RFC 1415
FTP-FTAM Gateway Specification
Pages: 58
Historic
Historic
Part 1 of 3 – Pages 1 to 17
Network Working Group J. Mindel Request for Comments: 1415 R. Slaski Open Networks, Inc. January 1993 FTP-FTAM Gateway Specification Status of the Memo This RFC specifies an IAB standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Abstract This memo describes a dual protocol stack application layer gateway that performs protocol translation, in an interactive environment, between the FTP and FTAM file transfer protocols. Two key assumptions are made: 1) POSIX file naming conventions and hierarchical organization, rather than proprietary conventions are in use; and 2) X.500 Directory Services are available. Acknowledgments The authors of this RFC would like to express their appreciation to the individuals and organizations that participated in the implementation of the FTP-FTAM Application Layer Gateway and its fielding on the MILNET. Implementation credits go to Mr. John Scott, formerly of the MITRE Corporation, while fielding credits are extended to James Graham and R. Greg Lavender of Open Networks, Inc. (formerly NetWorks One) and Robert Cooney of the Naval Computer and Telecommunications Station (NCTS) Washington. Dr. Marshall Rose is to be commended for recognizing the importance of the FTP-FTAM gateway and promulgating it as a part of the ISO Development Environment (ISODE). The following individuals have provided valuable editorial comments: Larry Friedman, Donna Vincent and Michael Resnick of Digital Equipment Corporation; Robert Cooney of NCTS; and S.E. Hardcastle-Kille of University College London. Funding of the FTP-FTAM Gateway Request for Comments effort was provided by Open Networks Inc. and the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), formerly the Defense Communications Agency. DISA sponsors include Len Tabacchi, George Bradshaw, Tom Clarke, and Betsy Turner.
Table of Contents 1. Introduction..................................................2 1.1. Relationship to Other Work ................................3 1.2. Overview of Gateway Operation .............................4 2. Gateway Architecture..........................................6 3. Network Naming and Addressing.................................8 4. Use of the Gateway Services...................................9 4.1. FTP-Initiated Gateway Service .............................9 4.2. FTAM-Initiated Gateway Service ...........................11 4.3. Summary of Usage .........................................12 5. Gateway State Variables and Transitions......................13 5.1. FTP-Initiated Gateway Service ............................14 5.2. FTAM-Initiated Gateway Service ...........................16 6. Document Type Support........................................18 6.1. Notes on NBS-9 ...........................................18 7. Functional Comparison of FTP and FTAM........................19 7.1. Loss of Functionality ....................................20 8. Mapping of Protocol Functions and Representations.............20 8.1. FTP-Initiated Gateway Service .............................22 8.2. FTAM-Initiated Gateway Service ............................38 9. Mapping between FTP Reply Codes and FTAM Parameters...........47 9.1. FTP Reply Codes to FTAM Parameters ........................48 9.2. FTAM Parameters to FTP Reply Codes ........................50 9.3. Future Mapping Problem ....................................54 9.4. Error Handling ............................................54 10. Implementation and Configuration Guidelines..................54 10.1. Robustness ...............................................54 10.2. Well-Known TCP/IP Port ...................................55 10.3. Gateway Listener Processes ...............................55 10.4. Implementation Testing ...................................55 10.5. POSIX File Naming and Organization .......................55 11. Security Considerations......................................55 12. References...................................................56 13. Authors' Addresses...........................................58 1. Introduction The TCP/IP and OSI protocol suites will coexist in the Internet community for several years to come. As more and more OSI hosts are fielded on the Internet, the requirement for gateways between the two protocol suites becomes more pressing. This specification describes an application layer gateway providing interoperability between the TCP/IP File Transfer Protocol (FTP) and the OSI File Transfer, Access, and Management (FTAM) protocol. The proposed application layer gateway is based on a bi-directional set of mappings between the FTP and FTAM protocols. Since the protocols
have quite different command structures, the mappings between them are not one-to-one. This paper assumes knowledge of the File Transfer Protocol (FTP) [RFC959] and the File Transfer, Access, and Management Protocol (FTAM) [ISO8571-1,2,3,4,5]. Two important goals of the mappings are to: Provide FTP users with as much emulated FTP capability on an FTAM Responder as possible, and Provide FTAM users with as much emulated FTAM capability on an FTP Server as possible. Though it is anticipated that the application layer gateway will be implemented on full protocol suites of both TCP/IP and OSI, at least one implementation of such a gateway (included in the ISO Development Environment) can be configured to operate FTAM over either OSI or TCP/IP lower-layer services. 1.1. Relationship to Other Work Ideas presented in this specification are based on lessons learned in fielding the gateway on the MILNET, operational at NCTS Washington D.C. since 1989, and on the efforts of M. A. Wallace et al. of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) [NIST86]. In 1986, NIST published a design document for an FTP-FTAM gateway. Since that time, at least one implementation (for a subset of the FTP and FTAM protocols) of the gateway has been developed [MITRE87] and is included with the ISODE. This implementation is based on the NIST protocol translator gateway design [NIST86]. This document's contribution to the advancement of the FTP-FTAM gateway concept is to: * Enhance the user interaction capability provided by the ISODE implementation of the FTP-FTAM application layer gateway. * Clarify and enhance the mappings (FTP to FTAM, FTAM to FTP) documented by NIST. * Provide guidelines for fielding the FTP-FTAM application layer gateway on the Internet so that it is useful as an Internet resource. * Produce a formal specification for the FTP-FTAM gateway suitable for implementors to use in building additional FTP-FTAM gateways.
