Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                       B. Decraene
Request for Comments: 7537                                        Orange
Updates: 4379, 6424                                             N. Akiya
Category: Standards Track                                   C. Pignataro
ISSN: 2070-1721                                            Cisco Systems
                                                            L. Andersson
                                                               S. Aldrin
                                                     Huawei Technologies
                                                                May 2015


                IANA Registries for LSP Ping Code Points

Abstract

   RFCs 4379 and 6424 created name spaces for Multi-Protocol Label
   Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping.  However, those RFCs
   did not create the corresponding IANA registries for Downstream
   Mapping object Flags (DS Flags), Multipath Types, Pad TLVs, and
   Interface and Label Stack Address Types.

   There is now a need to make further code point allocations from these
   name spaces.  This document updates RFCs 4379 and 6424 in that it
   creates IANA registries for that purpose.

Status of This Memo

   This is an Internet Standards Track document.

   This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
   (IETF).  It represents the consensus of the IETF community.  It has
   received public review and has been approved for publication by the
   Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG).  Further information on
   Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.

   Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
   and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
   http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7537.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (c) 2015 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
   document authors.  All rights reserved.

   This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
   Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
   (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
   publication of this document.  Please review these documents
   carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
   to this document.  Code Components extracted from this document must
   include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
   the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
   described in the Simplified BSD License.

Table of Contents

   1.  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2
   2.  IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.1.  DS Flags  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.2.  Multipath Types . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3
     2.3.  Pad Type  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4
     2.4.  Interface and Label Stack Address Type  . . . . . . . . .   5
   3.  Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
   4.  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     4.1.  Normative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
     4.2.  Informative References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   6
   Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7

1.  Introduction

   [RFC4379] and [RFC6424] created name spaces for MPLS LSP Ping.
   However, those RFCs did not create the corresponding IANA registries
   for DS Flags, Multipath Types, Pad TLVs, and Interface and Label
   Stack Address Types.

   There is now a need to make further code point allocations from these
   name spaces.  In particular, [ENTROPY-LSP-PING] and [LSP-PING-LAG]
   request new DS Flags and Multipath Type allocations.

   This document updates [RFC4379] and [RFC6424] in that it creates IANA
   registries for that purpose.

   Note that "DS Flags" and "Multipath Type" are fields included in two
   TLVs defined in the "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label
   Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters - TLVs" registry: Downstream
   Mapping (DEPRECATED) (value 2) and Downstream Detailed Mapping (value
   20).  Modification to either registry will affect both TLVs.

2.  IANA Considerations

   Per this document, IANA has created new registries within the "Multi-
   Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping
   Parameters" [IANA-MPLS-LSP-PING] registry to maintain DS Flags,
   Multipath Types, Pad TLVs, and Interface and Label Stack Address
   Types fields.  The registry names and initial values are described in
   the immediate subsections that follow.

2.1.  DS Flags

   [RFC4379] defines the Downstream Mapping (DSMAP) TLV, which has Type
   2 assigned from the "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label
   Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters - TLVs" registry.

   [RFC6424] defines the Downstream Detailed Mapping (DDMAP) TLV, which
   has Type 20 assigned from the "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)
   Label Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters - TLVs" registry.

   DSMAP has been deprecated by DDMAP, but both TLVs share a field: DS
   Flags.

   IANA has created and now maintains a registry entitled "DS Flags".

   The registration policy for this registry is Standards Action
   [RFC5226].

   IANA has made the following initial assignments:

   Registry Name: DS Flags

    Bit number Name                                         Reference
    ---------- ----------------------------------------     ---------
          7    N: Treat as a Non-IP Packet                   RFC 4379
          6    I: Interface and Label Stack Object Request   RFC 4379
        5-0    Unassigned

2.2.  Multipath Types

   IANA has created and now maintains a registry entitled "Multipath
   Types".

