Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETFspace
21222324252627282931323334353637384‑5x

Content for  TR 22.886  Word version:  16.2.0

Top   Top   None   None   Next
1…   5…

 

1  Scopep. 9

The objective of this document is to identify use cases and potential service requirements to enhance 3GPP support for V2X service in the following areas:
  • Support for non-safety V2X services (also, referred to as "comfort service") (e.g. connected vehicle, mobile high data rate entertainment, mobile hot-spot/office/home, dynamic digital map update)
  • Support for safety-related V2X services (e.g. autonomous driving, car platooning, priority handling between safety-related V2X services and other services)
  • Support for V2X services in multiple 3GPP RATs (e.g. LTE, New RAT (NR)) and networks environment, including aspects such as interoperability with non-3GPP V2X technology (e.g. ITS-G5, DSRC, ITS-Connect)
In this document, V2X-related use cases and potential requirements already included in TR 22.891 are considered and new ones are introduced.
The identification of use cases and potential requirements covers both evolved LTE RAT and new 3GPP RAT (e.g. NR) and also covers V2X operation using 3GPP RATs where there are non-3GPP V2X technologies (e.g. ITS-G5, DSRC, ITS-Connect) in use.
Up

2  Referencesp. 9

The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document.
  • References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or non-specific.
  • For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
  • For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document in the same Release as the present document.
[1]
TR 21.905: "Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications".
[2]
5G-PPP-White-Paper-on-Automotive-Vertical-Sectors.
[3]
ETSI TR 103 299 (V0.0.10): "Intelligent Transport System, Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control (CACC)".
[4]
[5]
ETSI TR 102 863 (V1.1.1): "Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Local Dynamic Map (LDM); Rationale for and guidance on standardization".
[6]
Draft ETSI EN 302 895 (V1.0.0): "Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Local Dynamic Map (LDM) Concept for Local Dynamic Maps".
[7]
ISO/TS 18750:2015 Intelligent transport systems -- Cooperative systems -- Definition of a global concept for Local Dynamic Maps.
[8]
Nan Hu, Hamid Aghajan, Tianshi Gao, Jaime Camhi, Chu Hee Lee and Daniel Rosario "Smart Node: Intelligent Traffic Interpretation", World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems, New York, 2008.
[9]
TNO, "Truck Platooning; driving the future of transportation" TNO Whitepaper, 2015.
[10]
S. Shladover, "PATH at 20 - History and Major Milestones, "Inteligent Transportation Systems, vol. 8, 2007.
[11]
[12]
Bergenhem C., Shladover S., Coelingh E., Englund C., andTsugawa S., "Overview of platooning systems," in Proceedings of the 19th ITS World Congress, Oct 22-26, Vienna, Austria (2012), 2012.
[13]
V2V Communication Quality: Measurements in a Cooperative Automotive Platooning Application, Carl Bergenhem Qamcom Research and Technology AB, Erik Coelingh Volvo Car Corp..Rolf Johansson SP Technical Research Inst of Sweden, Ali Tehrani Qamcom Research & Technology, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Carl_Bergenhem/publication/262451443_V2V_Communication_Quality_Measurements_in_a_Cooperative_Automotive_Platooning_Application/links/0f317537c05258c754000000.pdf
[14]
S. W. Kim et al., "Multivehicle Cooperative Driving Using Cooperative Perception: Design and Experimental Validation," in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 663-680, April 2015.
[15]
A. Rauch, F. Klanner and K. Dietmayer, "Analysis of V2X communication parameters for the development of a fusion architecture for cooperative perception systems," Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2011 IEEE, Baden-Baden, 2011, pp. 685-690.
[16]
METIS-II_D1.1_v1.0 Refined scenarios and requirements, consolidated use cases, and qualitative techno-economic feasibility assessment.
[17]
L. Licciardi, M. P. Galante : "5G CRITICAL COMMUNICATION USE CASES", ETSI 5G: "From Myth to Reality", 2016, http://www.etsi.org/news-events/events/1025-2016-04-5g-from-myth-to-reality
[18]
Ford: From Autonomy to Snowtonomy: How Ford Fusion Hybrid Autonomous Reasearch Vehicle can Navigate in Winter, http://www.at.ford.com/SiteCollectionImages/2016_NA/March/From%20Autonomy%20to%20Snowtonomy.pdf
[19]
5G Infrastructure Public Private Partnership (5G-PPP) (2015): 5G automotive vision, 65 p., https://5g-ppp.eu/, September 2015.
[20]
[21]
[22]
NEDO's Energy ITS Project in Japan for Automated Truck Platooning, http://www.nedo.go.jp/content/100541227.pdf
[23]
[24]
M. Althoff, O. Stursberg, and M. Buss, "Safety assessment of driving behavior in multi-lane traffic for autonomous vehicles," in Proc. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 893-900, June 2009.
[25]
TS 22.185: "Service requirements for V2X services".
[26]
P. Gomes, F. Vieira and M. Ferreira, "The See-Through System: From implementation to test-drive," Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), 2012 IEEE, Seoul, 2012, pp. 40-47.
[27]
J. Choi, N. González-Prelcic, R. Daniels, C. R. Bhat, and R. W. Heath, Jr., "Millimeter Wave Vehicular Communication to Support Massive Automotive Sensing," submitted to IEEE Communications Magazine, Jan. 2016.
[28]
N. Andersen, C2C-Consortium "Towards Accident Free Driving", ETSI Summit "5G from Myth to Reality", 2016.
[29]
M. Amoozadeh, H. Deng, C.-N. Chuah, H. M. Zhang, and D. Ghosal, "Platoon management with cooperative adaptive cruise control enabled by VANET," ELSEVIER Vehicular Communications, vol. 2. no. 2, pp. 110-123, Apr. 2015.
[30]
R. Alieiev, A. Kwoczek and T. Hehn, "Automotive requirements for future mobile networks," Microwaves for Intelligent Mobility (ICMIM), 2015 IEEE MTT-S International Conference on, Heidelberg, 2015, pp. 1-4.
[31]
M. Düring, K. Franke, et al., "Adaptive cooperative manoeuvre planning algorithm for conflict resolution in diverse traffic situations," 2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), Vienna, 2014, pp. 242-249.
[32]
TR 22.885: "Study on LTE support for V2X services".
[33]
DOT HS 811 492B, Vehicle Safety Communications - Applications (VSC-A) Final Report: Appendix Volume 1, System Design and Objective Test, pp C-2-4 and C-2-5.
[34]
A. Kwoczek (Volkswagen AG), "Automotive Requirements for Future Networks", Information Technology Society (ITG), Communication Technology, May, 2016.
[35]  Void
[36]
5G-PPP Project on "5G Air Interface Below 6 GHz", Deliverable D2.1: "Air interface framework and specification of system level simulations", http://fantastic5g.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/FANTASTIC-5G_D2_1_final_modified.pdf.
[37]
ETSI TS 102 894-2 V1.2.1, "Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Users and applications requirements; Part 2: Applications and facilities layer common data dictionary".
[38]
SAE International, "AUTOMATED DRIVING LEVELS OF DRIVING AUTOMATION ARE DEFINED IN NEW SAE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD J3016"; US Homeland Security Digital Library, "Self-Driving Cars: Levels of Automation", March 2017 https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=801463.
[39]
U.S. Department of Transportation, "Federal Automated Vehicles Policy", Sept. 2016. https://one.nhtsa.gov/nhtsa/av/av-policy.html
Up

