Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETFspace
96959493929190898887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100
in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 8150

MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection MIB

Pages: 48
Proposed Standard
Part 1 of 2 – Pages 1 to 24
None   None   Next

Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 1
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                S. Kingston Smiler
Request for Comments: 8150                                   IP Infusion
Category: Standards Track                                  M. Venkatesan
ISSN: 2070-1721                                        Dell Technologies
                                                                 D. King
                                                      Old Dog Consulting
                                                               S. Aldrin
                                                            Google, Inc.
                                                                 J. Ryoo
                                                                    ETRI
                                                              April 2017


              MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection MIB

Abstract

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols. In particular, it defines objects for managing Multiprotocol Label Switching - Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) linear protection. Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8150.
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 2
Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction ....................................................3 2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework ......................3 3. Conventions .....................................................3 4. Overview ........................................................4 5. Structure of the MIB Module .....................................4 5.1. Textual Conventions ........................................4 5.2. The MPLS-TP Linear Protection Switching Subtree ............4 5.3. The Notifications Subtree ..................................5 5.4. The Table Structures .......................................5 6. Relationship to Other MIB Modules ...............................7 6.1. Relationship to the MPLS OAM Identifiers MIB Module ........7 7. Example of Protection Switching Configuration ...................7 8. Definitions .....................................................9 9. Security Considerations ........................................43 10. IANA Considerations ...........................................44 11. References ....................................................45 11.1. Normative References .....................................45 11.2. Informative References ...................................47 Acknowledgments ...................................................47 Contributors ......................................................47 Authors' Addresses ................................................48
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 3

1. Introduction

This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols. In particular, it defines objects for managing Multiprotocol Label Switching - Transport Profile (MPLS-TP) linear protection. This MIB module should be used for configuring and managing MPLS-TP linear protection for MPLS-TP Label Switched Paths (LSPs). At the time of this writing, Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) SET is no longer recommended as a way to configure MPLS networks as described in RFC 3812 [RFC3812]. However, since the MIB module specified in this document is intended to work in parallel with the MIB module for MPLS specified in [RFC3812] and the MIB module for MPLS-TP Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM) identifiers in RFC 7697 [RFC7697], certain objects defined here are specified with a MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write or read-create so that specifications of the base tables in [RFC3812] and [RFC7697] and the new MIB module in this document are consistent.

2. The Internet-Standard Management Framework

For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to section 7 of RFC 3410 [RFC3410]. Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP). Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in STD 58, RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC 2580 [RFC2580].

3. Conventions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14, RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 4

4. Overview

RFC 6378 [RFC6378] defines the protocol to provide a linear protection switching mechanism for MPLS-TP for a point-to-point LSP within the protection domain bounded by the endpoints of the LSP. RFC 7271 [RFC7271] describes alternative mechanisms to perform some of the functions defined in [RFC6378] and also defines additional mechanisms to provide operator control and experience that more closely model the behavior of linear protection seen in other transport networks. Two modes are defined for MPLS-TP linear protection switching: the Protection State Coordination (PSC) mode and the Automatic Protection Switching (APS) mode, as specified in [RFC6378] and [RFC7271], respectively. The detailed protocol specification of MPLS-TP linear protection is described in [RFC6378] and [RFC7271]. This document specifies a MIB module for Label Edge Routers (LERs) that support MPLS-TP linear protection as described in [RFC6378] and [RFC7271]. Objects defined in this document are generally applied to both the PSC mode and the APS mode. If an object is valid for a particular mode only, it is noted in the description for the object.

5. Structure of the MIB Module

5.1. Textual Conventions

The following new textual conventions are defined in this document: o MplsLpsReq: This textual convention describes an object that stores the PSC Request field of the PSC control packet. o MplsLpsFpathPath: This textual convention describes an object that stores the Fault Path (FPath) field and Data Path (Path) field of the PSC control packet. o MplsLpsCommand: This textual convention describes an object that allows a user to perform any action over a protection domain. o MplsLpsState: This textual convention describes an object that stores the current state of the PSC state machine.

