Tech-
invite
3GPP
space
IETF
space
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
4‑5x
Content for
TR 36.886
Word version: 14.1.0
0…
2…
2
References
3
Definitions and abbreviations
4
Background
5
Deployment and Coexistence Studies
6
B41 HPUE transmitter characteristics
7
B41 HPUE receiver characteristics
8
Other specification impacts (if applicable)
9
Conclusion
$
Change History
2
References
p. 7
3
Definitions and abbreviations
p. 7
3.1
Definitions
p. 7
3.2
Abbreviations
p. 8
4
Background
p. 8
4.1
Justification
p. 8
4.2
Objective
p. 8
5
Deployment and Coexistence Studies
p. 9
5.1
General
p. 9
5.2
Band 41
p. 9
5.3
Band 7
p. 9
5.4
Band 38
p. 10
5.5
Impact to TDD/FDD carrier aggregation band combinations
p. 10
5.6
WiFi
p. 10
5.7
Regulatory Requirements
p. 11
5.7.1
MS Transmit Power
p. 11
5.7.2
UE Emission Limits
p. 11
5.8
Co-existence and compatibility of LTE systems deployed in the 2.5 GHz band
p. 11
5.8.1
Simulation assumptions
p. 11
5.8.1.1
Macro cell Propagation model
p. 11
5.8.1.1.1
Macro cell Propagation model - Urban and Suburban Areas
p. 11
5.8.1.1.2
Macro cell Propagation model - Rural Area
p. 11
5.8.1.2
Power Control Modelling
p. 11
5.8.1.2.1
Power Control Simulation Reflects Deployments
p. 13
5.8.1.2.2
Parameter Values Choices
p. 15
5.8.1.2.3
Scenario 1 - UL Cell Throughput below Maximum Capacity
p. 15
5.8.1.2.4
Scenario 2 - UL is at Max Cell Capacity, all RBs Utilized
p. 15
5.8.1.2.5
Increasing only Pmax Introduces Unjustified Side Effect
p. 16
5.8.1.2.6
Power Control Simulation Parameters
p. 16
5.8.1.3
Cell Layout
p. 18
5.8.1.4
Other Simulation Assumptions
p. 19
5.8.1.5
Simulation Procedure
p. 20
5.8.2
Simulation Results
p. 20
5.9
The impact of B41 HPUE on BS blocking requirements
p. 21
5.9.1
BS in-band blocking
p. 21
5.9.1.1
Samsung Simulation Results
p. 23
5.9.1.2
Nokia Simulation Results
p. 25
5.9.1.3
Huawei Simulation Results
p. 33
5.9.2
BS out-of-band blocking
p. 36
5.10
Additional Coexistence Scenarios
p. 36
5.10.1
Additional simulation assumptions for ACLR co-existence study
p. 36
5.10.1.1
Scenario A1: Expanded cell size in aggressor network vs. conventional cell size in victim network
p. 36
5.10.1.1.1
General
p. 36
5.10.1.1.2
Macro cell propagation model
p. 36
5.10.1.1.3
Power control parameters
p. 37
5.10.1.1.4
Cell layout
p. 38
5.10.1.1.5
Other simulation assumptions
p. 40
5.10.1.1.6
Simulation procedure
p. 41
5.10.1.2
Scenario A2: Conventional cell size in aggressor/victim network with modified CLx-ile values
p. 41
5.10.1.2.1
General
p. 41
5.10.1.2.2
Macro cell propagation model
p. 41
5.10.1.2.3
Power control parameters
p. 42
5.10.1.2.4
Cell layout
p. 43
5.10.1.2.5
Other simulation assumptions
p. 43
5.10.1.2.6
Simulation Procedure
p. 44
5.10.2
Simulation results for ACLR co-existence study
p. 44
5.10.2.1
Simulation results for scenario A1
p. 44
5.10.2.1.1
China Telecom simulation results
p. 45
5.10.2.1.2
Ericsson simulation results
p. 45
5.10.2.1.3
Huawei simulation results
p. 47
5.10.2.1.4
Qualcomm simulation results