* Provide a formal specification for organizations wishing to
procure FTP-FTAM gateways.
1.2. Overview of Gateway Operation
The gateway provides a virtual end-to-end application file transfer
service. As data is sent via FTP, the gateway immediately maps the
requested function to FTAM and passes it to the FTAM host. In a
similar fashion, but using a different set of mappings, an FTAM
request is sent to the gateway, immediately mapped to an FTP
function, and passed along to the FTP host.
In FTP, the two parties involved in a file transfer are the Client
and Server. The Client is responsible for initiating a connection to
the Server. Once the connection is established, all service requests
originate from the Client. The FTP-FTAM gateway does not support the
FTP three node model.
In FTAM, the two parties involved in a file transfer are the
Initiator and Responder. The Initiator is responsible for initiating
a connection to the Responder. Once the connection is established,
either the Initiator or Responder may issue service requests to the
other.
The FTP-FTAM gateway provides two sets of services:
1. FTP-Initiated Gateway Services
Utilized when an FTP Client contacts the FTP-FTAM gateway to
instigate a file transfer with an FTAM Responder.
2. FTAM-Initiated Gateway Services
Utilized when an FTAM Initiator contacts the FTP-FTAM
gateway to instigate a file transfer with an FTP Server.
The gateway services' names were selected to identify the roles that
the FTP-FTAM gateway plays when performing file transfers. For
example, when a file transfer is instigated by an FTP Client, it
contacts the FTP Server portion of the gateway, which maps protocol
information to the FTAM Initiator portion of the gateway, which in
turn contacts the remote FTAM Responder. This example scenario uses
the FTP-Initiated Gateway Services.
Figure 1 illustrates the perspective of the application process in
the FTP-Initiated service. Figure 2 illustrates that of the FTAM-
Initiated service.
TCP Host OSI Host
+--------------+ +------------------+
| FTP Client | | FTAM Responder |
+--------------+ +------------------+
| |
| |
| |
| FTP-FTAM Gateway |
| +--------------------------------+ |
+-- | FTP Server FTAM Initiator | --+
+--------------------------------+
Figure 1 - FTP-Initiated Gateway Service
TCP Host OSI Host
+--------------+ +------------------+
| FTP Server | | FTAM Initiator |
+--------------+ +------------------+
| |
| |
| |
| |
| FTP-FTAM Gateway |
| +--------------------------------+ |
+-- | FTP Client FTAM Responder | --+
+--------------------------------+
Figure 2 - FTAM-Initiated Gateway Service
2. Gateway Architecture
The gateway architecture, termed a protocol translator [NIST86], is
depicted in Figure 3. It implements TCP/IP and OSI protocol stacks
with an application level process providing the link between the two.
The link between FTP and FTAM is defined by two sets of protocol
mappings, one each for the FTP-Initiated and FTAM-Initiated service
sets.
