RFC 8343

Proposed STD
Pages: 49

Group: NETMOD

A YANG Data Model for Interface Management

Part 1 of 3, p. 1 to 10

Obsoletes: 7223

Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) M. Bjorklund Request for Comments: 8343 Tail-f Systems Obsoletes: 7223 March 2018 Category: Standards Track ISSN: 2070-1721 A YANG Data Model for Interface Management Abstract This document defines a YANG data model for the management of network interfaces. It is expected that interface-type-specific data models augment the generic interfaces data model defined in this document. The data model includes definitions for configuration and system state (status information and counters for the collection of statistics). The YANG data model in this document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) defined in RFC 8342. This document obsoletes RFC 7223. Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8343.

Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2018 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................3 1.1. Summary of Changes from RFC 7223 ...........................3 1.2. Terminology ................................................3 1.3. Tree Diagrams ..............................................4 2. Objectives ......................................................5 3. Interfaces Data Model ...........................................5 3.1. The Interface List .........................................6 3.2. Interface References .......................................8 3.3. Interface Layering .........................................8 4. Relationship to the IF-MIB ......................................9 5. Interfaces YANG Module .........................................10 6. IANA Considerations ............................................34 7. Security Considerations ........................................35 8. References .....................................................36 8.1. Normative References ......................................36 8.2. Informative References ....................................37 Appendix A. Example: Ethernet Interface Module ...................38 Appendix B. Example: Ethernet Bonding Interface Module ...........39 Appendix C. Example: VLAN Interface Module .......................40 Appendix D. Example: NETCONF <get-config> Reply ..................41 Appendix E. Example: NETCONF <get-data> Reply ....................42 Appendix F. Examples: Interface Naming Schemes ...................44 F.1. Router with Restricted Interface Names ....................44 F.2. Router with Arbitrary Interface Names .....................45 F.3. Ethernet Switch with Restricted Interface Names ...........46 F.4. Generic Host with Restricted Interface Names ..............47 F.5. Generic Host with Arbitrary Interface Names ...............48 Acknowledgments ...................................................49 Author's Address ..................................................49

1. Introduction This document defines a YANG data model [RFC7950] for the management of network interfaces. It is expected that interface-type-specific data models will augment the generic interfaces data model defined in this document. Network interfaces are central to the management of many Internet protocols. Thus, it is important to establish a common data model for how interfaces are identified, configured, and monitored. The data model includes configuration data and state data (status information and counters for the collection of statistics). This version of the interfaces data model supports the Network Management Datastore Architecture (NMDA) [RFC8342]. 1.1. Summary of Changes from RFC 7223 The "/interfaces-state" subtree with "config false" data nodes is deprecated. All "config false" data nodes are now present in the "/interfaces" subtree. Servers that do not implement NMDA, or that wish to support clients that do not implement NMDA, MAY implement the deprecated "/interfaces-state" tree. 1.2. Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here. The following terms are used within this document: o system-controlled interface: An interface is said to be system- controlled if the system creates and deletes the interface independently of what has been explicitly configured. Examples are interfaces representing physical hardware that appear and disappear when hardware (e.g., a line card or hot-pluggable wireless interface) is added or removed. System-controlled interfaces may also appear if a certain functionality is enabled (e.g., a loopback interface might appear if the IP protocol stack is enabled).

o user-controlled interface: An interface is said to be user- controlled if the creation of the interface is controlled by adding explicit interface configuration to the intended configuration and the removal of the interface is controlled by removing explicit interface configuration from the intended configuration. Examples are VLAN interfaces configured on a system-controlled Ethernet interface. The following terms are defined in [RFC8342] and are not redefined here: o client o server o configuration o system state o operational state o intended configuration o running configuration datastore o operational state datastore The following terms are defined in [RFC7950] and are not redefined here: o augment o data model o data node 1.3. Tree Diagrams Tree diagrams used in this document follow the notation defined in [RFC8340].

2. Objectives This section describes some of the design objectives for the model presented in Section 5. o It is recognized that existing implementations will have to map the interface data model defined in this memo to their proprietary native data model. To facilitate such mappings, the data model should be simple. o The data model should be suitable for new implementations to use as is, without requiring a mapping to a different native model. o References to interfaces should be as simple as possible, preferably by using a single leafref. o The mapping to ifIndex [RFC2863] used by the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) to identify interfaces must be clear. o The model must support interface layering: both (1) simple layering, where one interface is layered on top of exactly one other interface, and (2) more complex scenarios, where one interface results from the aggregation of N other interfaces or when N interfaces are multiplexed over one other interface. o The data model should support the pre-provisioning of interface configuration; that is, it should be possible to configure an interface whose physical interface hardware is not present on the device. It is recommended that devices that support dynamic addition and removal of physical interfaces also support pre-provisioning. o The data model should support physical interfaces as well as logical interfaces. o The data model should include read-only counters in order to gather statistics for sent and received octets and packets, received packets with errors, and packets that could not be sent due to errors. 3. Interfaces Data Model This document defines the YANG module "ietf-interfaces", which has the following structure, excluding the deprecated "/interfaces-state" subtree:

