Tech-invite3GPPspaceIETFspace
21222324252627282931323334353637384‑5x

Content for  TR 22.891  Word version:  14.2.0

Top   Top   None   None   Next
1…   4…   5.25…   5.50…   6…

 

1  Scopep. 10

The present document aims to identify the market segments and verticals whose needs 3GPP should focus on meeting, and to identify groups of related use cases and requirements that the 3GPP eco-system would need to support in the future. This is a very broad and wide-ranging endeavour. As a result, the work will be organised so that a subset of distinct work/study items with clearly focussed objectives are executed in each stage of the work.
This study will develop several use cases covering various scenarios and identify the related high-level potential requirements which can be derived from them. It will identify and group together use cases with common characteristics and propose a few, e.g. 3-4, use cases (or groups of use cases with common characteristics) for further development in the next stage of the work.
Analysis will also be made on which legacy services and requirements from the existing 3GPP systems need to be included, if fallback mechanisms to them need to be developed, or if fallback is not necessary.
The focus of this work is on the use cases and requirements that cannot be met with EPS. Use cases identified as applicable for EPS are outside the scope of this study and are expected to be progressed independently of it.
Up

2  Referencesp. 10

The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present document.
[1]
TR 21.905: "Vocabulary for 3GPP Specifications".
[2]
NGMN 5G White Paper v1.0
[3]
China IMT2020 (5G) Promotion Group white paper "5G Vision and Requirements" May 2014.
[4]
TR 36.913: v12.0.0. "Requirements for further advancements for Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA), Release 12"
[5]
China IMT2020 (5G) Promotion Group white paper "5G Concept" February 2015.
[6]
4G Americas' Recommendations on 5G Requirements and Solutions, October 2014.
[7]
FP7 COMBO, "Requirement for converged fixed and mobile networks", deliverable, D2.4, June, 2014, available at http://ict-combo.eu/data/uploads/pdf-combo-v2/combo_d2.4_wp4_20june2014_tid_v2.0_sec.pdf
[8]
TS 22.105: "Services and service capabilities".
[9]
[10]
GSMA, "Understanding 5G: perspectives on future technological advancements in mobile", Dec., 2014.
[11]
Requirements and Current Solutions of Wireless Communication in Industrial Automation, A. Frotzscher et al., IEEE ICC'14 - W8: Workshop on 5G Technologies, 2014
[12]
Design of a Low-Latency, High-Reliability Wireless Communication System for Control Applications, M. Weiner et al., IEEE ICC 2014 - Selected Ares in Communications Symposium, 2014.
[13]
Funding project BMBF by German government on wireless Factory Automation (2014), http://www.bmbf.de/foerderungen/22967.php
[14]
Unplugged but Connected: Design and Implementation of a Truly Wireless Real-Time Sensor/Actuator Interface, G. Scheible et al, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, 2007[15] Wireless Sensors in Industrial Time-Critical Environments, Jose Cecilio & Pedro Furtado, Springer, ISBN 978-3-31-02888-8
[16]
WirelessHART versus ISA100.11a: The Format War Hits the Factory Floor, S. Peterson & S. Carlsen, IEEE Industrial Electronics Magazine, Dec 2011.
[17]
Wireless Industrial Monitoring and Control Networks: The Journey So Far and the Road Ahead, P. Zand et al, J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2012.
[18]
Performance Evaluation of WirelessHART for Factory Automation, S. Petersen & S. Carlson, IEEE Emerging Technologies & Factory Automation, 2009.
[19]
Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks, ON World, www.onworld.com, 2010
[20]
Coexistence of Wireless Systems in Automation Technology, ZVEI - German Electrical and Electronic Manufacturers' Association, 2009.
[21]
China IMT2020 (5G) Promotion Group. "5G Network Technology Architecture" May 2015
[22]
European Commission's 5G PPP "5G Vision", Feb. 2015. www.5g-ppp.eu.
[23]
About Portable SIM. https://goo.gl/fLEqb4
[24]
M.C. Batistatos, G.V. Tsoulos, G.E. Athanasiadou, "Mobile Telemedicine for Moving Vehicle Scenarios Wireless Technology Options and Challenges"!, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 35, pp.1140-1150, May 2012.
[25]
Summary of Deliverable 1.5: Updated scenarios, requirements and KPIs for 5G mobile and wireless system with recommendations for future investigations, May 2015, https://www.metis2020.com/wp-content/uploads/deliverables/METIS_D1.5_Summary.pdf
[26]
Report ITU-R M.2282-0, "Systems for public mobile communications with aircraft M Series Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services". (https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/opb/rep/R-REP-M.2282-2013-MSW-E.docx)
[27]
Cisco Visual Networking Index: Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update 2014-2019 White Paper, Table 6 (http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/white_paper_c11-520862.html)
[28]
ARIB 2020 and Beyond Ad Hoc Group White Paper, October 2014. http://www.arib.or.jp/english/20bah-wp-100.pdf
[29]
RP-142307, "New SI proposal: Study on performance enhancements for high speed scenario in LTE," NTT DOCOMO, INC., Huawei, HiSilicon, Dec. 2014.
[30]
TR 22.861: "Feasibility Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers for Massive Internet of Things; Stage 1".
[31]
TR 22.862: "Feasibility Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers - Critical Communications; Stage 1"
[32]
TR 22.863: "Feasibility Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers - Enhanced Mobile Broadband; Stage 1"
[33]
TR 22.864: "Feasibility Study on New Services and Markets Technology Enablers - Network Operation; Stage 1"
[34]
GSA 5G Verticals Series - Education. http://gsacom.com/paper/5g-verticals-education/ https://community.jisc.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Education-VM_Extended.pdf
Up

