Network Services are considered end-to-end, this means from a Terminal Equipment (TE) to another TE. An End-to-End Service may have a certain Quality of Service (QoS) which is provided for the user of a network service. It is the user that decides whether he is satisfied with the provided QoS or not.
To realise a certain network QoS a Bearer Service with clearly defined characteristics and functionality is to be set up from the source to the destination of a service.
A bearer service includes all aspects to enable the provision of a contracted QoS. These aspects are among others the control signalling, user plane transport and QoS management functionality. A UMTS bearer service layered architecture is depicted in
Figure 1, each bearer service on a specific layer offers it's individual services using services provided by the layers below.
On its way from the TE to another TE the traffic has to pass different bearer services of the network(s). A TE is connected to the UMTS network by use of a Mobile Termination (MT). The End-to-End Service on the application level uses the bearer services of the underlying network(s). As the End-to-End Service is conveyed over several networks (not only UMTS) it is not subject for further elaboration in the present document.
The End-to-End-Service used by the TE will be realised using a TE/MT Local Bearer Service, a UMTS Bearer Service, and an External Bearer Service.
TE/MT Local Bearer Service is not further elaborated here as this bearer service is outside the scope of the UMTS network.
Having said that the End-to-End Bearer Service is beyond the scope of the present document it is however the various services offered by the UMTS Bearer Service that the UMTS operator offers. It is this bearer service that provides the UMTS QoS.
The External Bearer Service is not further elaborated here as this bearer may be using several network services, e.g. another UMTS Bearer Service.
As described in the previous clause it is the UMTS Bearer Service that provides the UMTS QoS. The UMTS Bearer Service consists of two parts, the Radio Access Bearer Service and the Core Network Bearer Service. Both services reflects the optimised way to realise the UMTS Bearer Service over the respective cellular network topology taking into account such aspects as e.g. mobility and mobile subscriber profiles.
The Radio Access Bearer Service provides confidential transport of signalling and user data between MT and CN Edge Node with the QoS adequate to the negotiated UMTS Bearer Service or with the default QoS for signalling. This service is based on the characteristics of the radio interface and is maintained for a moving MT.
If unequal error protection shall be supported, it is provided by underlying Radio Bearer Services. In this case the payload of the user data SDU, transported by the Radio Access Bearer Service, shall conform to a SDU format defined with possible exact sizes and the payload bits statically structured per size. Each bit of the SDU payload belongs to a defined subflow. At Radio Access Bearer Service establishment, the exact SDU payload format and required reliability per subflow is signalled to RAN using standardised attributes (see
clause 6.4.3).
In release 1999, unequal error protection for a Radio Access Bearer is only applicable for services using a codec integrated in the core network. This implies that UMTS Bearer service can not use the attribute SDU format information to define subflows and the payload bits of the SDUs will therefore be equally protected.
The Core Network Bearer Service of the UMTS core network connects the UMTS CN Edge Node with the CN Gateway to the external network. The role of this service is to efficiently control and utilise the backbone network in order to provide the contracted UMTS bearer service. The UMTS packet core network shall support different backbone bearer services for variety of QoS.
The Radio Access Bearer Service is realised by a Radio Bearer Service and an RAN Access -Bearer Service.
The Radio Bearer Service covers all the aspects of the radio interface transport. This bearer service is provided by the UTRAN FDD/TDD or the GERAN, which are not elaborated further in the present document.
To support unequal error protection, RAN and MT shall have the ability to segment/reassemble the user flows into the different subflows requested by the Radio Access Bearer Service. The segmentation/ reassemble is given by the SDU payload format signalled at Radio Access Bearer establishment. The Radio Bearer service handles the part of the user flow belonging to one subflow, according to the reliability requirements for that subflow.
The RAN Access Bearer Service together with the Physical Bearer Service provides the transport between RAN and CN. RAN Access bearer services for packet traffic shall provide different bearer services for variety of QoS. The RAN Access Bearer Service is provided by the Iu or the Gb Bearer Service.
The Core Network Bearer Service uses a generic Backbone Network Service.
The Backbone Network Service covers the layer 1/Layer2 functionality and is selected according to operator's choice in order to fulfil the QoS requirements of the Core Network Bearer Service. The Backbone Network Service is not specific to UMTS but may reuse an existing standard.
The purpose of this clause is to give a comprehensive overview of functionality needed to establish, modify and maintain a UMTS Bearer Service with a specific QoS. The relations between the functions internal to the nodes are implementation specific. The allocation of these functions to the UMTS entities shall indicate the requirement for the specific entity to enforce the QoS commitments negotiated for the UMTS bearer service. The specific realisation of these functions is implementation dependent and has only to maintain the specified QoS characteristics. The QoS management functions of all UMTS entities together shall ensure the provision of the negotiated service between the access points of the UMTS bearer service. The end-to-end service is provided by translation/mapping with UMTS external services.
When defining the UMTS QoS classes, also referred to as traffic classes, the restrictions and limitations of the air interface have to be taken into account. It is not reasonable to define complex mechanisms as have been in fixed networks due to different error characteristics of the air interface. The QoS mechanisms provided in the cellular network have to be robust and capable of providing reasonable QoS resolution. Table 1 illustrates the QoS classes for UMTS.
