As the number of mobile devices increase and become more automated (Machine Type Communication, MTC type devices) the network is at greater risk of becoming overloaded. Additional mechanisms may be deployed to prevent and or control overload and congestion. This clause describes such optional mechanisms.
The succeeding descriptions applies to Network Mode of Operation II (requesting CS only). For NMO I (requesting both CS and PS) the procedures are described in
TS 23.060.
The MSC or VLR may support the capability to reject Location Updating Requests or IMSI Attach messages from an MS if the node is experiencing congestion.
The MSC/VLR may indicate the rejection is due to congestion with a specific congestion cause value and a specific back-off timer, see
TS 24.008.
The Mobility Management back-off timer shall not impact Cell/RAT and PLMN change. Cell/RAT and RA change do not stop the Mobility Management back-off timer. The Mobility Management back-off timer shall not be a trigger for PLMN reselection. The back-off timer is stopped as defined in
TS 24.008 when a new PLMN that is not an equivalent PLMN is accessed.
While the Mobility Management back-off timer is running, the MS shall not initiate any Mobility Management procedures. However, the MS is allowed to initiate Mobility Management procedures for priority/emergency services and mobile terminated services even when the Mobility Management back-off timer is running.
If the MS receives a paging request from the MSC/VLR while the Mobility Management back-off timer is running, the MS shall stop the Mobility Management back-off timer and initiate the CM Service Request procedure.To avoid that large amounts of MSs initiate deferred requests (almost) simultaneously, the MSC/VLR should select the Mobility Management back-off timer value so that deferred requests are not synchronised.
The decision to apply congestion control is made by the MSC/VLR, the detailed criteria for which is outside the scope of this specification but may for example take into account the low access priority indication if signalled by MSs.
The MSC/VLR should use implicit detach timer values that are larger than the Mobility Management back-off timer values to avoid that the MSC/VLR implicitly detaches the MS before the MS has performed a LAU procedure, which could lead to unneccessary signalling after the back-off timer expires.
To reduce network load from periodic location updating (LAU) signalling and to increase the time until the MS detects a potential need for changing the RAT or PLMN (e.g. due to network problems) longer values of the periodic LAU timer and implicit detach timer should be supported.
A long periodic LAU timer value may be locally configured at the MSC/VLR for MS configured for low access priority (see
TS 24.368) or may be stored as part of the subscription data in the HLR. During the IMSI Attach and Location Updating procedures, the MSC/VLR should allocate the periodic LAU timer value for the MS based on VPLMN operator policy, low access priority indication from the MS, and subscription information received from the HSS. If the allocated periodic LAU timer value is longer than T3212, the MSC/VLR shall provide the MS with the periodic LAU timer in the Location Updating Accept message as specified in
TS 24.008.
If the subscriber is not roaming and the MSC/VLR receives a subscribed periodic LAU timer value from the HSS, it should allocate the subscribed value to the MS as periodic LAU timer. If the subscriber is roaming and the MSC/VLR receives a subscribed periodic LAU timer value from the HSS, the MSC/VLR may use the subscribed periodic LAU timer value as an indication to decide for allocating a locally configured periodic LAU timer value to the MS.