Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETFspace
959493929190898887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100
in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 4049

BinaryTime: An Alternate Format for Representing Date and Time in ASN.1

Pages: 7
Obsoleted by:  6019

ToP   noToC   RFC4049 - Page 1
Network Working Group                                        R. Housley
Request for Comments: 4049                               Vigil Security
Category: Experimental                                       April 2005


                              BinaryTime:
      An Alternate Format for Representing Date and Time in ASN.1

Status of This Memo

   This memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet
   community.  It does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
   Discussion and suggestions for improvement are requested.
   Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Copyright Notice

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

Abstract

This document specifies a new ASN.1 type for representing time: BinaryTime. This document also specifies an alternate to the signing-time attribute for use with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) SignedData and AuthenticatedData content types; the binary- signing-time attribute uses BinaryTime. CMS and the signing-time attribute are defined in RFC 3852.

1. Introduction

This document specifies a new ASN.1 [ASN1] type for representing time: BinaryTime. This ASN.1 type can be used to represent date and time values. This document also specifies an alternative to the signing-time attribute used with the Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) [CMS] SignedData and AuthenticatedData content types, allowing the BinaryTime type to be used instead of the traditional UTCTime and GeneralizedTime types.

1.1. BinaryTime

Many operating systems represent date and time as an integer. This document specifies an ASN.1 type for representing date and time in a manner that is also an integer. Although some conversion may be necessary due to the selection of a different epoch or a different granularity, an integer representation has several advantages over the UTCTime and GeneralizedTime types.
ToP   noToC   RFC4049 - Page 2
   First, a BinaryTime value is smaller than either a UTCTime or a
   GeneralizedTime value.

   Second, in some operating systems, the value can be used with little
   or no conversion.  Conversion, when it is needed, requires only
   straightforward computation.  If the endian ordering is different
   from the ASN.1 representation of an INTEGER, then straightforward
   manipulation is needed to obtain an equivalent integer value.  If the
   epoch is different than the one chosen for BinaryTime, addition or
   subtraction is needed to compensate.  If the granularity is something
   other than seconds, then multiplication or division is needed to
   compensate.  Also, padding may be needed to convert the variable-
   length ASN.1 encoding of INTEGER to a fixed-length value used in the
   operating system.

   Third, date comparison is very easy with BinaryTime.  Integer
   comparison is easy, even when multi-precision integers are involved.
   Date comparison with UTCTime or GeneralizedTime can be complex when
   the two values to be compared are provided in different time zones.

   This is a rare instance which both memory and processor cycles can be
   saved.

1.2. Binary Signing Time Attribute

The signing-time attribute is defined in [CMS]. The alternative binary-signing-time attribute is defined in this document in order to obtain the benefits of the BinaryTime type.

1.3. Terminology

In this document, the key words MUST, MUST NOT, REQUIRED, SHOULD, SHOULD NOT, RECOMMENDED, MAY, and OPTIONAL are to be interpreted as described in [STDWORDS].

2. BinaryTime Definition

The BinaryTime ASN.1 type is used to represent an absolute time and date. A positive integer value is used to represent time values based on coordinated universal time (UTC), which is also called Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) and ZULU clock time. The syntax for BinaryTime is: BinaryTime ::= INTEGER (0..MAX)
ToP   noToC   RFC4049 - Page 3
   The integer value is the number of seconds, excluding leap seconds,
   after midnight UTC, January 1, 1970.  This time format cannot
   represent time values prior to January 1, 1970.  The latest UTC time
   value that can be represented by a four-octet integer value is
   03:14:07 on January 19, 2038, which is represented by the hexadecimal
   value 7FFFFFFF.  Time values beyond 03:14:07 on January 19, 2038, are
   represented by integer values that are longer than four octets, and a
   five-octet integer value is sufficient to represent dates covering
   the next seventeen millennia.

   This specification uses a variable-length encoding of INTEGER.  This
   permits any time value after midnight UTC, January 1, 1970, to be
   represented.

