |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| authen_service | user_len | port_len | rem_addr_len |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| arg_cnt | arg_1_len | arg_2_len | ... |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| arg_N_len | user ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| port ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| rem_addr ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| arg_1 ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| arg_2 ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| arg_N ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
- This holds bitmapped flags.
- Valid values are:
- TAC_PLUS_ACCT_FLAG_START := 0x02
- TAC_PLUS_ACCT_FLAG_STOP := 0x04
- TAC_PLUS_ACCT_FLAG_WATCHDOG := 0x08
7.2. The Accounting REPLY Packet Body
The purpose of accounting is to record the action that has occurred on the client. The server MUST reply with success only when the accounting request has been recorded. If the server did not record the accounting request, then it MUST reply with ERROR.
status
Table 2: Summary of Accounting Packets
The START and STOP flags are mutually exclusive.
The WATCHDOG flag is used by the client to communicate ongoing status of a long-running task. Update records are sent at the client's discretion. The frequency of the update depends upon the intended application: a watchdog to provide progress indication will require higher frequency than a daily keep-alive. When the WATCHDOG flag is set along with the START flag, it indicates that the update record provides additional or updated arguments from the original START record. If the START flag is not set, then this indicates only that task is still running, and no new information is provided (servers MUST ignore any arguments). The STOP flag MUST NOT be set in conjunction with the WATCHDOG flag.
The server MUST respond with TAC_PLUS_ACCT_STATUS_ERROR if the client requests an INVALID option.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| server_msg len | data_len |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| status | server_msg ...
+----------------+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| data ...
+----------------+
- This is the return status.
- Values are:
- TAC_PLUS_ACCT_STATUS_SUCCESS := 0x01
- TAC_PLUS_ACCT_STATUS_ERROR := 0x02
- TAC_PLUS_ACCT_STATUS_FOLLOW := 0x21 When the status equals TAC_PLUS_ACCT_STATUS_FOLLOW, the actions to be taken and the contents of the data field are identical to the TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FOLLOW status for authentication.
- This is a string that may be presented to the user. The server_msg_len indicates the length of the server_msg field, in bytes. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7).
- This is a string that may be presented on an administrative display, console, or log. The decision to present this message is client specific. The data_len indicates the length of the data field, in bytes. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7).
| Watchdog | Stop | Start | Flags & 0xE | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | INVALID |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | Start Accounting Record |
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | Stop Accounting Record |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | INVALID |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | Watchdog, no update |
| 1 | 0 | 1 | A | Watchdog, with update |
| 1 | 1 | 0 | C | INVALID |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | E | INVALID |
8. Argument-Value Pairs
TACACS+ is intended to be an extensible protocol. The arguments used in Authorization and Accounting are not limited by this document. Some arguments are defined below for common use cases. Clients MUST use these arguments when supporting the corresponding use cases.
8.1. Value Encoding
All argument values are encoded as strings. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7). The following type representations SHOULD be followed.
Numeric
- All numeric values in an argument-value string are provided as decimal numbers, unless otherwise stated. All arguments include a length field, and TACACS+ implementations MUST verify that they can accommodate the lengths of numeric arguments before attempting to process them. If the length cannot be accommodated, then the argument MUST be regarded as not handled and the logic in "Authorization" (Section 6.1) regarding the processing of arguments MUST be applied.
- All Boolean arguments are encoded with values "true" or "false".
- It is recommended that hosts be specified as an IP address so as to avoid any ambiguities. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7). IPv4 addresses are specified as octet numerics separated by dots ('.'). IPv6 address text representation is defined in [RFC 5952].
- Absolute date/times are specified in seconds since the epoch, 12:00am, January 1, 1970. The time zone MUST be UTC unless a time zone argument is specified.
- Many values have no specific type representation and are interpreted as plain strings.
- Arguments may be submitted with no value, in which case they consist of the name and the mandatory or optional separator. For example, the argument "cmd", which has no value, is transmitted as a string of four characters "cmd=".
8.2. Authorization Arguments
service (String)
- The primary service. Specifying a service argument indicates that this is a request for authorization or accounting of that service. For example: "shell", "tty-server", "connection", "system" and "firewall"; others may be chosen for the required application. This argument MUST always be included.