5.2. The MPLS-TP Linear Protection Switching Subtree

MPLS-LPS-MIB is the MIB module defined in this document. It is rooted under the mplsStdMIB subtree per [RFC3811]. "LPS" as used in this document means "Linear Protection Switching".
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 5

5.3. The Notifications Subtree

Notifications are defined to inform the management station about switchovers, provisioning mismatches, and protocol failures of the linear protection domain. The following notifications are defined for this purpose: o The notification mplsLpsEventSwitchover informs the management station about the switchover of the active path. o The notification mplsLpsEventRevertiveMismatch informs the management station about a provisioning mismatch in the revertive mode across the endpoint of the protection domain. o The notification mplsLpsEventProtecTypeMismatch informs the management station about a provisioning mismatch in the protection type, representing both the bridge type and the switching type, across the endpoint of the protection domain. o The notification mplsLpsEventCapabilitiesMismatch informs the management station about a provisioning mismatch in Capabilities TLVs across the endpoint of the protection domain. o The notification mplsLpsEventPathConfigMismatch informs the management station about a provisioning mismatch in the protection path configuration for PSC communication. o The notification mplsLpsEventFopNoResponse informs the management station that protocol failure has occurred due to a lack of response to a traffic switchover request in 50 ms. o The notification mplsLpsEventFopTimeout informs the management station that protocol failure has occurred because no protocol message was received during at least 3.5 times the long PSC message interval [RFC7271].

5.4. The Table Structures

The MPLS-TP linear protection MIB module has four tables. The tables are as follows: o mplsLpsConfigTable This table is used to configure MPLS-TP linear protection domains. An MPLS-TP linear protection domain (or a protection domain) is identified by mplsLpsConfigDomainIndex. A protection domain consists of two LERs, as well as the working path and protection path that connect the two LERs. The objects in this table are
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 6
      used to configure properties that are specific to the protection
      domain.  Two Maintenance Entities (MEs) MUST be defined for each
      protection domain: one for the working path and the other for the
      protection path.  Therefore, two entries in the
      mplsLpsMeConfigTable, which is for configuring the MEs used in
      protection switching, are associated to one entry in this table.

   o  mplsLpsStatusTable

      This table provides the current status information of MPLS-TP
      linear protection domains that have been configured on the system.
      The entries in the mplsLpsStatusTable have an AUGMENTS
      relationship with the entries in the mplsLpsConfigTable.  When a
      protection domain is configured or deleted in the
      mplsLpsConfigTable, then the corresponding row of that session in
      the mplsLpsStatusTable is automatically created or deleted,
      respectively.

   o  mplsLpsMeConfigTable

      This table is used to associate MEs to the protection domain.
      Each protection domain requires two MEs.  One entry in the
      mplsLpsConfigTable is associated with two entries in this table:
      one for the working path and the other for the protection path of
      the protection domain.  The mplsLpsMeConfigPath object in this
      table indicates that the path is either the working path or the
      protection path.  The ME is identified by mplsOamIdMegIndex,
      mplsOamIdMeIndex, and mplsOamIdMeMpIndex, which are the same index
      values as the entry in the mplsOamIdMeTable defined in [RFC7697].
      The relationship to the mplsOamIdMeTable is described in
      Section 6.1.

   o  mplsLpsMeStatusTable

      This table provides current information about the protection
      status of MEs that have been configured on the system.  When an ME
      is configured or deleted in the mplsLpsMeConfigTable, then the
      corresponding row of that session in the mplsLpsMeStatusTable is
      automatically created or deleted, respectively.
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 7