module: ietf-interfaces +--rw interfaces +--rw interface* [name] +--rw name string +--rw description? string +--rw type identityref +--rw enabled? boolean +--rw link-up-down-trap-enable? enumeration {if-mib}? +--ro admin-status enumeration {if-mib}? +--ro oper-status enumeration +--ro last-change? yang:date-and-time +--ro if-index int32 {if-mib}? +--ro phys-address? yang:phys-address +--ro higher-layer-if* interface-ref +--ro lower-layer-if* interface-ref +--ro speed? yang:gauge64 +--ro statistics +--ro discontinuity-time yang:date-and-time +--ro in-octets? yang:counter64 +--ro in-unicast-pkts? yang:counter64 +--ro in-broadcast-pkts? yang:counter64 +--ro in-multicast-pkts? yang:counter64 +--ro in-discards? yang:counter32 +--ro in-errors? yang:counter32 +--ro in-unknown-protos? yang:counter32 +--ro out-octets? yang:counter64 +--ro out-unicast-pkts? yang:counter64 +--ro out-broadcast-pkts? yang:counter64 +--ro out-multicast-pkts? yang:counter64 +--ro out-discards? yang:counter32 +--ro out-errors? yang:counter32 3.1. The Interface List The data model for interfaces presented in this document uses a flat list of interfaces ("/interfaces/interface"). Each interface in the list is identified by its name. Furthermore, each interface has a mandatory "type" leaf. The "iana-if-type" module [RFC7224] defines YANG identities for the interface types in the IANA-maintained "ifType definitions" registry. It is expected that interface-type-specific data models augment the interface list and possibly use the "type" leaf to make the augmentation conditional.

As an example of such an interface-type-specific augmentation, consider this YANG snippet. For a more complete example, see Appendix A. import interfaces { prefix "if"; } import iana-if-type { prefix ianaift; } augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" { when "if:type = 'ianaift:ethernetCsmacd'"; container ethernet { leaf duplex { ... } } } For system-controlled interfaces, the "name" is the device-specific name of the interface. If the device supports arbitrarily named user-controlled interfaces, then the server will advertise the "arbitrary-names" feature. If the server does not advertise this feature, the names of user-controlled interfaces MUST match the device's naming scheme. How a client can learn the naming scheme of such devices is outside the scope of this document. See Appendices F.1 and F.2 for examples. When a system-controlled interface is created in the operational state by the system, the system tries to apply the interface configuration in the intended configuration with the same name as the new interface. If no such interface configuration is found, or if the configured type does not match the real interface type, the system creates the interface without applying explicit configuration. When a user-controlled interface is created, the configuration determines the name of the interface. Depending on the operating system and the physical attachment point to which a network interface may be attached or removed, it may be impossible for an implementation to provide predictable and consistent names for system-controlled interfaces across insertion/ removal cycles as well as in anticipation of initial insertion. The ability to provide configurations for such interfaces is therefore dependent on the implementation and cannot be assumed in all cases.

3.2. Interface References An interface is identified by its name, which is unique within the server. This property is captured in the "interface-ref" typedef, which other YANG modules SHOULD use when they need to reference an interface. 3.3. Interface Layering There is no generic mechanism for how an interface is configured to be layered on top of some other interface. It is expected that interface-type-specific models define their own data nodes for interface layering by using "interface-ref" types to reference lower layers. Below is an example of a model with such nodes. For a more complete example, see Appendix B. import interfaces { prefix "if"; } import iana-if-type { prefix ianaift; } augment "/if:interfaces/if:interface" { when "if:type = 'ianaift:ieee8023adLag'"; leaf-list slave-if { type if:interface-ref; must "/if:interfaces/if:interface[if:name = current()]" + "/if:type = 'ianaift:ethernetCsmacd'" { description "The type of a slave interface must be 'ethernetCsmacd'."; } } // other bonding config params, failover times, etc. } While the interface layering is configured in interface-type-specific models, two generic state data leaf-lists, "higher-layer-if" and "lower-layer-if", represent a read-only view of the interface layering hierarchy.

4. Relationship to the IF-MIB If the device implements the IF-MIB [RFC2863], each entry in the "/interfaces/interface" list in the operational state is typically mapped to one ifEntry. The "if-index" leaf MUST contain the value of the corresponding ifEntry's ifIndex. In most cases, the "name" of an "/interfaces/interface" entry is mapped to ifName. The IF-MIB allows two different ifEntries to have the same ifName. Devices that support this feature and also support the data model defined in this document cannot have a 1-1 mapping between the "name" leaf and ifName. The configured "description" of an "interface" has traditionally been mapped to ifAlias in some implementations. This document allows this mapping, but implementers should be aware of the differences in the value space and persistence for these objects. See the YANG module definition of the leaf "description" in Section 5 for details. The IF-MIB also defines the writable object ifPromiscuousMode. Since this object typically is not implemented as a configuration object by SNMP agents, it is not mapped to the "ietf-interfaces" module. The ifMtu object from the IF-MIB is not mapped to the "ietf-interfaces" module. It is expected that interface-type- specific YANG modules provide interface-type-specific MTU leafs by augmenting the "ietf-interfaces" model. There are a number of counters in the IF-MIB that exist in two versions: one with 32 bits and one with 64 bits. The 64-bit versions were added to support high-speed interfaces with a data rate greater than 20,000,000 bits/second. Today's implementations generally support such high-speed interfaces; hence, only 64-bit counters are provided in this data model. Note that the server that implements this module and an SNMP agent may differ in the time granularity in which they provide access to the counters. For example, it is common that SNMP implementations cache counter values for some time. The objects ifDescr and ifConnectorPresent from the IF-MIB are not mapped to the "ietf-interfaces" module. The following table lists the YANG data nodes with corresponding objects in the IF-MIB.

(page 10 continued on part 2)