   The registration policies [RFC5226] for this registry are as follows:

      0-250    Standards Action
    251-254    Experimental Use
        255    Standards Action

   IANA has made the following initial assignments:

   Registry Name: Multipath Types

    Value      Meaning                                  Reference
    ---------- ---------------------------------------- ---------
          0    no multipath                             RFC 4379
          1    Unassigned
          2    IP address                               RFC 4379
          3    Unassigned
          4    IP address range                         RFC 4379
        5-7    Unassigned
          8    Bit-masked IP address set                RFC 4379
          9    Bit-masked label set                     RFC 4379
     10-250    Unassigned
    251-254    Experimental Use                         This document
        255    Reserved                                 This document

2.3.  Pad Type

   IANA has created and now maintains a registry entitled "Pad Types".

   The registration policies [RFC5226] for this registry are:


      0-250    Standards Action
    251-254    Experimental Use
        255    Standards Action

   IANA has made the following initial assignments:

   Registry Name: Pad Types

    Value      Meaning                                  Reference
    ---------- ---------------------------------------- ---------
          0    Reserved                                 This document
          1    Drop Pad TLV from reply                  RFC 4379
          2    Copy Pad TLV to reply                    RFC 4379
      3-250    Unassigned
    251-254    Experimental Use                         This document
        255    Reserved                                 This document

2.4.  Interface and Label Stack Address Type

   IANA has created and now maintains a registry entitled "Interface and
   Label Stack Address Types".

   The registration policies [RFC5226] for this registry are:

      0-250    Standards Action
    251-254    Experimental Use
        255    Standards Action

   IANA has made the following initial assignments:

   Registry Name: Interface and Label Stack Address Types

    Value      Meaning                                  Reference
    ---------- ---------------------------------------- ---------
          0    Reserved                                 This document
          1    IPv4 Numbered                            RFC 4379
          2    IPv4 Unnumbered                          RFC 4379
          3    IPv6 Numbered                            RFC 4379
          4    IPv6 Unnumbered                          RFC 4379
      5-250    Unassigned
    251-254    Experimental Use                         This document
        255    Reserved                                 This document

3.  Security Considerations

   This document simply creates IANA registries for code points defined
   in [RFC4379] and [RFC6424].  Thus, there are no new security
   concerns.

4.  References

4.1.  Normative References

   [RFC4379]  Kompella, K. and G. Swallow, "Detecting Multi-Protocol
              Label Switched (MPLS) Data Plane Failures", RFC 4379,
              February 2006, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4379>.

   [RFC6424]  Bahadur, N., Kompella, K., and G. Swallow, "Mechanism for
              Performing Label Switched Path Ping (LSP Ping) over MPLS
              Tunnels", RFC 6424, November 2011,
              <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6424>.

4.2.  Informative References

   [ENTROPY-LSP-PING]
              Akiya, N., Swallow, G., Pignataro, C., Malis, A., and S.
              Aldrin, "Label Switched Path (LSP) and Pseudowire (PW)
              Ping/Trace over MPLS Network using Entropy Labels (EL)",
              Work in Progress, draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-00,
              December 2014.

   [IANA-MPLS-LSP-PING]
              IANA, "Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS) Label
              Switched Paths (LSPs) Ping Parameters",
              <http://www.iana.org/assignments/
              mpls-lsp-ping-parameters>.

   [LSP-PING-LAG]
              Akiya, N., Swallow, G., Litkowski, S., Decraene, B., and
              J. Drake, "Label Switched Path (LSP) Ping/Trace Multipath
              Support for Link Aggregation Group (LAG) Interfaces", Work
              in Progress, draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-lag-multipath-00,
              January 2015.

   [RFC5226]  Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
              IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
              May 2008, <http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5226>.

Authors' Addresses

   Bruno Decraene
   Orange

   EMail: bruno.decraene@orange.com


   Nobo Akiya
   Cisco Systems

   EMail: nobo.akiya.dev@gmail.com


   Carlos Pignataro
   Cisco Systems

   EMail: cpignata@cisco.com


   Loa Andersson
   Huawei Technologies

   EMail: loa@mail01.huawei.com


   Sam Aldrin
   Huawei Technologies

   EMail: aldrin.ietf@gmail.com