Content for TR 38.854 Word version: 18.0.0
6 FR2 high speed feasibility evaluation
6.1 Evaluation Parameters
6.2 Channel model for FR2 HST
6.3 FR2 Feasibility Evaluation
7 Identified RAN4 requirements
7.1 CPE RF core requirements
7.2 RRM requirements
7.3 Demodulation performance requirements
8 Conclusion
$ Change history
6 FR2 high speed feasibility evaluation p. 17
6.1 Evaluation Parameters p. 17
6.1.1 RRH antenna array parameters for evaluation p. 17
6.1.2 RRH antenna element parameters for evaluation p. 18
6.1.3 CPE antenna array parameters for evaluation p. 18
6.1.4 CPE antenna element parameters for evaluation p. 18
6.2 Channel model for FR2 HST p. 19
6.2.1 Pathloss model used for link budget evaluation p. 19
6.2.2 Channel modelling for performance requirements p. 21
6.3 FR2 Feasibility Evaluation p. 25
6.3.1 Idle/inactive mode p. 25
6.3.2 Connected mode p. 25
6.3.2.1 Number of Rx beams p. 25
6.3.2.1.1 Scenario-A p. 26
6.3.2.1.2 Scenario-B p. 27
6.3.3 Link Performance and Throughput Performance p. 31
6.3.3.1 Link Performance Evaluation from Samsung p. 31
6.3.3.1.1 Scenario-A, Uni-directional RRH Deployment p. 31
6.3.3.1.2 Scenario-A, Bi-directional RRH Deployment p. 33
6.3.3.1.3 Scenario-B, Uni-directional RRH Deployment p. 35
6.3.3.1.4 Scenario-B, Bi-directional RRH Deployment p. 35
6.3.3.2 Link performance Evaluation from Huawei p. 35
6.3.3.2.1 Scenario A p. 35
6.3.3.2.2 Scenario B p. 37
6.3.3.3 Link level performance from Ericsson p. 42
6.3.3.3.1 Scenario-A, Uni-directional RRH Deployment p. 42
6.3.3.3.2 Scenario-A, Bi-directional RRH Deployment p. 44
6.3.3.3.3 Scenario-B, Uni-directional RRH Deployment p. 45
6.3.3.3.4 Scenario-B, Bi-directional RRH Deployment p. 48
6.3.3.4 Throughput Performance from Nokia p. 49
6.3.4 Mobility Performance p. 53
6.3.4.1 System-level evaluation of mobility performance by Nokia p. 54
6.3.4.1.1 Legacy RRM requirement mobility performance p. 54
6.3.4.1.1.1 Uni-directional Scenario-A without DPS p. 55
6.3.4.1.1.2 Uni-directional Scenario-A with DPS p. 58
6.3.4.1.1.3 Uni-directional Scenario-B without DPS p. 60
6.3.4.1.1.4 Uni-directional Scenario-B with DPS p. 62
6.3.4.1.1.5 Bi-directional Scenario-B without DPS p. 64
6.3.4.1.1.6 Bi-directional Scenario-B with DPS p. 67
6.3.4.1.1.7 Bi-directional Scenario-A without DPS p. 69
6.3.4.1.1.8 Bi-directional Scenario-A with DPS p. 71
6.3.4.1.2 Enhanced RRM requirement mobility performance p. 72
6.3.4.1.2.1 Uni-directional Scenario-A without DPS p. 75
6.3.4.1.2.2 Uni-directional Scenario-A with DPS p. 77
6.3.4.1.2.3 Uni-directional Scenario-B without DPS p. 79
6.3.4.1.2.4 Uni-directional Scenario-B with DPS p. 81
6.3.4.1.2.5 Bi-directional Scenario-B without DPS p. 83
6.3.4.1.2.6 Bi-directional Scenario-B with DPS p. 86
6.3.4.1.2.7 Bi-directional Scenario-A without DPS p. 88
6.3.4.1.2.8 Bi-directional Scenario-A with DPS p. 90
6.3.4.1.2.9 Uni-directional Tunnel scenario without DPS p. 92
6.3.4.1.2.10 Uni-directional Tunnel scenario with DPS p. 94
6.3.4.1.2.11 Transition at the tunnel entrance/exit without DPS p. 96
6.3.4.1.3 Conclusions on mobility performance p. 100
6.3.5 Receive time difference p. 103
6.3.6 Maximum supported Doppler frequency p. 103
6.3.7 Maximum supported Speed p. 103
6.3.8 Beam dwelling time p. 104
6.3.8.1 Simulation results p. 104
6.3.8.2 Beam coverage analysis p. 109
7 Identified RAN4 requirements p. 112
7.1 CPE RF core requirements p. 112
7.1.1 Minimum Peak EIRP p. 114
7.1.2 Beam Correspondence p. 115
7.2 RRM requirements p. 116
7.2.1 Idle/inactive mode p. 117
7.2.2 Connected mode p. 117
7.3 Demodulation performance requirements p. 122
8 Conclusion p. 141
$ Change history p. 142
