Tech-
invite
3GPP
space
IETF
space
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
4‑5x
Content for
TR 45.914
Word version: 16.0.0
0…
4…
7…
8…
9…
11…
8
Adaptive symbol constellation
8.1
Concept Description
8.2
Performance Characterization
8.3
Impacts on the Mobile Station
8.4
Impacts on the BSS
8.5
Impacts on Network Planning
8.6
Impacts on the Specification
8.7
Summary of Evaluation versus Objectives
8.8
References
...
8
Adaptive symbol constellation
Word‑p. 137
8.1
Concept Description
8.1.1
Symbol Constellation for the Downlink
8.1.2
-QPSK Modulator
Word‑p. 138
8.1.3
Choice of Symbol Constellation
Word‑p. 139
8.1.4
Adaptive Constellation Rotation
Word‑p. 140
8.1.5
Frequency hopping
Word‑p. 142
8.1.5.1
Legacy support
Word‑p. 145
8.1.5.2
Additional signaling
8.1.6
SAM - Single Antenna MIMO - for VAMOS
8.1.6.1
Concept description
8.1.6.1.1
Computational Complexity
Word‑p. 147
8.2
Performance Characterization
8.2.1
Link Level Performance
8.2.1.1
Simulation assumptions
Word‑p. 148
8.2.1.2
Sensitivity Performance
Word‑p. 149
8.2.1.2.1
SAIC receiver
8.2.1.2.1.1
Support of legacy mobiles
Word‑p. 151
8.2.1.2.2
MUROS receiver
Word‑p. 152
8.2.1.2.2.1
Symbol Constellation Detection
8.2.1.2.2.2
Constellation Rotation Detection
Word‑p. 153
8.2.1.2.3
SIC receiver
Word‑p. 154
8.2.1.2.3.1
Investigations by Telefon AB LM Ericsson
8.2.1.2.3.1.1
Simulation assumptions
8.2.1.2.3.1.2
Performance Plots
Word‑p. 155
8.2.1.2.3.2
Investigations by ST-NXP Wireless France
Word‑p. 156
8.2.1.2.3.2.1
Simulation Assumptions
8.2.1.2.3.2.2
Simulation Results for Downlink
Word‑p. 157
8.2.1.3
Interference Performance
Word‑p. 159
8.2.1.3.1
non-SAIC receiver
8.2.1.3.2
SAIC receiver
Word‑p. 161
8.2.1.3.2.1
Adaptive Constellation Rotation
Word‑p. 169
8.2.1.3.3
MUROS receiver
Word‑p. 171
8.2.1.3.3.1
Constellation Rotation Detection
8.2.1.3.4
SIC receiver
Word‑p. 172
8.2.1.3.4.1
Investigations by Telefon AB LM Ericsson
8.2.1.3.4.1.1
Simulation assumptions
8.2.1.3.4.1.2
Performance Plots for MTS Test Scenarios
Word‑p. 173
8.2.1.3.4.2
Investigations by ST-NXP Wireless France
Word‑p. 176
8.2.1.3.4.2.1
Introduction
8.2.1.3.4.2.2
Simulation Assumptions for Uplink
Word‑p. 177
8.2.1.3.4.2.3
Simulation Results for Uplink
Word‑p. 178
8.2.1.3.4.2.4
Simulation Assumptions for Downlink
Word‑p. 181
8.2.1.3.4.2.5
Simulation Results for Downlink
8.2.1.3.4.2.6
Conclusions
Word‑p. 185
8.2.1.3.5
SAM Receiver for VAMOS
8.2.1.3.5.1
Simulation assumptions
8.2.1.3.5.2
Performance plots
Word‑p. 186
8.2.1.4
Results from: MUROS - Performance of Alpha-QPSK with Legacy DARP MS
Word‑p. 191
8.2.1.4.1
Simulation Assumptions
8.2.1.4.1.1
Legacy Terminals
8.2.1.4.1.2
Transmitted MUROS Signal
Word‑p. 192
8.2.1.4.1.3
Alpha-QPSK
8.2.1.4.1.4
MUROS Interference Models
Word‑p. 193
8.2.1.4.1.5
Other Simulation Parameters
8.2.1.4.2
Downlink Performance Results
8.2.1.4.2.1
Sensitivity Performance
8.2.1.4.2.2
MTS-1 Performance
Word‑p. 194
8.2.1.4.2.3
MTS-2 Performance
Word‑p. 195
8.2.1.4.2.4
