Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETFspace
21222324252627282931323334353637384‑5x

Content for  TS 38.300  Word version:  18.1.0

Top   Top   Up   Prev   None
1…   4…   4.7…   5…   5.3…   5.4…   6…   6.2…   6.6…   7…   8…   9…   9.2.2…   9.2.2.5…   9.2.3…   9.2.3.2…   9.2.3.3…   9.2.4…   9.2.6…   9.3…   10…   11…   15…   15.5…   16…   16.2…   16.3…   16.4…   16.8…   16.9…   16.10…   16.12…   16.12.5…   16.12.6…   16.12.6.3   16.12.7   16.13…   16.14…   16.15…   16.18…   16.19…   16.21…   16.21.3…   17…   18…   19   20…   21…   A…   B…   C…   G…

 

G  Components of Mobility Latency |R18|p. 256

Mobility interruption time for L1/L2 Triggered Mobility (LTM) is the time from UE receives the cell switch command to UE performs the first DL/UL reception/transmission on the indicated beam of the target cell.
The latency of the mobility procedure for LTM is characterized by the terms illustrated in Figure G-1.
Reproduction of 3GPP TS 38.300, Fig. G-1: Components of Mobility Latency
Up
Each component of mobility latency is described in the table below, the values of which are specified in clause 6.3 of TS 38.133. The value of TRRC is specified in clause 12 of TS 38.331.
Component Meaning
TRRCProcessing time for RRCReconfiguration carrying candidate configurations
TcmdTime for processing L1/L2-command (HARQ and parsing)
TLTM-RRC-processingEarly ASN.1 decoding and validity/compliance check
TLTM-ProcessingUE processing including applying target cell parameters and L1/L2 changes
Tfirst-RSTime for fine tracking and acquiring full timing information
TRS-procTime for SSB processing
TLTM IUInterruption uncertainty in acquiring the first UL transmission
TRARTime for RAR delay
Tfirst-dataTime for UE performs the first DL/UL reception/ transmission on the indicated beam of the target cell, after RAR
The latency of the RACH-based and RACH-less LTM procedure is characterized by the terms illustrated in Figure G-2 and Figure G-3. In particular, Figure G-2 shows the LTM procedure where UE activates a TCI state of an LTM candidate cell before performing an LTM cell switch which involves a random access procedure. Further, Figure G-3 shows the LTM procedure when the UE performs the UL and DL synchronization before performing an LTM cell switch which does not involve any random access. In both figures, it is highlighted how the overall mobility latency of LTM can be reduced by early synchronization procedure. Further details on the UE processing timer of the delay components are specified in clause 6.3 of TS 38.133.
Reproduction of 3GPP TS 38.300, Fig. G-2: Mobility Latency for RACH-based LTM
Up
Reproduction of 3GPP TS 38.300, Fig. G-3: Mobility Latency for RACH-less LTM
Up

$  Change historyp. 258


Up   Top