- A field that may be used to indicate a subset of a service.
- A shell (exec) command. This indicates the command name of the command that is to be run. The "cmd" argument MUST be specified if service equals "shell".
- Authorization of shell commands is a common use case for the TACACS+ protocol. Command Authorization generally takes one of two forms: session based or command based.
- For session-based shell authorization, the "cmd" argument will have an empty value. The client determines which commands are allowed in a session according to the arguments present in the authorization.
- In command-based authorization, the client requests that the server determine whether a command is allowed by making an authorization request for each command. The "cmd" argument will have the command name as its value.
- An argument to a shell (exec) command. This indicates an argument for the shell command that is to be run. Multiple cmd-arg arguments may be specified, and they are order dependent.
- A number representing a connection access list. Applicable only to session-based shell authorization. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7).
- The identifier (name) of an interface input access list. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7).
- The identifier (name) of an interface output access list. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7).
- A network address.
- The identifier of an address pool from which the client can assign an address.
- An absolute timer for the connection (in minutes). A value of zero indicates no timeout.
- An idle-timeout for the connection (in minutes). A value of zero indicates no timeout.
- An auto-command to run. Applicable only to session-based shell authorization.
- Prevents the user from using an escape character. Applicable only to session-based shell authorization.
- Boolean. Do not disconnect after an automatic command. Applicable only to session-based shell authorization.
- The privilege level to be assigned. Please refer to "Privilege Levels" (Section 9).
8.3. Accounting Arguments
The following arguments are defined for TACACS+ accounting only. They MUST precede any argument-value pairs that are defined in "Authorization" (Section 6).
task_id (String)
- Start and stop records for the same event MUST have matching task_id argument values. The client MUST ensure that active task_ids are not duplicated; a client MUST NOT reuse a task_id in a start record until it has sent a stop record for that task_id. Servers MUST NOT make assumptions about the format of a task_id.
- The time the action started (in seconds since the epoch).
- The time the action stopped (in seconds since the epoch).
- The elapsed time in seconds for the action.
- The time zone abbreviation for all timestamps included in this packet. A database of time zones is maintained in [TZDB].
- Used only when "service=system". Current values are "net_acct", "cmd_acct", "conn_acct", "shell_acct", "sys_acct", and "clock_change". These indicate system-level changes. The flags field SHOULD indicate whether the service started or stopped.
- Accompanies an event argument. It describes why the event occurred.
- The number of bytes transferred by this action.
- The number of bytes transferred by this action from the endstation to the client port.
- The number of bytes transferred by this action from the client to the endstation port.
- The number of packets transferred by this action.
- The number of input packets transferred by this action from the endstation to the client port.
- The number of output packets transferred by this action from the client port to the endstation.
- A string describing the status of the action. For details of text encoding, see "Treatment of Text Strings" (Section 3.7).
9. Privilege Levels
The TACACS+ protocol supports flexible authorization schemes through the extensible arguments.
The privilege levels scheme is built into the protocol and has been extensively used as an option for Session-based shell authorization. Privilege levels are ordered values from 0 to 15 with each level being a superset of the next lower value. Configuration and implementation of the client will map actions (such as the permission to execute specific commands) to different privilege levels. The allocation of commands to privilege levels is highly dependent upon the deployment. Common allocations are as follows:
- TAC_PLUS_PRIV_LVL_MIN := 0x00. The level normally allocated to an unauthenticated session.
- TAC_PLUS_PRIV_LVL_USER := 0x01. The level normally allocated to a regular authenticated session.
- TAC_PLUS_PRIV_LVL_ROOT := 0x0f. The level normally allocated to a session authenticated by a highly privileged user to allow commands with significant system impact.
- TAC_PLUS_PRIV_LVL_MAX := 0x0f. The highest privilege level.
10. Security Considerations
"The Draft" [THE-DRAFT] from 1998 did not address all of the key security concerns that are considered when designing modern standards. This section addresses known limitations and concerns that will impact overall security of the protocol and systems where this protocol is deployed to manage central authentication, authorization, or accounting for network Device Administration.