+------------+ +-------------+
| FTP Host | | FTAM Host |
+------------+ +-------------+
| |
| |
| |
| |
| +---------------------------------+ |
| | FTP - FTAM | |
| | Gateway Application | |
| |---------------------------------| |
| | FTP | FTAM | |
| |----------------+----------------| |
| | TCP/IP | TP4/et al | |
| +---------------------------------+ |
| /|\ /|\ |
| | | |
+------------+ +-------------+
Figure 3 - Gateway Protocol Stack
A fundamental aspect of this gateway architecture is that data is
mapped and transmitted immediately; i.e., no transferred file need
ever reside on the gateway file system. In the context of this
document, the term "filesystem" refers to the file access and
maintenance mechanisms provided by the operating system. This lack
of gateway filesystem interaction helps speed up the end-to-end data
transfer. Another speed-enhancing feature of this architecture is
that both the FTP and FTAM network connections can operate
simultaneously. Additional advantages include:
1. FTP and FTAM hosts require no modification to utilize gateway
services.
2. Users require no knowledge of the other protocol.
3. Gateway access control is not impaired (since users cannot
directly access the gateway filesystem).
4. No additional filesystem space is required on the gateway.
5. Interactive nature of protocols is preserved.
6. Users become aware of fatal errors immediately.
Disadvantages of this design include the initial coding effort
required to develop the gateway and the subsequent re-coding efforts
required to keep it current.
3. Network Naming and Addressing
The network naming and addressing schemes used by FTP (Domain Names
(DN), IP Addresses) and FTAM (Distinguished Names, Presentation
Addresses) are quite different. This issue is quite apparent when a
user of one protocol needs to identify a destination host of the
other protocol.
In the TCP/IP naming and addressing scheme, the identity of the FTP
Server is its DN and its IP address [RFC1101]. To initiate a
connection to an FTP Server, the FTP Client looks up a DN in either
the Domain Name System (DNS) or static host table and obtains an IP
address.
In the OSI naming and addressing scheme, the identity of the FTAM
Responder service is its Distinguished Name in the OSI Directory
(X.500 or static table) and its Presentation address. The
Distinguished Name is an authoritative description of the service. A
Presentation address consists of a Presentation selector, a session
selector, a transport selector, and a network address. To initiate a
connection to an FTAM Responder, the FTAM Initiator contacts the OSI
Directory, presents the Distinguished Name of the desired FTAM
Responder and asks for the Presentation address attribute associated
with that name.
An alternative to the direct use of Distinguished Names is to use
"User Friendly Naming", as defined in [Kille92]. Gateway support for
"User Friendly Naming" is recommended, but not required.
4. Use of the Gateway Services 4.1. FTP-Initiated Gateway Service The FTP Client uses the FTP-Initiated gateway service to utilize the resources of an FTAM Responder. To initiate a file transfer from an FTP Client, the Client connects to the FTP-Initiated gateway service via TCP/IP. The gateway then establishes a connection, via OSI, to the FTAM Responder. At this point, the user can initiate file transfer operations. The FTP Client is responsible for providing the gateway with an authoritative Distinguished Name, or a User Friendly Name, of the desired OSI filestore. It is the responsibility of the gateway to resolve this Distinguished Name, or User Friendly Name, to its corresponding Presentation address. The logon sequence taken by an FTP Client when initiating a file transfer with an FTAM Responder is given below: % ftp gateway ftp> site Distinguished-Name-of-FTAM Responder ftp> user username ftp> pass password The "ftp gateway" command initiates the connection between the FTP Client and the gateway. Once connected to the gateway, the FTP Client should identify the desired FTAM Responder service via the Responder's Distinguished Name, or User Friendly Name, which is resolved by an algorithm running on the Directory Services provider. This information is sent via a "site Distinguished-Name-of-FTAM Responder" or "site UFN-of-FTAM Responder" command. Upon receipt of a Distinguished Name or a User Friendly Name, it is the gateway's responsibility to resolve it to the Presentation Address associated with that name. This resolution is done by contacting the OSI Directory (X.500 or local static table) and presenting the Distinguished Name or User Friendly Name. Once the Presentation address is obtained, the gateway can attempt a connection with the ultimate destination file transfer service represented by this Presentation address. The userid is passed via the "user username" command, and the password is passed via the "pass password". If the FTAM Responder requires a password, a password prompt should appear after issuing the "user username" command. It is anticipated that stronger authentication mechanisms will be required for DoD gateways in the
future.
Using a specific example, suppose an FTAM Responder has the following
Distinguished Name:
CountryName = "US"
Organization = "Open Networks"
OrganizationalUnit = "Network Services"
CommonName = "netwrx1"
CommonName = "FTAM service"
and the FTP-FTAM gateway is available at "washdc1-osigw.navy.mil".