6. Relationship to Other MIB Modules

6.1. Relationship to the MPLS OAM Identifiers MIB Module

Entries in the mplsOamIdMeTable [RFC7697] are extended by entries in the mplsLpsMeConfigTable. Note that the nature of the "extends" relationship is a sparse augmentation so that the entry in the mplsLpsMeConfigTable has the same index values as the entry in the mplsOamIdMeTable. Each time that an entry is created in the mplsOamIdMeTable for which the LER supports MPLS-TP linear protection, a row is created automatically in the mplsLpsMeConfigTable. When a point-to-point transport path needs to be monitored, one ME is needed for the path and one entry in the mplsOamIdMeTable will be created. But the ME entry in the mplsOamIdMeTable may or may not participate in protection switching. If an ME participates in protection switching, an entry in the mplsLpsMeConfigTable MUST be created, and the objects in the entry indicate which protection domain this ME belongs to and whether this ME is for the working path or the protection path. If the ME does not participate in protection switching, an entry in the mplsLpsMeConfigTable does not need to be created.

7. Example of Protection Switching Configuration

This example considers the protection domain configuration on an LER to provide protection for a co-routed bidirectional MPLS tunnel. For the working path and protection path of the protection domain, two Maintenance Entity Groups (MEGs) need to be configured, and each MEG contains one ME for a point-to-point transport path. For more information on the mplsOamIdMegTable and the mplsOamIdMeTable, see [RFC7697]. Although the example described in this section shows a way to configure linear protection for MPLS-TP tunnels, this also indicates how the MIB values would be returned if they had been configured by alternative means.
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 8
   The following table configures a protection domain.

   In the mplsLpsConfigTable:
   mplsLpsConfigEntry ::= SEQUENCE
   {
      -- Protection domain index (index to the table)
      mplsLpsConfigDomainIndex  = 3,
      -- Protection domain name
      mplsLpsConfigDomainName   = "LPDomain3",
      mplsLpsConfigMode         = psc(1),
      mplsLpsConfigProtectionType = oneColonOneBidirectional(2),
      -- Mandatory parameters needed to activate the row go here
      mplsLpsConfigRowStatus    = createAndGo(4)
   }

   The following table associates the MEs with the protection domain.

   In the mplsLpsMeConfigTable:
   MplsLpsMeConfigEntry ::= SEQUENCE
   {
      -- MEG index (index to the table)
      mplsOamIdMegIndex                 = 1,
      -- ME index (index to the table)
      mplsOamIdMeIndex                  = 1,
      -- Maintenance Point (MP) index (index to the table)
      mplsOamIdMeMpIndex                = 1,
      -- Protection domain this ME belongs to
      mplsLpsMeConfigDomain             = 3,
      -- Configuration state
      mplsLpsMeConfigPath               = working(1)
   }
   {
      -- MEG index (index to the table)
      mplsOamIdMegIndex                 = 2,
      -- ME index (index to the table)
      mplsOamIdMeIndex                  = 2,
      -- MP index (index to the table)
      mplsOamIdMeMpIndex                = 2,
      -- Protection domain this ME belongs to
      mplsLpsMeConfigDomain             = 3,
      -- Configuration state
      mplsLpsMeConfigPath               = protection(2)
   }
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 9

8. Definitions

This MIB module makes reference to the following documents: [RFC2578], [RFC2579], [RFC2580], [RFC3289], [RFC3411], [RFC3811], [RFC6378], [RFC7271], [RFC7697], [G8121], and [G8151]. MPLS-LPS-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN IMPORTS MODULE-IDENTITY, NOTIFICATION-TYPE, OBJECT-TYPE, Counter32, Unsigned32 FROM SNMPv2-SMI -- RFC 2578 MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP FROM SNMPv2-CONF -- RFC 2580 TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, RowStatus, TimeStamp, StorageType, TruthValue FROM SNMPv2-TC -- RFC 2579 SnmpAdminString FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB -- RFC 3411 IndexIntegerNextFree FROM DIFFSERV-MIB -- RFC 3289 mplsStdMIB FROM MPLS-TC-STD-MIB -- RFC 3811 mplsOamIdMegIndex, mplsOamIdMeIndex, mplsOamIdMeMpIndex FROM MPLS-OAM-ID-STD-MIB; -- RFC 7697 mplsLpsMIB MODULE-IDENTITY LAST-UPDATED "201704040000Z" -- April 4, 2017 ORGANIZATION "Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Working Group" CONTACT-INFO " Kingston Smiler Selvaraj IP Infusion RMZ Centennial Mahadevapura Post Bangalore 560048 India Email: kingstonsmiler@gmail.com
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 10
         Venkatesan Mahalingam
         Dell Technologies
         5450 Great America Parkway
         Santa Clara, CA  95054
         United States of America
         Email: venkat.mahalingams@gmail.com