p. 49
5.10.2.2
Simulation results for scenario A2
p. 50
5.10.2.2.1
China Telecom simulation results
p. 51
5.10.2.2.2
Nokia simulation results
p. 52
5.10.2.2.3
Ericsson simulation results
p. 56
5.10.2.2.4
Huawei simulation results
p. 57
5.10.2.2.5
Qualcomm simulation results
p. 59
5.10.2.2.6
Samsung simulation results
p. 60
6
B41 HPUE transmitter characteristics
p. 61
6.1
General
p. 61
6.2
Transmit power
p. 61
6.2.1
Void
6.2.2
UE maximum output power
p. 61
6.2.2A
UE maximum output power for CA
p. 61
6.2.2B
UE maximum output power for UL-MIMO
p. 61
6.2.3
UE maximum output power for modulation / channel bandwidth
p. 62
6.2.3A
UE maximum output power for modulation / channel bandwidth for CA
p. 62
6.2.3B
UE maximum output power for modulation / channel bandwidth for UL-MIMO
p. 62
6.2.3D
UE maximum output power for modulation / channel bandwidth for ProSe
p. 62
6.2.4
UE maximum output power with additional requirements
p. 63
6.2.4A
UE maximum output power with additional requirements for CA
p. 71
6.2.4B
UE maximum output power with additional requirements for UL-MIMO
p. 71
6.2.4D
UE maximum output power with additional requirements for ProSe
p. 71
6.2.5
Configured transmitted power
p. 72
6.2.5A
Configured transmitted power for CA
p. 72
6.2.5B
Configured transmitted power for UL-MIMO
p. 72
6.2.5C
Configured transmitted power for Dual Connectivity
p. 72
6.2.5D
Configured transmitted power for ProSe
p. 72
6.3
Output power dynamics
p. 73
6.3.1
Void
6.3.2
Minimum output power
p. 73
6.3.3
Transmit OFF power
p. 73
6.3.4
ON/OFF time mask
p. 73
6.3.5
Power control
p. 73
6.4
Void
6.5
Transmit signal quality
p. 73
6.5.1
Frequency error
p. 73
6.5.2
Transmit modulation quality
p. 73
6.6
Output RF spectrum emissions
p. 73
6.6.1
Occupied bandwidth
p. 73
6.6.2
Out of band emission
p. 73
6.6.2.1
Spectrum emission mask
p. 73
6.6.2.2
Additional spectrum emission mask
p. 73
6.6.2.2.1
-
p. 73
6.6.2.2.2
Minimum requirement (network signalled value "NS_04")
p. 73
6.6.2.3
Adjacent Channel Leakage Ratio
p. 74
6.6.2.3.1
Minimum requirement E-UTRA
p. 74
6.6.2.3.2
Minimum requirements UTRA
p. 74
6.6.3
Spurious emissions
p. 74
6.6.3.1
Minimum requirements
p. 74
6.6.3.2
Spurious emission band UE co-existence
p. 74
6.7
Transmit intermodulation
p. 74
7
B41 HPUE receiver characteristics
p. 74
7.1
General
p. 74
7.2
Diversity characteristics
p. 74
7.3
Reference sensitivity power level
p. 74
7.4
Maximum input level
p. 74
7.5
Adjacent Channel Selectivity (ACS)
p. 74
7.6
Blocking characteristics
p. 75
7.6.1
In-band blocking
p. 75
7.6.2
Out-of-band blocking
p. 75
7.6.3
Narrow band blocking
p. 75
7.7
Spurious response
p. 75
7.8
Intermodulation characteristics
p. 75
7.8.1
Wide band intermodulation
p. 75
7.9
Spurious emissions
p. 75
7.10
Receiver image
p. 75
8
Other specification impacts (if applicable)
p. 76
8.1
Impacts on RAN1 specifications
p. 76
8.1.1
Signalling of the maximum output power of the UE
p. 76
8.1.2
Power Headroom reporting
p. 76
9
Conclusion
p. 76
$
Change History
p. 77