The FTP user action will appear as:
% ftp washdc1-osigw.navy.mil
ftp> site "c=US@o=Open Networks@ou=Network Services@cn=netwrx1
@cn=FTAM service"
ftp> user mindel
ftp> pass ***********
The "ftp washdc1-osigw.navy.mil" command initiates the connection
between the FTP Client and the FTP-FTAM gateway at the Washington
Navy Yard, Washington D.C. Once connected, the OSI filestore at Open
Networks is identified via its Distinguished Name, "@c=US@o=Open
Networks@ou=Network Services@cn=netwrx1@cn=FTAM service".
Alternatively, a User Friendly Name, such as:
"netwrx1, Open Networks, us"
can be specified, enabling the following FTP user action:
% ftp washdc1-osigw.navy.mil
ftp> site "netwrx1, Open Networks, us"
ftp> user mindel
ftp> pass ***********
As this example indicates, use of an intermediate gateway is not
transparent. To partially alleviate this awkwardness, the gateway
can be made more transparent through the registration of the FTAM
host in the DNS using the address of the gateway [RFC1279].
An example will clarify this point. Suppose that the "netwrx1, Open
Networks, us" FTAM host is registered in the TCP/IP DNS with the DN
of "ftam-service.netwrx1.com" and the IP address of the "washdc1-
osigw.navy.mil" gateway. In this example, the following set of user
actions is required:
% ftp ftam-service.netwrx1.com
ftp> user mindel
ftp> pass ***********
Since the "ftam-service.netwrx1.com" really points to the gateway
address, the first command will connect the FTP Client to the
gateway. The gateway will then use the name (using [RFC1279]) to
determine where the actual FTAM host is resident. Gateway support
for RFC1279 is recommended, but not required.
4.2. FTAM-Initiated Gateway Service
The FTAM Initiator uses the FTAM-Initiated gateway service to utilize
the resources of an FTP Server.
To initiate a file transfer from an FTAM Initiator, the Initiator
connects to the FTAM-Initiated gateway service via OSI. The gateway
then establishes a connection, via TCP/IP, to the FTP Server. At
this point, the user can initiate file transfer operations.
The FTAM Initiator is responsible for providing the gateway with an
authoritative DN of the desired TCP/IP filestore. It is the
responsibility of the gateway to resolve this DN to its corresponding
IP address.
The logon sequence taken by an FTAM Initiator when initiating a file
transfer with an FTP Server is given below:
% ftam gateway
ftam> user username@DNS-string
ftam> pass password
The "ftam gateway" command initiates the connection between the FTAM
Initiator and the gateway. Once connected, userid and TCP/IP
filestore are identified in the "username@DNS-string" argument to the
user command. If the FTP Server requires a password, a password
prompt should appear after issuing the user command.
The gateway should incorporate the BIND Resolver functionality so
that upon receipt of a Domain Name, the Gateway FTP Client can
resolve it via the distributed Domain Name System.
Using a specific example, suppose that a FTP Server has the following
Domain Name: "ftp-service.netwrx1.com" and an FTP-FTAM gateway is
available at:
CountryName = "US"
Organization = "GOV"
OrganizationalUnit = "DOD"
OrganizationalUnit = "DISA"
Locality = "Washington Navy Yard"
CommonName = "wnyosi7"
The FTAM user action will appear as:
% ftam @c=US@o=GOV@ou=DOD@ou=DISA@l=Washington Navy Yard
@cn=wnyosi7
ftam> user mindel@ftp-service.netwrx1.com
ftam> pass ***********
Alternatively, a User Friendly Name could be used rather than the
Distinguished Name.
As mentioned in the previous section, "Use of the FTP-Initiated
Gateway Service", use of an intermediate gateway is not transparent.
The gateway can be made more transparent through the registration of
the FTP host in the X.500 OSI Directory. By querying the X.500 OSI
Directory, the gateway can identify where the actual host is
resident.