   When encoding an integer value that consists of more than one octet,
   which includes almost all the time values of interest, the bits of
   the first octet and bit 8 of the second octet MUST NOT all be ones or
   all zeros.  This rule ensures that an integer value is always encoded
   in the smallest possible number of octets.  However, it means that
   implementations cannot assume a fixed length for the integer value.

3. Binary Signing Time Attribute Definition

The binary-signing-time attribute type specifies the time at which the signer (purportedly) performed the signing process. The binary- signing-time attribute type is intended for use in the CMS SignedData content type; however, the attribute can also be used with the AuthenticatedData content type. The binary-signing-time attribute MUST be a signed attribute or an authenticated attribute; it MUST NOT be an unsigned attribute, unauthenticated attribute, or unprotected attribute. The following object identifier identifies the binary-signing-time attribute: id-aa-binarySigningTime OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9) smime(16) aa(2) 46 } The binary-signing-time attribute values have ASN.1 type BinarySigningTime: BinarySigningTime ::= BinaryTime
ToP   noToC   RFC4049 - Page 4
   In [CMS], the SignedAttributes syntax and the AuthAttributes syntax
   are each defined as a SET OF Attributes.  However, the binary-
   signing-time attribute MUST have a single attribute value, even
   though the syntax is defined as a SET OF AttributeValue.  There MUST
   NOT be zero or multiple instances of AttributeValue present.

   The SignedAttributes contained in the signerInfo structure within
   SignedData MUST NOT include multiple instances of the binary-
   signing-time attribute.  Similarly, the AuthAttributes in an
   AuthenticatedData MUST NOT include multiple instances of the binary-
   signing-time attribute.

   No requirement is imposed concerning the correctness of the signing
   time itself, and acceptance of a purported signing time is a matter
   of a recipient's discretion.  It is expected, however, that some
   signers, such as time-stamp servers, will be trusted implicitly.

4. References

This section provides normative and informative references.

4.1. Normative References

[ASN1] CCITT. Recommendation X.208: Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1). 1988. [CMS] Housley, R., "Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS)", RFC 3852, July 2004. [STDWORDS] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

4.2. Informative References

[TSP] Adams, C., Cain, P., Pinkas, D., and R. Zuccherato, "Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure Time-Stamp Protocol (TSP)", RFC 3161, August 2001.

5. Security Considerations

Use of the binary-signing-time attribute does not necessarily provide confidence in the time when the signature value was produced. Therefore, acceptance of a purported signing time is a matter of a recipient's discretion. RFC 3161 [TSP] specifies a protocol for obtaining time stamps from a trusted entity.
ToP   noToC   RFC4049 - Page 5
   The original signing-time attribute defined in [CMS] has the same
   semantics as the binary-signing-time attribute specified in this
   document.  Therefore, only one of these attributes SHOULD be present
   in the signedAttrs of a SignerInfo object or in the authAttrs of an
   AuthenticatedData object.  However, if both of these attributes are
   present, they MUST provide the same date and time.
ToP   noToC   RFC4049 - Page 6

Appendix A: ASN.1 Module

The ASN.1 module contained in this appendix defines the structures that are needed to implement this specification. It is expected to be used in conjunction with the ASN.1 modules in [CMS]. BinarySigningTimeModule { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs-9(9) smime(16) modules(0) 27 } DEFINITIONS IMPLICIT TAGS ::= BEGIN -- BinaryTime Definition BinaryTime ::= INTEGER (0..MAX) -- Signing Binary Time Attribute id-aa-binarySigningTime OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { iso(1) member-body(2) us(840) rsadsi(113549) pkcs(1) pkcs9(9) smime(16) aa(2) 46 } BinarySigningTime ::= BinaryTime END

Author's Address

Russell Housley Vigil Security, LLC 918 Spring Knoll Drive Herndon, VA 20170 USA EMail: housley@vigilsec.com
ToP   noToC   RFC4049 - Page 7
Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2005).

   This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
   contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
   retain all their rights.

   This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
   OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
   ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
   INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
   INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
   WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
   made any independent effort to identify any such rights.  Information
   on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
   found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.

   Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
   assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
   attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
   such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
   specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
   http://www.ietf.org/ipr.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF at ietf-
   ipr@ietf.org.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.