         Daniel King
         Old Dog Consulting
         United Kingdom
         Email: daniel@olddog.co.uk

         Sam Aldrin
         Google, Inc.
         1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
         Mountain View, CA  94043
         United States of America
         Email: aldrin.ietf@gmail.com

         Jeong-dong Ryoo
         ETRI
         218 Gajeong-ro
         Yuseong-gu, Daejeon  34129
         South Korea
         Email: ryoo@etri.re.kr
         "
   DESCRIPTION
      "This MIB module supports the configuration and management of
       MPLS-TP linear protection domains.

       Copyright (c) 2017 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
       authors of the code.  All rights reserved.

       Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
       without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
       the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License
       set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
       Relating to IETF Documents
       (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info)."

   REVISION
      "201704040000Z"  -- April 4, 2017
      DESCRIPTION
         "MPLS-TP protection domain objects for
          LSP MEG End Points (MEPs)."

      ::= { mplsStdMIB 22 }
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 11
      -- Top-level components of this MIB module.
      -- Notifications
      mplsLpsNotifications
         OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { mplsLpsMIB 0 }

      -- Tables, scalars
      mplsLpsObjects
         OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { mplsLpsMIB 1 }

      -- Conformance
      mplsLpsConformance
         OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { mplsLpsMIB 2 }

   MplsLpsReq ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "This textual convention describes an object that stores
          the PSC Request field of the PSC control packet.  The values
          are as follows:

          noRequest
          No Request

          doNotRevert
          Do-not-Revert

          reverseRequest
          Reverse Request

          exercise
          Exercise

          waitToRestore
          Wait-to-Restore

          manualSwitch
          Manual Switch

          signalDegrade
          Signal Degrade (SD)

          signalFail
          Signal Fail (SF)
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 12
          forcedSwitch
          Forced Switch

          lockoutOfProtection
          Lockout of Protection."
      REFERENCE
         "Section 4.2.2 of RFC 6378 and Section 8 of RFC 7271"
      SYNTAX  INTEGER {
                 noRequest(0),
                 doNotRevert(1),
                 reverseRequest(2),
                 exercise(3),
                 waitToRestore(4),
                 manualSwitch(5),
                 signalDegrade(7),
                 signalFail(10),
                 forcedSwitch(12),
                 lockoutOfProtection(14)
                 }

   MplsLpsFpathPath ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
      DISPLAY-HINT "1x:"
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "This textual convention describes an object that stores
          the Fault Path (FPath) field and Data Path (Path) field of
          the PSC control packet.

          FPath is located in the first octet, and Path is
          located in the second octet.

          The value and the interpretation of the FPath field are
          as follows:

          2-255
          for future extensions

          1
          the anomaly condition is on the working path

          0
          the anomaly condition is on the protection path
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 13
          The value and the interpretation of the Path field are
          as follows:

          2-255
          for future extensions

          1
          protection path is transporting user data traffic

          0
          protection path is not transporting user data traffic."
      REFERENCE
         "Sections 4.2.5 and 4.2.6 of RFC 6378"
      SYNTAX      OCTET STRING (SIZE (2))

   MplsLpsCommand ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "This command allows a user to perform any action over a
          protection domain.  If the protection command cannot be
          executed because a request of equal or higher priority is
          in effect, an inconsistentValue error is returned.