For example, suppose that the FTP Server in the previous example
("ftp-service.netwrx1.com") is registered in the X.500 Directory with
the following Distinguished Name:
CountryName = "US"
Organization = "Open Networks"
OrganizationalUnit = "Network Services"
CommonName = "netwrx1"
CommonName = "FTP service"
and the Presentation Address of the FTP-FTAM gateway. This approach,
described in [RFC1279], would permit the following user interactions:
% ftam @c=US@o=Open Networks@ou=Network Services
@cn=netwrx1@cn=FTP Service"
ftam> user mindel
ftam> pass ***********
4.3. Summary of Usage
As shown in the discussions of the FTP-Initiated and FTAM-Initiated
Gateway Services, the gateway user does not have access to the
gateway filesystem; he merely makes use of the gateway logon
procedure to specify the ultimate destination userid and password.
Two methods of interaction with the gateway were described. In the
former, the user must:
1. Be aware that a gateway is required to reach the
destination FTP or FTAM host.
2. Determine which gateway is most appropriate for their
respective source-destination pair.
3. Explicitly connect to the gateway host prior to connecting
to the destination host.
Needless to say, the exchange of files between FTP and FTAM hosts
requires more effort than that required for the exchange of files
between a pair of hosts utilizing the same file transfer protocol.
The latter, more transparent method does not necessarily require that
the user determine which gateway is most appropriate for their
respective source-destination pair. In fact, filestore service
providers are registered using the address of a predetermined
gateway. With this approach, the user:
1. Must be aware that a gateway is required to reach the
destination FTP or FTAM host.
2. Need not determine which gateway is most appropriate to
access their ultimate destination host.
3. Need not explicitly connect to the gateway prior to
connecting to the destination FTP or FTAM host.
5. Gateway State Variables and Transitions
As described, the FTP-FTAM gateway provides two sets of services:
FTP-Initiated and FTAM-Initiated. Each service has its own mutually
exclusive set of state variables and transitions that
deterministically define the actions of the gateway. Gateway support
for these state variables and transitions is required.
For conciseness in this discussion, FTP-Initiated will be abbreviated
with "FTP-I", and FTAM-Initiated will be abbreviated with "FTAM-I".
Concerning error conditions, if a connection is dropped when the
gateway is in any state other than FTP-I:Initial-State or FTAM-
I:Initial-State, then the gateway will issue a fatal error message to
the host with the remaining connection, and then drop that
connection. If the remaining host is an FTP Client, then the gateway
will send an ABOR, QUIT, and 426 reply code (Connection closed,
transfer aborted). If it is an FTAM Initiator, then the gateway will send an F-P-ABORT with a <Diagnostic> value with identifier 1011 (Lower layer failure), as well as any known <Further Details>. Other error conditions are not addressed in this discussion. 5.1. FTP-Initiated Gateway Service The set of state variables for the FTP-Initiated Gateway service follow: State Variable State Definition ---------------------------------------------------------------- FTP-I:Initial-State Initial state of FTP-Initiated Gateway service. Gateway is waiting for an FTP Client to issue a USER command in order to proceed with connection establishment with remote FTAM Responder. If SITE or ACCT commands are sent while waiting for USER command, save arguments for subsequent use. FTP-I:Wait-for-PASS Gateway has already received USER command from FTP Client, as well as userid and destination host DN. Gateway is waiting for the FTAM Responder logon password. FTP-I:Wait-for-PAddress Gateway has already received PASS command from FTP Client. Gateway is resolving the provided FTAM Responder's address to a Presentation Address. The provided address may be a Distinguished Name, User Friendly Name, or Domain Name. Resolution will typically be done using X.500 directory services. FTP-I:Wait-for-Connection Gateway has initiated a connection to the FTAM Responder and is waiting for notification as to whether or not the logon is successful. FTP-I:Wait-for-ClientCmd Connection exists between FTP Client and FTAM Responder. Gateway is waiting for next command or response from FTP
Client. Commands and responses are
mapped as they are received.
FTP-I:Wait-for-RespondrCmd Connection exists between FTP Client
and FTAM Responder. Gateway is waiting
for next command or response from FTAM
Responder. Commands and responses are
mapped as they are received.
Each of the possible state transitions is provided in the remainder
of Section 5.1. For each state transition, the actions causing the
transition are listed.
5.1.1. FTP-I:Initial-State --> FTP-I:Initial-State
1. Gateway receives SITE or ACCT command from FTP Client.
SITE argument includes Distinguish Name of FTAM Responder.
5.1.2. FTP-I:Initial-State --> FTP-I:Wait-for-PASS
1. Gateway receives USER command from FTP Client. Arguments
include Distinguished Name of FTAM Responder and userid on
FTAM responder.