MTS-3 Performance
Word‑p. 196
8.2.1.4.2.5
MTS-4 Performance
Word‑p. 197
8.2.1.4.3
Summary of Results
Word‑p. 198
8.2.2
Network Level Performance
8.2.2.1
Adaptive constellation rotation
8.2.2.2
Support of legacy non-DARP Phase I receivers using ∝-QPSK
Word‑p. 199
8.2.2.2a
Downlink power control using ∝-QPSK
Word‑p. 200
8.2.2.2.1
SCPIR distributions in different system simulations
Word‑p. 201
8.2.2.3
Evaluation of VAMOS MAIO hopping
Word‑p. 202
8.2.2.3a
MAIO Hopping Scheme Methodology
Word‑p. 203
8.2.2.3a.1
MAIO Hopping Sequence Generation
8.2.2.3a.2
Channel Allocation and Adaptation
8.2.2.3a.3
Power Control
Word‑p. 204
8.2.2.3a.4
Mechanism for Applying MAIO Hopping
8.2.2.3a.5
Penetration Levels and MS Types
8.2.2.3a.6
Link 2 System Interface
8.2.2.3a.7
System Performance Evaluation
8.2.2.3a.7.1
Simulation assumption
8.2.2.3a.7.2
Channel modes
Word‑p. 205
8.2.2.3a.7.3
Minimum call quality performance
8.2.2.3a.7.4
System performance results
8.2.2.4
Evaluation of wide pulse for VAMOS
Word‑p. 206
8.2.2.4.1
Background
8.2.2.4.2
Methodology
Word‑p. 207
8.2.2.4.2.1
Power control
Word‑p. 208
8.2.2.4.2.2
Channel allocation
8.2.2.4.2.3
Modelling of link performance
8.2.2.4.3
Results
8.2.2.4.3.1
Simulation assumptions
8.2.2.4.3.2
System capacity gains
8.2.2.4.3.2.1
MUROS-2, MS penetration scenario I
8.2.2.4.3.2.2
MUROS-2, MS penetration scenario II
Word‑p. 209
8.2.2.4.3.2.3
MUROS-3A and MUROS3-B, MS penetrations scenario I
8.2.2.4.3.2.4
MUROS-3A and MUROS3-B, MS penetrations scenario I
Word‑p. 210
8.2.2.4.3.3
Impact on legacy users
8.2.2.4.3.3.1
MUROS-2
Word‑p. 211
8.2.2.4.3.4
Discussion
Word‑p. 213
8.2.3
Verification of Link to System Mapping
8.2.3.1
Methodology, DL
8.2.3.1.1
Interference scenarios
8.2.3.1.2
Raw BER verification levels
Word‑p. 214
8.2.3.1.3
Interference statistics
Word‑p. 215
8.2.3.1.4
Adjacent channel interference
8.2.3.1.5
Mappings
8.2.3.2
Verification, DL
Word‑p. 217
8.2.3.2.1
SAIC
8.2.3.2.2
non-SAIC
Word‑p. 219
8.2.3.2.3
SAM
Word‑p. 221
8.2.4
Verfication of 4-dimension Link to System Mapping
Word‑p. 223
8.2.4.1
Methodology, DL
8.2.4.2
Simulation, DL
Word‑p. 224
8.2.4.3
Verification, DL
Word‑p. 225
8.2.5
Methodology and verification of integrated link simulator modeling
Word‑p. 227
8.2.5.1
Methodology
8.2.5.1.1
Interferers
8.2.5.1.1.1
Interferer types
8.2.5.1.1.2
Limit of interferers
8.2.5.1.1.2.1
Limiting the number of interferers
8.2.5.1.1.2.2
Requirement on modeled energy level
Word‑p. 228
8.2.5.1.1.2.3
Conservation of energy
8.2.6
Results
8.2.6.1
Limit of number of interferers
8.2.6.2
Impact on simulated system capacity
Word‑p. 229
8.3
Impacts on the Mobile Station
Word‑p. 230
8.3.1
Legacy mobile stations
8.3.2
Mobile stations supporting Adaptive symbol constellation
8.4
Impacts on the BSS
8.5
Impacts on Network Planning
Word‑p. 231
8.6
Impacts on the Specification
8.7
Summary of Evaluation versus Objectives
8.7.1
Performance objectives
8.7.2
Compatibility objectives
Word‑p. 232
8.8
References
Word‑p. 234