          The command values are as follows:

          noCmd
          This value should be returned by a read request when no
          command has been written to the object in question since
          initialization.  This value may not be used in a write
          operation.  If noCmd is used in a write operation, a
          wrongValue error is returned.

          clear
          Clears all of the commands listed below for the protection
          domain.

          lockoutOfProtection
          Prevents switching traffic to the protection path.

          forcedSwitch
          Switches traffic from the working path to the protection path.

          manualSwitchToWork
          Switches traffic from the protection path to the working path.

          manualSwitchToProtect
          Switches traffic from the working path to the protection path.
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 14
          exercise
          Used to verify the correct operation of the PSC communication
          and the integrity of the protection path.  This command is not
          applicable to the PSC mode.

          freeze
          This command freezes the protection state and is a local
          command that is not signaled to the remote node.
          This command is not applicable to the PSC mode.

          clearfreeze
          Clears the local freeze.  This command is not applicable to
          the PSC mode."
      REFERENCE
         "Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of RFC 6378 and Sections 4.3 and 6 of
          RFC 7271"
      SYNTAX   INTEGER {
                  noCmd(1),
                  clear(2),
                  lockoutOfProtection(3),
                  forcedSwitch(4),
                  manualSwitchToWork(5),
                  manualSwitchToProtect(6),
                  exercise(7),
                  freeze(8),
                  clearfreeze(9)
                  }

   MplsLpsState ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "This textual convention describes an object that stores
          the current state of the PSC state machine.  The values
          are as follows:

          normal
          Normal state.

          unavLOlocal
          Unavailable state due to local LO command.

          unavSFPlocal
          Unavailable state due to local SF-P.

          unavSDPlocal
          Unavailable state due to local SD-P.
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 15
          unavLOremote
          Unavailable state due to remote LO message.

          unavSFPremote
          Unavailable state due to remote SF-P message.

          unavSDPremote
          Unavailable state due to remote SD-P message.

          protfailSFWlocal
          Protecting Failure state due to local SF-W.

          protfailSDWlocal
          Protecting Failure state due to local SD-W.

          protfailSFWremote
          Protecting Failure state due to remote SF-W message.

          protfailSDWremote
          Protecting Failure state due to remote SD-W message.

          switadmFSlocal
          Switching Administrative state due to local FS command.
          Same as Protecting Administrative state due to local FS
          command in the PSC mode.

          switadmMSWlocal
          Switching Administrative state due to local MS-W command.

          switadmMSPlocal
          Switching Administrative state due to local MS-P command.
          Same as Protecting Administrative state due to local MS
          command in the PSC mode.

          switadmFSremote
          Switching Administrative state due to remote FS message.
          Same as Protecting Administrative state due to remote FS
          message in the PSC mode.

          switadmMSWremote
          Switching Administrative state due to remote MS-W message.

          switadmMSPremote
          Switching Administrative state due to remote MS-P message.
          Same as Protecting Administrative state due to remote MS
          message in the PSC mode.
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 16
          wtr
          Wait-to-Restore state.

          dnr
          Do-not-Revert state.

          exerLocal
          Exercise state due to local EXER command.

          exerRemote
          Exercise state due to remote EXER message."
      REFERENCE
         "Sections 3 and 11 of RFC 7271"

      SYNTAX   INTEGER {
                  normal(1),
                  unavLOlocal(2),
                  unavSFPlocal(3),
                  unavSDPlocal(4),
                  unavLOremote(5),
                  unavSFPremote(6),
                  unavSDPremote(7),
                  protfailSFWlocal(8),
                  protfailSDWlocal(9),
                  protfailSFWremote(10),
                  protfailSDWremote(11),
                  switadmFSlocal(12),
                  switadmMSWlocal(13),
                  switadmMSPlocal(14),
                  switadmFSremote(15),
                  switadmMSWremote(16),
                  switadmMSPremote(17),
                  wtr(18),
                  dnr(19),
                  exerLocal(20),
                  exerRemote(21)
                  }
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 17
   -- Start of
   -- MPLS-TP Linear Protection Switching Configuration Table.
   -- This table supports the addition, configuration, and deletion
   -- of MPLS-TP linear protection domains.

