Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETFspace
959493929190898887868584838281807978777675747372717069686766656463626160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039383736353433323130292827262524232221201918171615141312111009080706050403020100
in Index   Prev   Next

RFC 6626

Dynamic Prefix Allocation for Network Mobility for Mobile IPv4 (NEMOv4)

Pages: 5
Proposed Standard
Updates:  5177

Top   ToC   RFC6626 - Page 1
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)                       G. Tsirtsis
Request for Comments: 6626                                       V. Park
Updates: 5177                                               V. Narayanan
Category: Standards Track                                       Qualcomm
ISSN: 2070-1721                                                 K. Leung
                                                                   Cisco
                                                                May 2012


                     Dynamic Prefix Allocation for
               Network Mobility for Mobile IPv4 (NEMOv4)

Abstract

The base Network Mobility for Mobile IPv4 (NEMOv4) specification defines extensions to Mobile IPv4 for mobile networks. This specification defines a dynamic prefix allocation mechanism for NEMOv4. Status of This Memo This is an Internet Standards Track document. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6626. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2012 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License.
Top   ToC   RFC6626 - Page 2

Table of Contents

1. Introduction ....................................................2 2. Requirements Notation ...........................................2 3. Dynamic Mobile Prefix Allocation ................................2 3.1. Mobile Client Considerations ...............................2 3.2. Home Agent Considerations ..................................3 4. Security Considerations .........................................4 5. IANA Considerations .............................................4 6. Acknowledgements ................................................4 7. Normative References ............................................4

1. Introduction

The base NEMOv4 specification [RFC5177] defines extensions to Mobile IPv4 [RFC5944] for mobile networks. This specification adds support for dynamic allocation of mobile prefixes by the home agent.

2. Requirements Notation

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].

3. Dynamic Mobile Prefix Allocation

The following extension is defined according to this specification.

3.1. Mobile Client Considerations

According to this specification, the Prefix field of the Mobile Network Request extension MUST be set to zero to indicate that the Mobile Router requests mobile network prefix(es) be assigned to it by the home agent. In this case, the Mobile Router MAY set the prefix length field of such extensions to zero or to a length of its choice as a hint to the home agent. According to this specification, Mobile Network Request extensions with the Prefix field set to zero MAY be included in a registration request message either during initial registration or during a subsequent registration. When a Mobile Router receives a registration reply, it MUST process it as defined in Mobile IPv4 [RFC5944] and [RFC5177]. If one or more network acknowledgement extensions are included with the Code field set to "Success", the Mobile Router SHOULD treat the prefixes in the corresponding Prefix fields as allocated prefixes and create the appropriate bindings as defined in [RFC5177].
Top   ToC   RFC6626 - Page 3
   In response to a registration request with a Mobile Network Request
   extension with the Prefix field set to zero, if a Mobile Router
   receives a registration reply with a network acknowledgement
   extension including Code field set to 1 "invalid prefix", it may use
   it as a hint that the home agent does not support dynamic prefix
   allocation.

3.2. Home Agent Considerations

A home agent receiving a Mobile Network Request extension with the Prefix field set to zero MAY return a Mobile Network Acknowledgement extension [RFC5177] with the Prefix field set to the prefix allocated to the Mobile Router. The length of that prefix is at the discretion of the home agent. The home agent MAY take into account the prefix length hint if one is included in the Mobile Network Request extension. Once the home agent allocates a prefix, it MUST maintain the prefix registration table as defined in [RFC5177]. Alternatively, the home agent MAY return a Mobile Network Acknowledgement extension with the Code field set to one of the negative codes defined in [RFC5177]. Dynamic mobile prefix allocation, as defined in this specification, MAY be combined with dynamic home address allocation, as defined in [RFC5177]. In other words, the home address field of the registration request message MAY be set to zero while the message also includes one or more Mobile Network Request extensions with the Prefix field also set to zero. Once the home agent allocates a prefix, it MUST maintain the prefix registration table as defined in [RFC5177]. The lifetime of the allocated prefix will be equal to the lifetime of the binding cache entry. The Mobile Router may request for multiple mobile network prefixes to be assigned by the home agent. For a Mobile Network Prefix for which the assignment was unsuccessful, the Code field in the corresponding Mobile Network Acknowledgement extension should be set to 4 (MOBNET_UNASSIGNED). For dynamic prefix allocation, the Mobile Router's home address MAY be used to identify the client if it is not set to zero. Otherwise, as defined in the Network Access Identifier (NAI) extension [RFC2794] of Mobile IPv4 [RFC2794], the NAI extension needs to be included in the registration request, in which case the same extension SHOULD be used to identify the Mobile Router for prefix allocation purposes.
Top   ToC   RFC6626 - Page 4

4. Security Considerations

This specification operates in the security constraints and requirements of Mobile IPv4 [RFC5944], NAI [RFC2794], and [RFC5177]. Home agent implementations SHOULD take steps to prevent address exhaustion attacks. One way to limit the effectiveness of such an attack is to limit the number and size of prefixes any one Mobile Router can be allocated.

5. IANA Considerations

A new value has been assigned in the Mobile Network Acknowledgement Extension registry: 4 - Home Agent cannot assign a mobile network prefix (MOBNET_UNASSIGNED).

6. Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Pete McCann, Alexandru Petrescu, Ralph Droms, and Jari Arkko for their reviews and comments.

7. Normative References

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC2794] Calhoun, P. and C. Perkins, "Mobile IP Network Access Identifier Extension for IPv4", RFC 2794, March 2000. [RFC5177] Leung, K., Dommety, G., Narayanan, V., and A. Petrescu, "Network Mobility (NEMO) Extensions for Mobile IPv4", RFC 5177, April 2008. [RFC5944] Perkins, C., "IP Mobility Support for IPv4, Revised", RFC 5944, November 2010.
Top   ToC   RFC6626 - Page 5

Authors' Addresses

George Tsirtsis Qualcomm EMail: tsirtsis@googlemail.com Vincent Park Qualcomm Phone: +908-443-8141 EMail: vpark@qualcomm.com Vidya Narayana Qualcomm Phone: +858-845-2483 EMail: vidyan@qualcomm.com Kent Leung Cisco Phone: +408-526-5030 EMail: kleung@cisco.com