To support mobility enhancement and power saving optimization, multiple solutions were documented in
TR 23.700-28, which require 5GC/EPC to move the UE into CM-IDLE state and provide power saving parameters or mobility management parameters properly, when the UE is about to leave satellite coverage. This requires that satellite coverage availability information in the affected area to be made aware of by 5GC/EPC. According to the conclusions in
TR 23.700-28 and normative work in 23.501 [4], such satellite coverage availability information could be received by 5GC/EPC from different potential sources, e.g. the OAM, the AF/external server (e.g. Coverage Map Server). While the sources like the OAM could be trusted, the sources like the AF/external server may not always be trusted.
If 5GC/EPC receives falsified or tampered satellite coverage availability information, the 5GC/EPC may be misled to put a CM-CONNECTED UE into CM-IDLE state when the UE is still in satellite coverage, leading to service interruption; or the 5GC/EPC may be misled to provide inappropriate mobility management parameters and/or power saving parameters to the UE, which fails the optimization of power consumption. Both cases are a type of DoS attack on the UE.
If an AF is not authorized to provide satellite coverage availability information in the affected area, the 5GC/EPC may also suffer from the above threat.
The 5GS/EPS shall provide a means to ensure that the AF/external server is authorized to provide satellite coverage availability information to 5GC/EPC.