Multiple implementations of the protocol described in "The Draft" [THE-DRAFT] have been deployed. As the protocol was never standardized, current implementations may be incompatible in non-obvious ways, giving rise to additional security risks. This section does not claim to enumerate all possible security vulnerabilities.
10.1. General Security of the Protocol
The TACACS+ protocol does not include a security mechanism that would meet modern-day requirements. These security mechanisms would be best referred to as "obfuscation" and not "encryption", since they provide no meaningful integrity, privacy, or replay protection. An attacker with access to the data stream should be assumed to be able to read and modify all TACACS+ packets. Without mitigation, a range of risks such as the following are possible:
- Accounting information may be modified by the man-in-the-middle attacker, making such logs unsuitable and not trustable for auditing purposes.
- Invalid or misleading values may be inserted by the man-in-the-middle attacker in various fields at known offsets to try and circumvent the authentication or authorization checks even inside the obfuscated body.
- Brute-force attacks exploiting increased efficiency of MD5 digest computation.
- Known plaintext attacks that may decrease the cost of brute-force attacks.
- Chosen plaintext attacks that may decrease the cost of a brute-force attacks.
- No forward secrecy.
10.2. Security of Authentication Sessions
Authentication sessions SHOULD be used via a secure transport (see "TACACS+ Best Practices" (Section 10.5)) as the man-in-the-middle attack may completely subvert them. Even CHAP, which may be considered resistant to password interception, is unsafe as it does not protect the username from a trivial man-in-the-middle attack.
This document deprecates the redirection mechanism using the TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FOLLOW option, which was included in "The Draft". As part of this process, the secret key for a new server was sent to the client. This public exchange of secret keys means that once one session is broken, it may be possible to leverage that key to attacking connections to other servers. This mechanism MUST NOT be used in modern deployments. It MUST NOT be used outside a secured deployment.
10.3. Security of Authorization Sessions
Authorization sessions SHOULD be used via a secure transport (see "TACACS+ Best Practices" (Section 10.5)) as it's trivial to execute a successful man-in-the-middle attack that changes well-known plaintext in either requests or responses.
As an example, take the field "authen_method". It's not unusual in actual deployments to authorize all commands received via the device local serial port (a console port), as that one is usually considered secure by virtue of the device located in a physically secure location. If an administrator would configure the authorization system to allow all commands entered by the user on a local console to aid in troubleshooting, that would give all access to all commands to any attacker that would be able to change the "authen_method" from TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_TACACSPLUS to TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_METH_LINE. In this regard, the obfuscation provided by the protocol itself wouldn't help much, because:
- A lack of integrity means that any byte in the payload may be changed without either side detecting the change.
- Known plaintext means that an attacker would know with certainty which octet is the target of the attack (in this case, first octet after the header).
- In combination with known plaintext, the attacker can determine with certainty the value of the crypto-pad octet used to obfuscate the original octet.
10.4. Security of Accounting Sessions
Accounting sessions SHOULD be used via a secure transport (see "TACACS+ Best Practices" (Section 10.5)). Although Accounting sessions are not directly involved in authentication or authorizing operations on the device, man-in-the-middle attackers may do any of the following:
- Replace accounting data with new valid values or garbage that can confuse auditors or hide information related to their authentication and/or authorization attack attempts.
- Try and poison an accounting log with entries designed to make systems behave in unintended ways (these systems could be TACACS+ servers and any other systems that would manage accounting entries).
10.5. TACACS+ Best Practices
With respect to the observations about the security issues described above, a network administrator MUST NOT rely on the obfuscation of the TACACS+ protocol. TACACS+ MUST be used within a secure deployment; TACACS+ MUST be deployed over networks that ensure privacy and integrity of the communication and MUST be deployed over a network that is separated from other traffic. Failure to do so will impact overall network security.
The following recommendations impose restrictions on how the protocol is applied. These restrictions were not imposed in "The Draft". New implementations, and upgrades of current implementations, MUST implement these recommendations. Vendors SHOULD provide mechanisms to assist the administrator to achieve these best practices.