   mplsLpsConfigDomainIndexNext OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      IndexIntegerNextFree (0..4294967295)
      MAX-ACCESS  read-only
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "This object contains an unused value for
          mplsLpsConfigDomainIndex, or a zero to indicate that
          the number of unassigned entries has been exhausted.
          Negative values are not allowed, as they do not correspond
          to valid values of mplsLpsConfigDomainIndex."
      ::= { mplsLpsObjects 1 }

   mplsLpsConfigTable OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      SEQUENCE OF MplsLpsConfigEntry
      MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "This table lists the MPLS-TP linear protection domains that
          have been configured on the system.
          An entry is created by a network operator who wants to run
          the MPLS-TP linear protection protocol for the protection
          domain."
      ::= { mplsLpsObjects 2 }

   mplsLpsConfigEntry OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      MplsLpsConfigEntry
      MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "A conceptual row in the mplsLpsConfigTable."
      INDEX { mplsLpsConfigDomainIndex }
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigTable 1 }

   MplsLpsConfigEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
      mplsLpsConfigDomainIndex         Unsigned32,
      mplsLpsConfigDomainName          SnmpAdminString,
      mplsLpsConfigMode                INTEGER,
      mplsLpsConfigProtectionType      INTEGER,
      mplsLpsConfigRevertive           INTEGER,
      mplsLpsConfigSdThreshold         Unsigned32,
      mplsLpsConfigSdBadSeconds        Unsigned32,
      mplsLpsConfigSdGoodSeconds       Unsigned32,
      mplsLpsConfigWaitToRestore       Unsigned32,
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 18
      mplsLpsConfigHoldOff             Unsigned32,
      mplsLpsConfigContinualTxInterval Unsigned32,
      mplsLpsConfigRapidTxInterval     Unsigned32,
      mplsLpsConfigCommand             MplsLpsCommand,
      mplsLpsConfigCreationTime        TimeStamp,
      mplsLpsConfigRowStatus           RowStatus,
      mplsLpsConfigStorageType         StorageType
   }

   mplsLpsConfigDomainIndex OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      Unsigned32 (1..4294967295)
      MAX-ACCESS  not-accessible
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "Index for the conceptual row identifying a protection domain.
          Operators should obtain new values for row creation in this
          table by reading mplsLpsConfigDomainIndexNext.

          When the value of this object is the same as the value of
          mplsLpsMeConfigDomain, the mplsLpsMeConfigDomain is defined
          as either the working path or the protection path for this
          protection domain."
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigEntry 1 }

   mplsLpsConfigDomainName OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      SnmpAdminString (SIZE (0..32))
      MAX-ACCESS  read-create
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "Textual name that represents the MPLS-TP linear protection
          domain.  It facilitates easy administrative identification of
          each protection domain."
      DEFVAL {""}
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigEntry 2 }
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 19
   mplsLpsConfigMode OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX INTEGER {
                psc(1),
                aps(2)
                }
      MAX-ACCESS  read-create
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "The mode of the MPLS-TP linear protection mechanism.  This can
          be either PSC or APS, as follows:

          PSC
          The Protection State Coordination mode as described in
          RFC 6378.

          APS
          The Automatic Protection Switching mode as described in
          RFC 7271.

          This object may not be modified if the associated
          mplsLpsConfigRowStatus object is equal to active(1).

          The value of this object is not supposed to be changed
          during operation.  When the value should be changed,
          the protection processes in both LERs MUST be
          restarted with the same new value.

