Tech-
invite
3GPP
space
IETF
space
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
4‑5x
Content for
TR 36.889
Word version: 13.0.0
0…
2…
2
References
3
Definitions, symbols and abbreviations
4
Regulatory requirements
5
Spectrum considerations and LAA carrier aggregation feasibility study
6
Deployment scenarios for LAA
7
Design targets, functionalities and solutions for LAA
8
Coexistence evaluations
9
Conclusions
A
Evaluation methodology
B
Evaluation results for co-channel coexistence
$
Change History
2
References
3
Definitions, symbols and abbreviations
Word‑p. 8
3.1
Definitions
3.2
Symbols
3.3
Abbreviations
Word‑p. 9
4
Regulatory requirements
4.1
ITU Region 1
Word‑p. 10
4.1.1
Europe
4.1.2
Israel
Word‑p. 15
4.1.3
Russia
4.1.4
South Africa
4.1.5
Turkey
4.2
ITU Region 2
4.2.1
USA
4.2.2
Canada
Word‑p. 18
4.2.3
Brazil
Word‑p. 19
4.2.4
Mexico
4.3
ITU Region 3
4.3.1
China
4.3.2
Japan
Word‑p. 21
4.3.3
Korea
Word‑p. 28
4.3.4
India
Word‑p. 29
4.3.5
Taiwan
Word‑p. 30
4.3.6
Singapore
Word‑p. 32
4.3.7
Australia
4.4
Applicability of DFS requirements
4.4.1
DFS according to ECC
Word‑p. 33
4.4.2
DFS in the Part 15 rules
5
Spectrum considerations and LAA carrier aggregation feasibility study
Word‑p. 34
5.1
Licensed spectrum needs for LAA
5.2
LAA carrier aggregation feasibility study
Word‑p. 35
5.2.1
Feasibility of UE operation
5.2.2
Feasibility of BS operation
5.3
Band definition for unlicensed operation of LTE in 5GHz spectrum
5.3.1
Band range
5.3.2
Suitable duplex method for unlicensed bands
5.3.3
UE RF devices for 5GHz band
Word‑p. 36
6
Deployment scenarios for LAA
7
Design targets, functionalities and solutions for LAA
Word‑p. 37
7.1
Design targets and functionalities
7.2
Solutions for operation in unlicensed spectrum
Word‑p. 38
7.2.1
Physical layer aspects
7.2.2
Higher layer aspects
Word‑p. 45
8
Coexistence evaluations
Word‑p. 51
8.1
Scenarios and methodology
8.2
Channel access schemes
Word‑p. 52
8.3
Coexistence results
Word‑p. 53
8.3.1
Coexistence evaluation results for LAA with only DL transmissions
8.3.2
Coexistence evaluation results for LAA with DL and UL transmissions
Word‑p. 62
8.3.3
Adjacent channel interference analysis for Wi-Fi-LAA scenario
Word‑p. 64
8.3.4
Adjacent channel interference analysis for LAA-LAA to scenario
Word‑p. 68
9
Conclusions
Word‑p. 73
A
Evaluation methodology
Word‑p. 75
A.1
General evaluation assumptions
A.1.1
Indoor scenario for LAA coexistence evaluations
A.1.2
Outdoor scenario for LAA coexistence evaluations
Word‑p. 79
A.2
Additional evaluation assumptions
Word‑p. 83
A.2.1
Additional Wi-Fi system evaluation assumptions
A.2.2
Additional LAA system evaluation assumptions
Word‑p. 84
A.2.3
Details of average buffer occupancy (BO) reporting
B
Evaluation results for co-channel coexistence
Word‑p. 86
B.1
Coexistence evaluation results for DL-only LAA and DL-only Wi-Fi
B.2
Coexistence evaluation results for DL-only LAA and DL+UL Wi-Fi
B.3
Coexistence evaluation results for DL+UL LAA and DL+UL Wi-Fi
$
Change History
Word‑p. 87