10.5.1. Shared Secrets
TACACS+ servers and clients MUST treat shared secrets as sensitive data to be managed securely, as would be expected for other sensitive data such as identity credential information. TACACS+ servers MUST NOT leak sensitive data.
For example:
- TACACS+ servers MUST NOT expose shared secrets in logs.
- TACACS+ servers MUST allow a dedicated secret key to be defined for each client.
- TACACS+ server management systems MUST provide a mechanism to track secret key lifetimes and notify administrators to update them periodically. TACACS+ server administrators SHOULD change secret keys at regular intervals.
- TACACS+ servers SHOULD warn administrators if secret keys are not unique per client.
- TACACS+ server administrators SHOULD always define a secret for each client.
- TACACS+ servers and clients MUST support shared keys that are at least 32 characters long.
- TACACS+ servers MUST support policy to define minimum complexity for shared keys.
- TACACS+ clients SHOULD NOT allow servers to be configured without a shared secret key or shared key that is less than 16 characters long.
- TACACS+ server administrators SHOULD configure secret keys of a minimum of 16 characters in length.
10.5.2. Connections and Obfuscation
TACACS+ servers MUST allow the definition of individual clients. The servers MUST only accept network connection attempts from these defined known clients.
TACACS+ servers MUST reject connections that have TAC_PLUS_UNENCRYPTED_FLAG set. There MUST always be a shared secret set on the server for the client requesting the connection.
If an invalid shared secret is detected when processing packets for a client, TACACS+ servers MUST NOT accept any new sessions on that connection. TACACS+ servers MUST terminate the connection on completion of any sessions that were previously established with a valid shared secret on that connection.
TACACS+ clients MUST NOT set TAC_PLUS_UNENCRYPTED_FLAG. Clients MUST be implemented in a way that requires explicit configuration to enable the use of TAC_PLUS_UNENCRYPTED_FLAG. This option MUST NOT be used when the client is in production.
When a TACACS+ client receives responses from servers where:
- the response packet was received from the server configured with a shared key, but the packet has TAC_PLUS_UNENCRYPTED_FLAG set, and
- the response packet was received from the server configured not to use obfuscation, but the packet has TAC_PLUS_UNENCRYPTED_FLAG not set,
10.5.3. Authentication
To help TACACS+ administrators select stronger authentication options, TACACS+ servers MUST allow the administrator to configure the server to only accept challenge/response options for authentication (TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_CHAP or TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_MSCHAP or TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_MSCHAPV2 for authen_type).
TACACS+ server administrators SHOULD enable the option mentioned in the previous paragraph. TACACS+ server deployments SHOULD only enable other options (such as TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_ASCII or TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_PAP) when unavoidable due to requirements of identity/password systems.
TACACS+ server administrators SHOULD NOT allow the same credentials to be applied in challenge-based (TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_CHAP or TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_MSCHAP or TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_TYPE_MSCHAPV2) and non-challenge-based authen_type options, as the insecurity of the latter will compromise the security of the former.
TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SENDAUTH and TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_SENDPASS options mentioned in "The Draft" SHOULD NOT be used due to their security implications. TACACS+ servers SHOULD NOT implement them. If they must be implemented, the servers MUST default to the options being disabled and MUST warn the administrator that these options are not secure.
10.5.4. Authorization
The authorization and accounting features are intended to provide extensibility and flexibility. There is a base dictionary defined in this document, but it may be extended in deployments by using new argument names. The cost of the flexibility is that administrators and implementers MUST ensure that the argument and value pairs shared between the clients and servers have consistent interpretation.
TACACS+ clients that receive an unrecognized mandatory argument MUST evaluate server response as if they received TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_FAIL.
10.5.5. Redirection Mechanism
"The Draft" described a redirection mechanism (TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FOLLOW). This feature is difficult to secure. The option to send secret keys in the server list is particularly insecure, as it can reveal client shared secrets.
TACACS+ servers MUST deprecate the redirection mechanism.
If the redirection mechanism is implemented, then TACACS+ servers MUST disable it by default and MUST warn TACACS+ server administrators that it must only be enabled within a secure deployment due to the risks of revealing shared secrets.