5.1.3. FTP-I:Wait-for-PASS --> FTP-I:Wait-for-PAddress
1. Gateway receives PASS command from FTP Client.
5.1.4. FTP-I:Wait-for-PAddress --> FTP-I:Wait-for-Connection
1. Gateway resolves received Distinguished Name, User Friendly
Name, or Domain Name of FTAM Responder to OSI Presentation
address.
2. Gateway sends F-INITIALIZE to FTAM Responder with
Presentation Address in <Called Presentation Address>,
userid in <Initiator Identity>, and password in <Filestore
Password>.
5.1.5. FTP-I:Wait-for-Connection --> FTP-I:Wait-for-NextMapping
1. Gateway receives <State Result> of "Success" .
2. Gateway sends 230 reply code (User Logged In) to FTP
Client.
5.1.6. FTP-I:Wait-for-ClientCmd --> FTP-I:Wait-for-RespondrCmd
1. Gateway receives command or response from FTP Client and
maps it to FTAM protocol, as defined in section 8.1.
5.1.7. FTP-I:Wait-for-RespondrCmd --> FTP-I:Wait-for-ClientCmd 1. Gateway receives command or response from FTAM Responder and maps it to FTP protocol, as defined in section 8.1. 5.1.8. FTP-I:Wait-for-ClientCmd --> FTP-I:Wait-for-USER 1. Gateway receives QUIT command from FTP Client; maps QUIT as per Section 8.1. 5.2. FTAM-Initiated Gateway Service The set of state variables for the FTAM-Initiated Gateway service follow: State Variable State Definition ---------------------------------------------------------------- FTAM-I:Initial-State Initial state of FTAM-Initiated Gateway Service. Gateway is waiting for an FTAM Initiator to issue an F-INITIALIZE command in order to proceed with connection establishment with remote FTP Server. FTAM-I:Wait-for-IPAddress Gateway has already received F- INITIALIZE from FTAM Initiator. Gateway is resolving the provided FTP Server's address to an IP address. The provided address may be a Domain Name, Distinguished Name, or User Friendly Name. FTAM-I:Wait-for-Connection Gateway has initiated a connection to the FTP Server and is waiting for notification as to whether or not the logon is successful. FTAM-I:Wait-for-InitiatrCmd Connection exists between FTAM Initiator and FTP Server. Gateway is waiting for next command or response from FTAM Initiator. Commands and responses are mapped as they are received.
FTP-I:Wait-for-ServerCmd Connection exists between FTAM
Initiator and FTP Server. Gateway is
waiting for next command or response
from FTP Server. Commands and
responses are mapped as they are
received.
Each of the possible state transitions is provided in the remainder
of Section 5.2. For each state transition, the actions causing the
transition are listed.
5.2.1. FTAM-I:Initial-State --> FTAM-I:Wait-for-IPAddress
1. Gateway receives F-INITIALIZE from FTAM Initiator. Domain
Name of FTP Server is either in <Responding Presentation
Address> or in the "@host" portion of the <Initiator
Identity> parameter. The userid is in <Initiator
Identity>, and password is in <Filestore Password>
parameter.
5.2.2. FTAM-I:Wait-for-IPAddress --> FTAM-I:Wait-for-Connection
1. Gateway resolves received Domain Name, Distinguished Name,
or User Friendly Name of FTP Server to IP address.
2. Gateway sends USER to FTP Server.
3. Gateway sends PASS to FTP Server.
5.2.3. FTAM-I:Wait-for-Connection --> FTAM-I:Wait-for-NextMapping
1. Gateway receives 230 reply code (User Logged In) from FTP
Server.
2. Gateway sends <State Result> of "Success" to FTAM
Initiator.
5.2.4 FTAM-I:Wait-for-InitiatrCmd --> FTAM-I:Wait-for-ServerCmd
1. Gateway receives command or response from FTAM Initiator
and maps it to FTP protocol, as defined in section 8.2.
5.2.5. FTAM-I:Wait-for-ServerCmd --> FTAM-I:Wait-for-InitiatrCmd
1. Gateway receives command or response from FTP Server and
maps it to FTAM protocol, as defined in section 8.2.
5.2.6. FTAM-I:Wait-for-InitiatrCmd --> FTAM-I:Wait-for-INITIALIZE
1. Gateway receives F-CLOSE primitive from FTAM Initiator;
maps F-CLOSE as per Section 8.2.
(next page on part 2)