3  Definitions and abbreviationsp. 11

3.1  Definitionsp. 11

For the purposes of the present document, the terms and definitions given in TR 21.905 and the following apply.
A term defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same term, if any, in TR 21.905.
End-to-end latency:
time it takes to transfer a given piece of information from a source to a destination, measured at the application level, from the moment it is transmitted by the source to the moment it is received at the destination.
Road Side Unit:
A stationary infrastructure entity supporting V2X applications that can exchange messages with other entities supporting V2X applications.
Up

3.2  Abbreviationsp. 12

For the purposes of the present document, the abbreviations given in TR 21.905 and the following apply.
An abbreviation defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same abbreviation, if any, in TR 21.905.
CACC
Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control
LoA
Level of Automation
RSU
Road Side Unit
V2I
Vehicle to Infrastructure
V2V
Vehicle to Vehicle

4  Overviewp. 12

A basic set of requirements for EPS to support V2X applications have been specified in [25]. These requirements are considered sufficient for vehicles (i.e., UEs supporting V2X applications) to exchange their own status information, such as position, speed and heading, with other nearby vehicles, infrastructure nodes and/or pedestrians. Also, these requirements fulfil the need to disseminate imminent warning messages to nearby entities in time. The capability of EPS to support these requirements will expedite the adoption of 3GPP connectivity by vehicles.
Despite the basic set of requirements for 3GPP system to support V2X service, it is considered growingly important among telecommunication industry and automotive industry that its evolution is necessary. Because automotive industries have begun to see V2X applications beyond unidirectional distribution of status information of vehicles, the 3GPP system needs to increase its capability enough to meet KPIs that emerging V2X applications require. That is, as V2X applications advance, transmission of short messages about vehicles' own status data will be complemented with transmission of larger messages containing raw sensor data, vehicles' intention data, coordination and confirmation of future manoeuvre and so on. For these advanced applications, the expected requirements to meet the needed data rate, reliability, latency, communication range and speed are made more stringent.
A relevant aspect of advanced V2X applications is the Level of Automation (LoA), which reflects the functional aspects of the technology and affects the system performance requirements. In accordance with the levels from SAE [X1] and NHTSA [X2], the LoA are: 0 - No Automation, 1 - Driver Assistance, 2 - Partial Automation, 3 - Conditional Automation, 4 - High Automation, 5 - Full Automation. A distinction is drawn between Levels 0-2 (Driver Control) and 3-5 (Vehicle Control) based on whether the human operator or the automated system is primarily responsible for monitoring the driving environment.
Up

Up   Top   ToC