3  Definitions, symbols and abbreviationsp. 12

3.1  Definitionsp. 12

For the purposes of the present document, the terms and definitions given in TR 21.905 and the following apply. A term defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same term, if any, in TR 21.905.
Communication efficiency:
refers to spectrum efficiency (bits/s/Hz) and/or energy efficiency (bits/J, or vs. LTE) and/or network resource efficiency ([TBD])
Connection density (UEs/km2):
number of UEs connected to the <5G network> over a given area.
End-to-end latency (ms):
time it takes to transfer a given piece of information from a source to a destination, measured at the application level, from the moment it is transmitted by the source to the moment it is received at the destination.
Mobility (km/h):
Absolute speed of a UE.
Peak data rate (bps):
ideal data rate at the radio layer i.e. under ideal radio conditions. Direction (downlink, uplink) to be defined.
Processing time (ms):
time it takes to process a given piece of data in a given node, for further action. The node needs to be defined.
Radio Interface Technology (RIT):
Type of technology used for radio communication between two or more devices, without limitation to the functional capability or the purpose of the communication. A RIT may be used to provide a traditional access function, a backhaul function, a direct device-to-device (D2D) function between peers, or multiple such functions. A RIT may also support a variety of different communication modes (e.g., unicast, multicast, broadcast) and/or topologies (e.g., point-to-point, star, tree, or mesh).
Reliability (%):
the amount of sent network layer packets successfully delivered to a given node within the time constraint required by the targeted service, divided by the total number of sent network layer packets.
Round-trip-time (ms):
time it takes to transfer a given piece of data between two nodes, to process the piece of data at the receiving node, and to transfer an acknowledgement status back to the transmitting node, measured from the moment the piece of data is transmitted to the moment the acknowledgement status is received. This does not assume correct reception of either the piece of data or the acknowledgement status. (I.e. it is the sum of transmission delay from the transmitting node to the receiving node, processing time at the receiving node, and transmission delay from the receiving node to the transmitting node). Nodes need to be defined.
Transmission delay (ms):
time it takes to transfer a given piece of data between two nodes, measured from the moment it is transmitted to the moment it is received. This does not assume correct reception. Nodes need to be defined.
Traffic density (bps/km2):
total traffic over a given area. Direction (downlink, uplink) to be defined when applicable.
User experienced data rate (bps):
data rate averaged over a given duration (to be defined), in a given direction (uplink or downlink), measured at the transport layer or above. Direction (downlink, uplink) to be defined.
Up

3.2  Abbreviationsp. 12

For the purposes of the present document, the abbreviations given in TR 21.905 and the following apply.
An abbreviation defined in the present document takes precedence over the definition of the same abbreviation, if any, in TR 21.905.

Up   Top   ToC