There are four different QoS classes:
-
conversational class;
-
streaming class;
-
interactive class; and
-
background class.
The main distinguishing factor between these QoS classes is how delay sensitive the traffic is: Conversational class is meant for traffic which is very delay sensitive while Background class is the most delay insensitive traffic class.
Conversational and Streaming classes are mainly intended to be used to carry real-time traffic flows. The main divider between them is how delay sensitive the traffic is. Conversational real-time services, like video telephony, are the most delay sensitive applications and those data streams should be carried in Conversational class.
Interactive class and Background are mainly meant to be used by traditional Internet applications like WWW, Email, Telnet, FTP and News. Due to looser delay requirements, compare to conversational and streaming classes, both provide better error rate by means of channel coding and retransmission. The main difference between Interactive and Background class is that Interactive class is mainly used by interactive applications, e.g. interactive Email or interactive Web browsing, while Background class is meant for background traffic, e.g. background download of Emails or background file downloading. Responsiveness of the interactive applications is ensured by separating interactive and background applications. Traffic in the Interactive class has higher priority in scheduling than Background class traffic, so background applications use transmission resources only when interactive applications do not need them. This is very important in wireless environment where the bandwidth is low compared to fixed networks.
However, these are only typical examples of usage of the traffic classes. There is in particular no strict one-to-one mapping between classes of service (as defined in
TS 22.105) and the traffic classes defined in this TS. For instance, a service interactive by nature can very well use the Conversational traffic class if the application or the user has tight requirements on delay.
The most well known use of this scheme is telephony speech (e.g. GSM). But with Internet and multimedia a number of new applications will require this scheme, for example voice over IP and video conferencing tools. Real time conversation is always performed between peers (or groups) of live (human) end-users. This is the only scheme where the required characteristics are strictly given by human perception.
Real time conversation scheme is characterised by that the transfer time shall be low because of the conversational nature of the scheme and at the same time that the time relation (variation) between information entities of the stream shall be preserved in the same way as for real time streams. The maximum transfer delay is given by the human perception of video and audio conversation. Therefore the limit for acceptable transfer delay is very strict, as failure to provide low enough transfer delay will result in unacceptable lack of quality. The transfer delay requirement is therefore both significantly lower and more stringent than the round trip delay of the interactive traffic case.
Real time conversation - fundamental characteristics for QoS:
-
preserve time relation (variation) between information entities of the stream;
-
conversational pattern (stringent and low delay).
When the user is looking at (listening to) real time video (audio) the scheme of real time streams applies. The real time data flow is always aiming at a live (human) destination. It is a one way transport.
This scheme is one of the newcomers in data communication, raising a number of new requirements in both telecommunication and data communication systems. It is characterised by that the time relations (variation) between information entities (i.e. samples, packets) within a flow shall be preserved, although it does not have any requirements on low transfer delay.
The delay variation of the end-to-end flow shall be limited, to preserve the time relation (variation) between information entities of the stream. But as the stream normally is time aligned at the receiving end (in the user equipment), the highest acceptable delay variation over the transmission media is given by the capability of the time alignment function of the application. Acceptable delay variation is thus much greater than the delay variation given by the limits of human perception.
Real time streams - fundamental characteristics for QoS:
-
preserve time relation (variation) between information entities of the stream.
When the end-user, that is either a machine or a human, is on line requesting data from remote equipment (e.g. a server), this scheme applies. Examples of human interaction with the remote equipment are: web browsing, data base retrieval, server access. Examples of machines interaction with remote equipment are: polling for measurement records and automatic data base enquiries (tele-machines).
Interactive traffic is the other classical data communication scheme that on an overall level is characterised by the request response pattern of the end-user. At the message destination there is an entity expecting the message (response) within a certain time. Round trip delay time is therefore one of the key attributes. Another characteristic is that the content of the packets shall be transparently transferred (with low bit error rate).
Interactive traffic - fundamental characteristics for QoS:
-
request response pattern;
-
preserve payload content.
When the end-user, that typically is a computer, sends and receives data-files in the background, this scheme applies. Examples are background delivery of E-mails, SMS, download of databases and reception of measurement records.
Background traffic is one of the classical data communication schemes that on an overall level is characterised by that the destination is not expecting the data within a certain time. The scheme is thus more or less delivery time insensitive. Another characteristic is that the content of the packets shall be transparently transferred (with low bit error rate).
Background traffic - fundamental characteristics for QoS:
-
the destination is not expecting the data within a certain time;
-
preserve payload content.
Traffic class |
Conversational class conversational RT |
Streaming class streaming RT |
Interactive class Interactive best effort |
Background Background best effort |
Fundamental characteristics |
Preserve time relation (variation) between information entities of the stream
Conversational pattern (stringent and low delay)
|
Preserve time relation (variation) between information entities of the stream
|
Request response pattern
Preserve payload content
|
Destination is not expecting the data within a certain time
Preserve payload content
|
Example of the application | voice | streaming video | Web browsing | background download of emails |