          If this value is changed at one LER during operation,
          the LER will generate PSC packets with a new
          Capabilities TLV value.  This will result in
          mplsLpsEventCapabilitiesMismatch notifications at both LERs."
      REFERENCE
         "Sections 9.2 and 10 of RFC 7271"
      DEFVAL {psc}
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigEntry 3 }
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 20
   mplsLpsConfigProtectionType OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX INTEGER {
                onePlusOneUnidirectional(1),
                oneColonOneBidirectional(2),
                onePlusOneBidirectional(3)
                }
      MAX-ACCESS  read-create
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "The protection architecture type of the protection domain.
          This object represents both the bridge type, which can be
          either a permanent bridge (1+1) or a selector bridge (1:1);
          and the switching scheme, which can be either unidirectional
          or bidirectional.

          1+1
          In the 1+1 protection scheme, a fully dedicated protection
          path is allocated.  Data traffic is copied and fed at the
          source to both the working path and the protection path.
          The traffic on the working path and protection path is
          transmitted simultaneously to the sink of the protection
          domain, where selection between the working path and the
          protection path is performed.

          1:1
          In the 1:1 protection scheme, a protection path is allocated
          to protect against a defect, failure, or degradation on the
          working path.  In normal conditions, data traffic is
          transmitted over the working path, while the protection path
          functions in the idle state.  If there is a defect on the
          working path or a specific administrative request,
          traffic is switched to the protection path.

          bidirectional
          In the bidirectional protection scheme, both directions
          will be switched simultaneously even if the fault applies
          to only one direction of the path.

          unidirectional
          In the unidirectional protection scheme, protection switching
          will be performed independently for each direction of a
          bidirectional transport path.

          This object may not be modified if the associated
          mplsLpsConfigRowStatus object is equal to active(1)."
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 21
      REFERENCE
         "Section 4.2.3 of RFC 6378"
      DEFVAL {oneColonOneBidirectional}
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigEntry 4 }

   mplsLpsConfigRevertive OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      INTEGER { nonrevertive(1), revertive(2) }
      MAX-ACCESS  read-create
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "This object represents the reversion mode of the linear
          protection domain.  The reversion mode of the protection
          mechanism may be either revertive or non-revertive.

          nonrevertive
          In the non-revertive mode, after a service has been recovered,
          traffic will be forwarded on the protection path.

          revertive
          In the revertive mode, after a service has been recovered,
          traffic will be redirected back onto the original working
          path.

          This object may not be modified if the associated
          mplsLpsConfigRowStatus object is equal to active(1)."
      REFERENCE
         "Section 4.2.4 of RFC 6378"
      DEFVAL { revertive }
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigEntry 5 }

   mplsLpsConfigSdThreshold OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      Unsigned32 (0..100)
      MAX-ACCESS  read-create
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "This object holds the threshold value of the Signal Degrade
          (SD) defect in percent.  In order to detect the SD defect,
          the MPLS-TP packet loss measurement (LM) is performed
          every second.

          If either the packet loss is negative (i.e., there are more
          packets received than transmitted) or the packet loss ratio
          (lost packets/transmitted packets) in percent is greater than
          this threshold value, a Bad Second is declared.
          Otherwise, a Good Second is declared.
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 22
          The SD defect is detected if there are
          mplsLpsConfigSdBadSeconds consecutive Bad Seconds
          and cleared if there are
          mplsLpsConfigSdGoodSeconds consecutive Good Seconds.

          This object may be modified if the associated
          mplsLpsConfigRowStatus object is equal to active(1)."
      REFERENCE
         "Clause 6.1.3.3 of ITU-T Recommendation G.8121/Y.1381 and
          Table 8-1 of ITU-T Recommendation G.8151/Y.1374"
      DEFVAL { 30 }
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigEntry 6 }

   mplsLpsConfigSdBadSeconds OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      Unsigned32 (2..10)
      UNITS       "seconds"
      MAX-ACCESS  read-create
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "This object holds the number of Bad Seconds to detect the SD.

          If the number of consecutive Bad Seconds reaches this value,
          the SD defect is detected and used as an input to
          the protection switching process.