TACACS+ clients SHOULD deprecate this feature by treating TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FOLLOW as TAC_PLUS_AUTHEN_STATUS_FAIL.
11. IANA Considerations
This document has no IANA actions.
12. References
12.1. Normative References
- [RFC0020]
-
V.G. Cerf, "ASCII format for network interchange", STD 80, RFC 20, DOI 10.17487/RFC0020, October 1969,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/ >.rfc20 - [RFC1321]
-
R. Rivest, "The MD5 Message-Digest Algorithm", RFC 1321, DOI 10.17487/RFC1321, April 1992,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/ >.rfc1321 - [RFC1334]
-
B. Lloyd, and W. Simpson, "PPP Authentication Protocols", RFC 1334, DOI 10.17487/RFC1334, October 1992,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/ >.rfc1334 - [RFC2119]
-
S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/ >.rfc2119 - [RFC2433]
-
G. Zorn, and S. Cobb, "Microsoft PPP CHAP Extensions", RFC 2433, DOI 10.17487/RFC2433, October 1998,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/ >.rfc2433 - [RFC2759]
-
G. Zorn, "Microsoft PPP CHAP Extensions, Version 2", RFC 2759, DOI 10.17487/RFC2759, January 2000,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/ >.rfc2759 - [RFC3579]
-
B. Aboba, and P. Calhoun, "RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service) Support For Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP)", RFC 3579, DOI 10.17487/RFC3579, September 2003,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/ >.rfc3579 - [RFC4086]
-
D. Eastlake 3rd, J. Schiller, and S. Crocker, "Randomness Requirements for Security", BCP 106, RFC 4086, DOI 10.17487/RFC4086, June 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/ >.rfc4086 - [RFC4120]
-
C. Neuman, T. Yu, S. Hartman, and K. Raeburn, "The Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)", RFC 4120, DOI 10.17487/RFC4120, July 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/ >.rfc4120 - [RFC5952]
-
S. Kawamura, and M. Kawashima, "A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text Representation", RFC 5952, DOI 10.17487/RFC5952, August 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/ >.rfc5952 - [RFC8174]
-
B. Leiba, "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, May 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/ >.rfc8174 - [RFC8265]
-
P. Saint-Andre, and A. Melnikov, "Preparation, Enforcement, and Comparison of Internationalized Strings Representing Usernames and Passwords", RFC 8265, DOI 10.17487/RFC8265, October 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/ >.rfc8265
12.2. Informative References
- [KRB4]
- S. Miller, C. Neuman, J. Schiller, and J. Saltzer, "Section E.2.1: Kerberos Authentication and Authorization System", December 1987.
- [THE-DRAFT]
-
D. Carrel, and L. Grant, "The TACACS+ Protocol Version 1.78", Internet-Draft draft-grant-tacacs-02, January 1997,
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/ >.draft-grant-tacacs-02 - [TZDB]
-
P. Eggert, and A. Olson, "Sources for Time Zone and Daylight Saving Time Data", 1987,
<https://www.iana.org/time-zones >.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the following reviewers whose comments and contributions made considerable improvements to this document: Alan DeKok, Alexander Clouter, Chris Janicki, Tom Petch, Robert Drake, and John Heasley, among many others.
The authors would particularly like to thank Alan DeKok, who provided significant insights and recommendations on all aspects of the document and the protocol. Alan DeKok has dedicated considerable time and effort to help improve the document, identifying weaknesses and providing remediation.
The authors would also like to thank the support from the OPSAWG Chairs and advisors, especially Joe Clarke.
Authors' Addresses
Thorsten Dahm
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View CA 94043
United States of America
Email: thorstendlux@google.com
Andrej Ota
Google Inc.
1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
Mountain View CA 94043
United States of America
Email: andrej@ota.si
Douglas C. Medway Gash
Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 West Tasman Dr.
San Jose CA 95134
United States of America
Email: dcmgash@cisco.com
David Carrel
IPsec Research
Email: carrel@ipsec.org
Lol Grant
Email: lol.grant@gmail.com