          This object may be modified if the associated
          mplsLpsConfigRowStatus object is equal to active(1)."
      REFERENCE
         "Clause 6.1.3.3 of ITU-T Recommendation G.8121/Y.1381 and
          Table 8-1 of ITU-T Recommendation G.8151/Y.1374"
      DEFVAL { 10 }
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigEntry 7 }

   mplsLpsConfigSdGoodSeconds OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      Unsigned32 (2..10)
      UNITS       "seconds"
      MAX-ACCESS  read-create
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "This object holds the number of Good Seconds to declare
          the clearance of an SD defect.

          After an SD defect occurs on a path, if the number of
          consecutive Good Seconds reaches this value for the
          degraded path, the clearance of the SD defect is declared
          and used as an input to the protection switching process.
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 23
          This object may be modified if the associated
          mplsLpsConfigRowStatus object is equal to active(1)."
      REFERENCE
         "Clause 6.1.3.3 of ITU-T Recommendation G.8121/Y.1381 and
          Table 8-1 of ITU-T Recommendation G.8151/Y.1374"
      DEFVAL { 10 }
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigEntry 8 }

   mplsLpsConfigWaitToRestore OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      Unsigned32 (5..12)
      UNITS       "minutes"
      MAX-ACCESS  read-create
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "This object holds the Wait-to-Restore timer value in minutes
          and can be configured in 1-minute intervals between 5 and
          12 minutes.

          The WTR timer is used to delay the reversion of the PSC state
          to the Normal state when recovering from a failure condition
          on the working path when the protection domain is configured
          for revertive behavior.

          This object may not be modified if the associated
          mplsLpsConfigRowStatus object is equal to active(1)."
      REFERENCE
         "Section 3.5 of RFC 6378"
      DEFVAL { 5 }
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigEntry 9 }

   mplsLpsConfigHoldOff OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      Unsigned32 (0..100)
      UNITS       "deciseconds"
      MAX-ACCESS  read-create
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "The hold-off time in deciseconds.  Represents the time
          between SF/SD condition detection and declaration of
          an SF/SD request to the protection switching logic.
          It is intended to avoid unnecessary switching when a
          lower-layer protection mechanism is in place.
          Can be configured in intervals of 100 milliseconds.

          When a new defect or a more severe defect occurs on
          the active path (the path from which the selector selects
          the user data traffic) and this value is non-zero,
          the hold-off timer will be started.  A defect on the standby
Top   ToC   RFC8150 - Page 24
          path (the path from which the selector does not select the
          user data traffic) does not trigger the start of the hold-off
          timer, as there is no need for a traffic switchover.

          This object may not be modified if the associated
          mplsLpsConfigRowStatus object is equal to active(1)."
      REFERENCE
         "Section 3.1 of RFC 6378"
      DEFVAL { 0 }
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigEntry 10 }

   mplsLpsConfigContinualTxInterval OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      Unsigned32 (1..20)
      UNITS       "seconds"
      MAX-ACCESS  read-create
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "The Continual Tx Time in seconds.  Represents the time
          interval to send the continual PSC packet to the other
          end, based on the current state.

          This object may not be modified if the associated
          mplsLpsConfigRowStatus object is equal to active(1)."
      REFERENCE
         "Section 4.1 of RFC 6378"
      DEFVAL { 5 }
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigEntry 11 }

   mplsLpsConfigRapidTxInterval OBJECT-TYPE
      SYNTAX      Unsigned32 (1000..20000)
      UNITS       "microseconds"
      MAX-ACCESS  read-create
      STATUS      current
      DESCRIPTION
         "The Rapid Tx interval in microseconds.  Represents the time
          interval to send the PSC packet to the other end, when
          there is a change in the state of the linear protection domain
          due to local input.  The default value is 3.3 milliseconds
          (3300 microseconds).

          This object may not be modified if the associated
          mplsLpsConfigRowStatus object is equal to active(1)."
      REFERENCE
         "Section 4.1 of RFC 6378"
      DEFVAL { 3300 }
      ::= { mplsLpsConfigEntry 12 }


(next page on part 2)

Next Section